Fernandez-Diaz Oscar F, Navia Alfonso, Berner Juan Enrique, Ahmad Fateh, Guerra Claudio, Ragbir Maniram
St. Andrew's Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Broomfield Hospital. Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Sep 23;49(5):668-675. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756349. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Educational resources on the internet are extensively used to obtain medical information. YouTube is the most accessed video platform containing information to enhance the learning experience of medical professionals. This study systematically analyzed the educational value of microsurgery-related videos on this platform. A systematic review was conducted on YouTube from April 18 to May 18, 2020, using the following terms: "microsurgery," "microsurgical," "microsurgical anastomosis," "free flap," and "free tissue transfer." The search was limited to the first 100 videos, and two independent reviewers screened for eligible entries and analyzed their educational value using validated scales, including a modified version of the DISCERN score (M-DISCERN), (JAMAS) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Evaluation of video popularity was also assessed with the video power index (VPI). Of 356 retrieved videos, 75 (21%) were considered eligible. The educational quality of videos was highly variable, and the mean global scores for the M-DISCERN, JAMAS, and GQS for our sample were consistent with medium to low quality. A limited number of videos on YouTube for microsurgical education have high-educational quality. The majority scored low on the utilized criteria. Peer-reviewed resources seem to be a more reliable resource. Although the potential of YouTube should not be disregarded, videos should be carefully appraised before being used as an educational resource.
互联网上的教育资源被广泛用于获取医学信息。YouTube是访问量最大的视频平台,包含有助于提升医学专业人员学习体验的信息。本研究系统分析了该平台上与显微外科相关视频的教育价值。
2020年4月18日至5月18日,在YouTube上进行了一项系统评价,使用了以下检索词:“显微外科”“显微手术的”“显微外科吻合术”“游离皮瓣”和“游离组织移植”。检索限于前100个视频,两名独立评审员筛选符合条件的条目,并使用经过验证的量表分析其教育价值,包括DISCERN评分修改版(M-DISCERN)、(《美国医学会杂志》)基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)。还通过视频影响力指数(VPI)评估视频的受欢迎程度。
在检索到的356个视频中,75个(21%)被认为符合条件。视频的教育质量差异很大,我们样本的M-DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》和GQS的平均全球得分与中低质量一致。
YouTube上用于显微外科教育的视频数量有限,教育质量高的视频较少。大多数视频在所使用的标准上得分较低。经过同行评审的资源似乎是更可靠的资源。尽管不应忽视YouTube的潜力,但在将视频用作教育资源之前,应仔细评估。