Spee Blanca T M, Sladky Ronald, Fingerhut Joerg, Laciny Alice, Kraus Christoph, Carls-Diamante Sidney, Brücke Christof, Pelowski Matthew, Treven Marco
Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13:930293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930293. eCollection 2022.
Recurrent, unvarying, and seemingly purposeless patterns of action and cognition are part of normal development, but also feature prominently in several neuropsychiatric conditions. Repetitive stereotyped behaviors (RSBs) can be viewed as exaggerated forms of learned habits and frequently correlate with alterations in motor, limbic, and associative basal ganglia circuits. However, it is still unclear how altered basal ganglia feedback signals actually relate to the phenomenological variability of RSBs. Why do behaviorally overlapping phenomena sometimes require different treatment approaches-for example, sensory shielding strategies versus exposure therapy for autism and obsessive-compulsive disorder, respectively? Certain clues may be found in recent models of basal ganglia function that extend well beyond action selection and motivational control, and have implications for sensorimotor integration, prediction, learning under uncertainty, as well as aesthetic learning. In this paper, we systematically compare three exemplary conditions with basal ganglia involvement, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Parkinson's disease, and autism spectrum conditions, to gain a new understanding of RSBs. We integrate clinical observations and neuroanatomical and neurophysiological alterations with accounts employing the predictive processing framework. Based on this review, we suggest that basal ganglia feedback plays a central role in preconditioning cortical networks to anticipate self-generated, movement-related perception. In this way, basal ganglia feedback appears ideally situated to adjust the salience of sensory signals through precision weighting of (external) new sensory information, relative to the precision of (internal) predictions based on prior generated models. Accordingly, behavioral policies may preferentially rely on new data versus existing knowledge, in a spectrum spanning between novelty and stability. RSBs may then represent compensatory or reactive responses, respectively, at the opposite ends of this spectrum. This view places an important role of aesthetic learning on basal ganglia feedback, may account for observed changes in creativity and aesthetic experience in basal ganglia disorders, is empirically testable, and may inform creative art therapies in conditions characterized by stereotyped behaviors.
反复出现、一成不变且看似无目的的行为和认知模式是正常发育的一部分,但在几种神经精神疾病中也很突出。重复性刻板行为(RSBs)可被视为习得习惯的夸张形式,且经常与运动、边缘和联合基底神经节回路的改变相关。然而,基底神经节反馈信号的改变实际上如何与RSBs的现象学变异性相关仍不清楚。为什么行为上重叠的现象有时需要不同的治疗方法——例如,分别针对自闭症和强迫症的感觉屏蔽策略与暴露疗法?在最近关于基底神经节功能的模型中可能会找到一些线索,这些模型远远超出了动作选择和动机控制的范畴,对感觉运动整合、预测、不确定性下的学习以及审美学习都有影响。在本文中,我们系统地比较了三种有基底神经节参与的典型病症,即强迫症、帕金森病和自闭症谱系病症,以对RSBs有新的认识。我们将临床观察以及神经解剖学和神经生理学改变与采用预测处理框架的描述相结合。基于这一综述,我们认为基底神经节反馈在预处理皮层网络以预测自我产生的、与运动相关的感知方面起着核心作用。通过这种方式,基底神经节反馈似乎处于理想位置,可通过相对于基于先前生成模型的(内部)预测精度对(外部)新感觉信息进行精确加权来调整感觉信号的显著性。因此,行为策略可能会在新颖性和稳定性之间的范围内优先依赖新数据而非现有知识。然后,RSBs可能分别代表这一范围两端的补偿性或反应性反应。这种观点突出了审美学习在基底神经节反馈中的重要作用,可能解释了在基底神经节疾病中观察到的创造力和审美体验的变化,是可通过实验验证的,并且可能为以刻板行为为特征的病症中的创意艺术疗法提供参考。