Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079, DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
National Association ReumaZorg Nederland, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Sep 26;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01858-w.
Difficulty to recognize inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in a primary care setting leads to late referral to secondary care. An evidence-based digital referral algorithm can support early referral, yet implementation in daily practice only succeeds with support of end users. We aim to understand the context of implementing a digital referral algorithm and explore the potential barriers and facilitators to implementation.
This qualitative study comprised focus groups and an online survey. Focus groups were performed with patients from outpatient rheumatology clinics. Surveys were sent out to general practitioners and rheumatologists distributed over The Netherlands. The presented digital referral algorithm originates from the JOINT referral study. Thematic analysis was used with inductive and deductive approaches.
In total 26 patients participated distributed over three focus groups, and 215 caregivers (104 rheumatologists, 111 general practitioners) filled out the survey. Both patients and caregivers endorse the need for early referral, and recognize the perceived benefit of the digital algorithm. Potential barriers include the complexity of currently included questions, and the outcome lacking information on what to do with no risk of IRD. In order for implementation to be successful, the inclusivity, accessibility, content and outcome of the algorithm are considered important themes.
Successful implementation of a digital referral algorithm needs a systematic multi-facetted approach, considering the barriers and facilitators for implementation as discussed. Since the majority of identified barriers and facilitators was overlapping between all stakeholders, findings from this study can reliably inform further decision strategies for successful implementation.
初级保健环境中识别炎症性风湿病(IRD)的难度导致向二级保健的转诊延迟。基于证据的数字转诊算法可以支持早期转诊,但只有在最终用户的支持下,该算法在日常实践中的实施才会成功。我们旨在了解实施数字转诊算法的背景,并探讨实施的潜在障碍和促进因素。
本定性研究包括焦点小组和在线调查。焦点小组在门诊风湿病诊所的患者中进行。调查分发给荷兰各地的全科医生和风湿病医生。所提出的数字转诊算法源自 JOINT 转诊研究。采用归纳和演绎方法进行主题分析。
共有 26 名患者参加了三个焦点小组,215 名护理人员(104 名风湿病医生,111 名全科医生)填写了调查。患者和护理人员都认可早期转诊的必要性,并认识到数字算法的预期好处。潜在的障碍包括目前包含的问题的复杂性,以及缺乏关于无 IRD 风险时该做什么的信息的结果。为了成功实施,算法的包容性、可及性、内容和结果被认为是重要的主题。
成功实施数字转诊算法需要系统的多方面方法,考虑到实施的障碍和促进因素,正如讨论的那样。由于大多数确定的障碍和促进因素在所有利益相关者之间都存在重叠,因此本研究的结果可以为成功实施提供可靠的决策策略信息。