Department of Sport and Exercise, School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):457-481. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004257. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Hall, AJ, Aspe, RR, Craig, TP, Kavaliauskas, M, Babraj, J, and Swinton, PA. The effects of sprint interval training on physical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 457-481, 2023-The present study aimed to synthesize findings from published research and through meta-analysis quantify the effect of sprint interval training (SIT) and potential moderators on physical performance outcomes (categorized as aerobic, anaerobic, mixed aerobic-anaerobic, or muscular force) with healthy adults, in addition to assessing the methodological quality of included studies and the existence of small study effects. Fifty-five studies were included (50% moderate methodological quality, 42% low methodological quality), with 58% comprising an intervention duration of ≤4 weeks and an array of different training protocols. Bayesian's meta-analysis of standardized mean differences (SMD) identified a medium effect of improved physical performance with SIT (ES 0.5 = 0.52; 95% credible intervals [CrI]: 0.42-0.62). Moderator analyses identified overlap between outcome types with the largest effects estimated for anaerobic outcomes (ES 0.5 = 0.61; 95% CrI: 0.48-0.75). Moderator effects were identified for intervention duration, sprint length, and number of sprints performed per session, with larger effects obtained for greater values of each moderator. A substantive number of very large effect sizes (41 SMDs > 2) were identified with additional evidence of extensive small study effects. This meta-analysis demonstrates that short-term SIT interventions are effective for developing moderate improvements in physical performance outcomes. However, extensive small study effects, likely influenced by researchers analyzing many outcomes, suggest potential overestimation of reported effects. Future research should analyze fewer a priori selected outcomes and investigate models to progress SIT interventions for longer-term performance improvements.
霍尔、阿斯佩、克雷格、卡瓦利亚乌卡斯、巴布雷、斯温顿。冲刺间歇训练对身体表现的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。J 强能力研究 37(2):457-481,2023-本研究旨在综合已发表研究的结果,并通过荟萃分析量化冲刺间歇训练(SIT)对健康成年人身体表现结果的影响(分为有氧、无氧、混合有氧-无氧或肌肉力量),并评估纳入研究的方法学质量和小研究效应的存在。共有 55 项研究纳入(50%方法学质量中等,42%方法学质量低),其中 42%的研究干预持续时间≤4 周,采用了多种不同的训练方案。标准化均数差(SMD)的贝叶斯荟萃分析确定了 SIT 对身体表现的改善具有中等效果(ES0.5=0.52;95%可信区间[CrI]:0.42-0.62)。通过调节分析发现,结果类型之间存在重叠,最大的效果估计是无氧结果(ES0.5=0.61;95%CrI:0.48-0.75)。干预持续时间、冲刺长度和每次训练的冲刺次数都对调节作用有影响,每个调节因素的值越大,效果越大。有大量非常大的效应量(41 个 SMD>2)被确定,并有大量额外的小研究效应的证据。这项荟萃分析表明,短期 SIT 干预对提高身体表现结果有显著效果。然而,大量的小研究效应,可能是由于研究人员分析了许多结果,这表明报告的效应可能被高估了。未来的研究应该分析更少的事先选定的结果,并研究模型,以实现长期的表现提高。