Wei Chao, An Jing, Zhou Lin
School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0327561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327561. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of 8 weeks of sprint interval training (SIT) on repeated sprinting ability and specialized performance in collegiate volleyball players.
Twenty-eight male collegiate volleyball players were randomly assigned to sprint interval training (SIT, n = 14) or high-intensity interval training (HIIT, n = 14) groups. The SIT group performed all-out sprints (6 × 30m with 30s rest) twice weekly in addition to regular volleyball training, while the HIIT group underwent high-intensity interval training alongside identical regular volleyball training. Repeated sprint ability (ideal sprint time IS, total sprint time TS, and performance decrement PD), aerobic capacity (VO₂max, velocity at VO₂max [vVO₂max], ventilatory thresholds VT1 and VT2), and volleyball-specific abilities (modified agility T-test, countermovement vertical jump [CMVJ], and spike jump [SPJ]) were assessed before and after the intervention.
Following the intervention, the SIT group showed significantly greater improvements than the HIIT group in VO₂max (46.93 ± 4.25 vs 50.90 ± 4.17 ml/min/kg, p < 0.001), vVO₂max (14.53 ± 1.61 vs 17.03 ± 1.15 km/h, p < 0.001), VT1 (69.61 ± 4.22% vs 74.43 ± 5.25%, p < 0.001), modified agility T-test (7.85 ± 1.04 vs 6.87 ± 0.71s, p < 0.001), CMVJ (35.77 ± 3.91 vs 40.14 ± 2.82 cm, p < 0.001), and SPJ (61.20 ± 3.92 vs 65.57 ± 2.64 cm, p < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in IS and TS (p < 0.05), with larger effect sizes observed in the SIT group (IS: 1.060 vs 0.581; TS: 1.164 vs 0.678). No significant between-group differences were found in PD and VT2.
Eight weeks of sprint interval training effectively enhances repeated sprinting ability, aerobic capacity, and specialized skills in collegiate volleyball players, with particularly notable improvements in vertical jumping ability and agility. These findings suggest that SIT represents an effective and time-efficient training method for improving volleyball performance.
本研究旨在调查8周的短跑间歇训练(SIT)对大学生排球运动员反复冲刺能力和专项表现的影响。
28名男性大学生排球运动员被随机分为短跑间歇训练组(SIT,n = 14)或高强度间歇训练组(HIIT,n = 14)。SIT组除常规排球训练外,每周进行两次全力冲刺(6×30米,休息30秒),而HIIT组在相同的常规排球训练的同时进行高强度间歇训练。在干预前后评估反复冲刺能力(理想冲刺时间IS、总冲刺时间TS和表现下降PD)、有氧能力(最大摄氧量VO₂max、最大摄氧量时的速度[vVO₂max]、通气阈值VT1和VT2)以及排球专项能力(改良敏捷T测试、反向纵跳[CMVJ]和扣球跳[SPJ])。
干预后,SIT组在最大摄氧量(46.93±4.25 vs 50.90±4.17毫升/分钟/千克,p < 0.001)、vVO₂max(14.53±1.61 vs 17.03±1.15千米/小时,p < 0.001)、VT1(69.61±4.22% vs 74.43±5.25%,p < 0.001)、改良敏捷T测试(7.85±1.04 vs 6.87±0.71秒,p < 0.001)、CMVJ(35.77±3.91 vs 40.14±2.82厘米,p < 0.001)和SPJ(61.20±3.92 vs 65.57±2.64厘米,p < 0.001)方面的改善明显大于HIIT组。两组在IS和TS方面均有显著改善(p < 0.05),且SIT组的效应量更大(IS:1.060 vs 0.581;TS:1.164 vs 0.678)。在PD和VT2方面未发现组间显著差异。
8周的短跑间歇训练有效地提高了大学生排球运动员的反复冲刺能力、有氧能力和专项技能,在垂直跳跃能力和敏捷性方面有特别显著的改善。这些发现表明,SIT是一种提高排球表现的有效且省时的训练方法。