University Centre for Health Promotion RESO, Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle-aux-champs 30, B1.30.14, 1200 Woluwé-St-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium.
Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle-aux-champs 30, B1.30.13, 1200 Woluwé--St-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium.
Health Promot Int. 2022 Oct 1;37(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac136.
This scoping review aims to give a narrative account of existing realist evaluation practices in health promotion. Realist evaluations of health promotion interventions published between 2010 and 2021 were identified by searching five academic databases: Embase, Pubmed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect and Scopus. A data-charting form was created based on the characteristics of realist evaluation and four core features of an approach appropriate for evaluating health promotion interventions. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. These were classified into two types of studies: those aiming to build an initial program theory and those aiming to test an initial program theory. Our results revealed a great variety of realist evaluation practices and uncovered a growing interest in realist evaluation over the years. Our searches identified a lack of participative practice and capacity-building intention. Our examination of the data collection and analysis methods points to some common practices in using multi-methods. Perspectives on realist evaluation practices and on assessing the effectiveness of health promotion have been identified.
本范围综述旨在对现有的健康促进领域中的实际评估实践进行叙述性描述。通过检索五个学术数据库：Embase、Pubmed、PsycINFO、ScienceDirect 和 Scopus，确定了 2010 年至 2021 年间发表的健康促进干预措施的实际评估。根据实际评估的特点和适合评估健康促进干预措施的四个核心特征，创建了一个数据图表形式。17 篇文章符合纳入标准。这些文章分为两类：旨在构建初始方案理论的研究和旨在测试初始方案理论的研究。我们的结果显示了实际评估实践的多样性，并揭示了多年来对实际评估的兴趣日益浓厚。我们的检索发现缺乏参与式实践和能力建设的意图。我们对数据收集和分析方法的检查表明，在使用多方法方面存在一些共同做法。对实际评估实践和健康促进效果评估的观点已经确定。
