• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米开朗基罗效应内部:艺术和美学吸引力在虚拟绘画中对手疲劳和运动学的影响。

Inside the Michelangelo effect: The role of art and aesthetic attractiveness on perceived fatigue and hand kinematics in virtual painting.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):748-754. doi: 10.1002/pchj.606. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1002/pchj.606
PMID:36168965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9827837/
Abstract

It has recently been discovered that during a virtual reality task of painting, if the subjects have the illusion of recreating an artistic masterpiece, they improve their performances and perceive less fatigue compared to simply coloring a virtual canvas. This phenomenon has been called the Michelangelo effect. However, it was unclear if this effect was related to the aesthetic experience of beauty or if it was specific to artistic stimuli. To clarify this point, 26 healthy subjects performed the virtual task of erasing a blank sheet on the canvas, revealing an image that could be a painting or a photo, classified as beautiful or not. Beautiful paintings were famous artistic portraits, non-beautiful paintings were rough reproductions of them. Photos of popular people were matched with paintings according to their similarity for somatic traits, posture, and clothes. Beautiful and non-beautiful photos were classified according to whether the pictured person was famous or not for their beauty. For each stimulus the objective beauty, subjective beauty, and effort to complete the task perceived by the subject were self-assessed on a numerical rating scale, recorded and analyzed. Furthermore, the hand kinematic trajectory was instrumentally recorded and its spatiotemporal parameters were computed. Less fatigue was perceived for the paintings than for the photos (p = .020), but not for beautiful versus non-beautiful stimuli (p = .325). Only in the artistic stimuli, subjective beauty was found to be negatively correlated with perceived fatigue (p = .030) and performed errors (p = .005). The kinematic parameters were found to be affected by the interactions between the gender of the participant and that of the person in the photo. These results supported the idea that the Michelangelo effect was stronger when subjects interacted with artefacts, modulated by the perceived beauty of the artistic stimulus.

摘要

最近发现,在虚拟现实绘画任务中,如果主体有再现艺术杰作的幻觉,他们的表现会提高,与简单地给虚拟画布上色相比,他们会感到更少的疲劳。这种现象被称为米开朗基罗效应。然而,不清楚这种效应是否与美感的审美体验有关,或者是否与艺术刺激有关。为了澄清这一点,26 名健康受试者进行了虚拟任务,即在画布上擦除空白,揭示出可以是绘画或照片的图像,将其分为美丽或不美丽。美丽的画作是著名的艺术肖像,不美丽的画作是它们的粗糙复制品。根据躯体特征、姿势和服装的相似性,将流行人物的照片与画作相匹配。根据照片中的人是否因美貌而出名,将美丽和不美丽的照片进行分类。对于每个刺激,主体自我评估客观美、主观美和完成任务的努力程度,并记录和分析。此外,还记录了手部运动轨迹,并计算了其时空参数。绘画比照片感知到的疲劳程度更低(p = 0.020),但对于美丽与不美丽的刺激(p = 0.325)则没有。只有在艺术刺激中,主观美与感知疲劳(p = 0.030)和执行错误(p = 0.005)呈负相关。发现运动参数受到参与者性别和照片中人物性别之间相互作用的影响。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即当主体与艺术品互动时,米开朗基罗效应更强,而这种效应受到艺术刺激感知美的调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf73/9827837/aab3d3d6e42b/PCHJ-11-748-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf73/9827837/0df6becf61bc/PCHJ-11-748-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf73/9827837/aab3d3d6e42b/PCHJ-11-748-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf73/9827837/0df6becf61bc/PCHJ-11-748-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf73/9827837/aab3d3d6e42b/PCHJ-11-748-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inside the Michelangelo effect: The role of art and aesthetic attractiveness on perceived fatigue and hand kinematics in virtual painting.米开朗基罗效应内部:艺术和美学吸引力在虚拟绘画中对手疲劳和运动学的影响。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):748-754. doi: 10.1002/pchj.606. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
2
Virtual Art Therapy: Application of Michelangelo Effect to Neurorehabilitation of Patients with Stroke.虚拟艺术疗法:米开朗基罗效应在中风患者神经康复中的应用。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 29;12(7):2590. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072590.
3
The Michelangelo Effect: Art Improves the Performance in a Virtual Reality Task Developed for Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation.米开朗基罗效应:艺术提升了为上肢神经康复开发的虚拟现实任务中的表现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:611956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611956. eCollection 2020.
4
Beautiful on the inside: Aesthetic preferences and the skeletal complexity of shapes.内在之美:审美偏好与形状的骨骼复杂性。
Perception. 2022 Dec;51(12):904-918. doi: 10.1177/03010066221124872.
5
The Benslimane's Artistic Model for Females' Gaze Beauty: An Original Assessment Tool.本斯利曼女性凝视美的艺术模型:一种原创评估工具。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Feb;41(1):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0721-y. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Is better beautiful or is beautiful better? Exploring the relationship between beauty and category structure.美更好还是更好的美?探索美与范畴结构的关系。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):566-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0356-1.
7
Beauty in abstract paintings: perceptual contrast and statistical properties.抽象画中的美:感知对比和统计特性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 21;8:161. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00161. eCollection 2014.
8
Michelangelo Effect in Virtual Sculpturing: Prospective for Motor Neurorehabilitation in the Metaverse.虚拟雕刻中的米开朗基罗效应:元宇宙中运动神经康复的前景
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 29;7(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.345. eCollection 2024.
9
Neural correlates of beauty.美的神经关联。
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1699-705. doi: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003.
10
The golden ratio as an ecological affordance leading to aesthetic attractiveness.黄金比例作为一种生态可供性,导致了美学吸引力。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):729-740. doi: 10.1002/pchj.505. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
An investigation of improving validity in upper limb measurements for people with tetraplegia using construct specification equations.使用结构规范方程对提高四肢瘫痪患者上肢测量有效性的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98626-4.
2
Factors Influencing Virtual Art Therapy in Patients with Stroke.影响中风患者虚拟艺术治疗的因素。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 9;15(7):736. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070736.
3
Applying a Virtual Art Therapy System Based on the Michelangelo Effect in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgments of mathematical beauty are resistant to revision through external opinion.人们对于数学之美的判断不易受外界观点影响而改变。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):741-747. doi: 10.1002/pchj.556. Epub 2022 May 1.
2
Gender Influences Virtual Reality-Based Recovery of Cognitive Functions in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.性别对创伤性脑损伤患者基于虚拟现实的认知功能恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
Brain Sci. 2022 Apr 12;12(4):491. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040491.
3
The golden ratio as an ecological affordance leading to aesthetic attractiveness.
在脊髓损伤患者中应用基于米开朗基罗效应的虚拟艺术治疗系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;25(13):4173. doi: 10.3390/s25134173.
4
Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Protocol Based on Art Therapy in Patients with Stroke: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.基于艺术疗法的虚拟现实康复方案对中风患者的疗效:一项单盲随机对照试验
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 27;14(9):863. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090863.
5
Michelangelo Effect in Cognitive Rehabilitation: Using Art in a Digital Visuospatial Memory Task.认知康复中的米开朗基罗效应:在数字视觉空间记忆任务中运用艺术
Brain Sci. 2024 May 9;14(5):479. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050479.
6
Michelangelo Effect in Virtual Sculpturing: Prospective for Motor Neurorehabilitation in the Metaverse.虚拟雕刻中的米开朗基罗效应:元宇宙中运动神经康复的前景
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 29;7(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.345. eCollection 2024.
7
Virtual Art Therapy: Application of Michelangelo Effect to Neurorehabilitation of Patients with Stroke.虚拟艺术疗法:米开朗基罗效应在中风患者神经康复中的应用。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 29;12(7):2590. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072590.
黄金比例作为一种生态可供性,导致了美学吸引力。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):729-740. doi: 10.1002/pchj.505. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Greater art classification does not necessarily predict better liking: Evidence from graffiti and other visual arts.更高的艺术分类并不一定预示着更强烈的喜爱:来自涂鸦和其他视觉艺术的证据。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):656-659. doi: 10.1002/pchj.473. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Visceromotor roots of aesthetic evaluation of pain in art: an fMRI study.艺术中疼痛审美评估的内脏运动根:一项 fMRI 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):1113-1122. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab066.
6
Nature versus art as elicitors of the sublime: A virtual reality study.自然与艺术作为崇高的诱发因素:一项虚拟现实研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 22;16(3):e0233628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233628. eCollection 2021.
7
The Michelangelo Effect: Art Improves the Performance in a Virtual Reality Task Developed for Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation.米开朗基罗效应:艺术提升了为上肢神经康复开发的虚拟现实任务中的表现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:611956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611956. eCollection 2020.
8
The differential power of extraneous influences to modify aesthetic judgments of biological and artifactual stimuli.外在影响对修改对生物和人工刺激的审美判断的差异作用。
Psych J. 2021 Apr;10(2):190-199. doi: 10.1002/pchj.415. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture.对自然审美领域的共同喜好强于对人类文化制品的喜好。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
10
Behavioral and autonomic responses to real and digital reproductions of works of art.对艺术作品的真实和数字复制品的行为及自主反应。
Prog Brain Res. 2018;237:201-221. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Apr 30.