Kiely Bridget T, Koch Rebecca L, Flores Leticia, Burner Danielle, Kaplan Samantha, Kishnani Priya S
Duke University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Durham, NC, United States.
Medical Center Library and Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Genet. 2022 Sep 13;13:992406. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.992406. eCollection 2022.
Glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) has historically been divided into discrete hepatic (classic hepatic, non-progressive hepatic) and neuromuscular (perinatal-congenital neuromuscular, juvenile neuromuscular) subtypes. However, the extent to which this subtype-based classification system accurately captures the landscape of phenotypic variation among GSD IV patients has not been systematically assessed. This study synthesized clinical data from all eligible cases of GSD IV in the published literature to evaluate whether this disorder is better conceptualized as discrete subtypes or a clinical continuum. A novel phenotypic scoring approach was applied to characterize the extent of hepatic, neuromuscular, and cardiac involvement in each eligible patient. 146 patients met all inclusion criteria. The majority (61%) of those with sufficient data to be scored exhibited phenotypes that were not fully consistent with any of the established subtypes. These included patients who exhibited combined hepatic-neuromuscular involvement; patients whose phenotypes were intermediate between the established hepatic or neuromuscular subtypes; and patients who presented with predominantly cardiac disease. The application of this novel phenotypic scoring approach showed that-in contrast to the traditional subtype-based view-GSD IV may be better conceptualized as a multidimensional clinical continuum, whereby hepatic, neuromuscular, and cardiac involvement occur to varying degrees in different patients.
IV型糖原贮积病(GSD IV)在历史上一直被分为不同的肝脏亚型(经典肝脏型、非进行性肝脏型)和神经肌肉亚型(围产期先天性神经肌肉型、青少年神经肌肉型)。然而,这种基于亚型的分类系统在多大程度上准确反映了GSD IV患者的表型变异情况,尚未得到系统评估。本研究综合了已发表文献中所有符合条件的GSD IV病例的临床数据,以评估这种疾病是否更宜被理解为不同的亚型或一个临床连续体。一种新的表型评分方法被用于描述每个符合条件患者的肝脏、神经肌肉和心脏受累程度。146名患者符合所有纳入标准。在有足够数据可进行评分的患者中,大多数(61%)表现出的表型与任何已确立的亚型都不完全一致。这些患者包括表现出肝脏 - 神经肌肉联合受累的患者;表型处于已确立的肝脏或神经肌肉亚型之间的患者;以及主要表现为心脏疾病的患者。这种新的表型评分方法的应用表明,与传统的基于亚型的观点不同,GSD IV可能更宜被理解为一个多维临床连续体,不同患者的肝脏、神经肌肉和心脏受累程度各不相同。