Gayed Matthew M, Sgobbi Paulo, Pinto Wladimir Bocca Viera De Rezende, Kishnani Priya S, Koch Rebecca L
Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Division of Neuromuscular Diseases, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Front Genet. 2023 Dec 18;14:1282790. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1282790. eCollection 2023.
Adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD) has long been regarded as the adult-onset form of glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) and is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in . Advances in the understanding of the natural history of APBD published in recent years have led to the use of discrete descriptors ("typical" versus "atypical") based on adherence to traditional symptomatology and homozygosity for the p.Y329S variant. Although these general descriptors are helpful in summarizing common findings and symptoms in APBD, they are inherently limited and may affect disease recognition in diverse populations. This case series includes three American patients (cases 1-3) and four Brazilian patients (cases 4-7) diagnosed with APBD. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were employed to evaluate pain, fatigue, and quality of life in cases 1-3. We describe the clinical course and diagnostic odyssey of seven cases of APBD that challenge the utility and efficacy of discrete descriptors. Cases 1-3 are compound heterozygotes that harbor the previously identified deep intronic variant in and presented with "typical" APBD phenotypically, despite lacking two copies of the pathogenic p.Y329S variant. Patient-reported outcome measures in these three cases revealed the moderate levels of pain and fatigue as well as an impacted quality of life. Cases 4-7 have unique genotypic profiles and emphasize the growing recognition of presentations of APBD in diverse populations with broad neurological manifestations. Collectively, these cases underscore the understanding of APBD as a spectrum disorder existing on the GSD IV phenotypic continuum. We draw attention to the pitfalls of commonly used genetic testing methods when diagnosing APBD and highlight the utility of patient-reported outcome questionnaires in managing this disease.
成人多聚葡萄糖体病(APBD)长期以来一直被视为成人发病型IV型糖原贮积病(GSD IV),由……中的双等位基因致病变异引起。近年来发表的关于APBD自然史认识的进展导致基于对传统症状学的遵循以及p.Y329S变异的纯合性使用离散描述符(“典型”与“非典型”)。尽管这些一般描述符有助于总结APBD的常见发现和症状,但它们本质上是有限的,可能会影响不同人群中的疾病识别。本病例系列包括三名被诊断为APBD的美国患者(病例1 - 3)和四名巴西患者(病例4 - 7)。采用患者报告结局(PRO)测量方法评估病例1 - 3中的疼痛、疲劳和生活质量。我们描述了七例APBD的临床病程和诊断历程,这些病例对离散描述符的实用性和有效性提出了挑战。病例1 - 3是复合杂合子,在……中携带先前鉴定的内含子深处变异,尽管缺乏致病p.Y329S变异的两个拷贝,但在表型上呈现“典型”APBD。这三例患者报告结局测量结果显示疼痛和疲劳程度中等,生活质量受到影响。病例4 - 7具有独特的基因型谱,并强调在具有广泛神经学表现的不同人群中对APBD表现的认识不断增加。总体而言,这些病例强调了将APBD理解为存在于GSD IV表型连续体上的谱系障碍。我们提请注意诊断APBD时常用基因检测方法的陷阱,并强调患者报告结局问卷在管理这种疾病中的实用性。