Department of Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of Labour and Social Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Department of Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 30;17(9):e0274878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274878. eCollection 2022.
The collection of biographical information (biodata) through CVs and application forms has many advantages, namely easiness of collection, acceptable validity, less prone to faking, and the fulfilment of legal requirements. However, its systematic use among practitioners is scarce. Two of the mains reasons is the overlap with other constructs like personality and the lack of validated biodata scales in articles and public repositories. Aimed to fill this gap, García-Izquierdo and colleagues developed an 8-item scale able to generate positive applicant reactions, but they did not provide empirical evidence that their scale is able to predict job performance. The present paper was developed for this purpose, investigating the scale's relationship with four different dimensions of job performance (i.e., task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive behaviors, and adaptive performance) and its incremental validity with respect to Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits. The study comprises 528 employees from different organizations (Mage = 39.51, SD = 14.25; 52.8% women, Mexperience = 17.06, SD = 13.27) which voluntarily agreed to participate filling a questionnaire with the variables of interest. Results provide evidence of the predictive validity of the biodata scale in a multi-occupational sample; identify that these biodata contribute to predicting two specific types of job performance: contextual performance and adaptive performance; shows that a brief job-related biodata scale achieves results comparable to those of most personality traits in predictive models of job performance dimensions; and provide evidence of the incremental predictive validity of biodata over the Big Five and the Dark Tetrad. As a whole, these results provide support for the use of the scale in researcher and applied settings, and contributes to the advance the knowledge of biodata for personnel selection.
通过简历和申请表收集传记信息(生物数据)有很多优点,即易于收集、可接受的有效性、不易伪造,并且符合法律要求。然而,从业者系统地使用它的情况很少。其中两个主要原因是它与个性等其他结构的重叠,以及在文章和公共存储库中缺乏经过验证的生物数据量表。为了填补这一空白,García-Izquierdo 及其同事开发了一个 8 项量表,能够产生积极的申请人反应,但他们没有提供证据表明他们的量表能够预测工作绩效。本文旨在为此目的而开发,研究了该量表与工作绩效的四个不同维度(即任务绩效、背景绩效、反生产行为和适应性绩效)的关系,以及与大五和黑暗四天王人格特质相比的增量有效性。该研究包括来自不同组织的 528 名员工(Mage = 39.51, SD = 14.25; 52.8%女性,Mexperience = 17.06, SD = 13.27),他们自愿同意参与填写一份问卷,其中包含感兴趣的变量。结果提供了多职业样本中生物数据量表的预测有效性的证据;确定这些生物数据有助于预测两种特定类型的工作绩效:背景绩效和适应性绩效;表明一个简短的与工作相关的生物数据量表在工作绩效维度的预测模型中可以取得与大多数人格特质相当的结果;并提供了生物数据在大五和黑暗四天王之上对预测模型的增量预测有效性的证据。总的来说,这些结果为在研究和应用环境中使用该量表提供了支持,并为人员选拔中的生物数据知识的发展做出了贡献。