AIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Parasitology, National Institutes of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS Pathog. 2022 Sep 30;18(9):e1010880. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010880. eCollection 2022 Sep.
The severity of Entamoeba histolytica infection is determined by host immunology, pathogen virulence, and the intestinal environment. Conventional research for assessing pathogen virulence has been mainly performed using laboratory strains, such as a virulent HM-1: IMSS (HM-1) and an avirulent Rahman, under various artificial environmental conditions because of the difficulties of axenic isolation of the clinical strains. However, it is still unclear whether scientific knowledge based on laboratory strains are universally applicable to the true pathogenesis. Hereby, we performed transcriptomic analysis of clinical strains from patients with different degrees of disease severity, as well as HM-1 under different conditions. Even after several months of axenization, Clinical strains show the distinct profile in gene expression during in vitro passage, moreover, difference between any 2 of these strains was much greater than the changes on the liver challenge. Interestingly, 26 DEGs, which were closely related to the biological functions, were oppositely up- or down regulated between virulent Ax 19 (liver abscess) and avirulent Ax 11 (asymptomatic carrier). Additionally, RNAseq using laboratory strain (HM1) showed more than half of genes were differently expressed between continuously in vitro passaged HM1 (in vitro HM1) and periodically liver passaged HM1 (virulent HM1), which was much greater than the changes on the liver passage of virulent HM1. Also, transcriptomic analysis of a laboratory strain revealed that continuous environmental stress enhances its virulence via a shift in its gene expression profile. Changes in gene expression patterns on liver abscess formation were not consistent between clinical and laboratory strains.
溶组织内阿米巴感染的严重程度取决于宿主免疫、病原体毒力和肠道环境。由于临床株的无菌分离困难,评估病原体毒力的传统研究主要使用实验室株,如强毒 HM-1:IMSS(HM-1)和无毒 Rahman,在各种人工环境条件下进行。然而,基于实验室菌株的科学知识是否普遍适用于真实的发病机制仍不清楚。因此,我们对来自不同疾病严重程度患者的临床株以及不同条件下的 HM-1 进行了转录组分析。即使经过几个月的无菌分离,临床株在体外传代过程中的基因表达仍然表现出明显的特征,而且这些菌株中的任何两个之间的差异都比在肝脏挑战中的变化大得多。有趣的是,26 个差异表达基因(DEGs)与生物学功能密切相关,在毒力 Ax19(肝脓肿)和无毒 Ax11(无症状携带者)之间呈相反的上调或下调。此外,使用实验室株(HM1)进行 RNAseq 显示,连续体外传代的 HM1(体外 HM1)和周期性肝脏传代的 HM1(毒力 HM1)之间有一半以上的基因表达不同,这比毒力 HM1 的肝脏传代变化要大得多。此外,实验室株的转录组分析表明,连续的环境压力通过其基因表达谱的变化增强了其毒力。肝脏脓肿形成过程中基因表达模式的变化在临床株和实验室株之间并不一致。