• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Robotic surgery: getting the evidence right.机器人手术：获取正确的证据。
Med J Aust. 2022 Oct 17;217(8):391-393. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51726. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
2
Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌：一项随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery (NOTR) for patients with colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人经自然腔道标本取出术与传统机器人辅助手术（NOTR）治疗结直肠癌患者的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Feb 6;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05077-z.
4
Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.成人经腹机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 4;4(4):CD011387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011387.pub2.
5
[Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较：一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):377-383. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190401-00135.
6
[Can robotic rectal cancer surgery improve quality of total mesorectal excision?].[机器人直肠癌手术能否提高全直肠系膜切除的质量？]
Rozhl Chir. 2017 Winter;96(2):69-74.
7
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is a feasible method for resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis, especially in the rectosigmoid area.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术是一种可行的深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症切除术方法，特别是在直肠乙状结肠区域。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Aug;49(8):3000605211032788. doi: 10.1177/03000605211032788.
8
Anesthesia experience of pediatric robotic surgery in a University Hospital.大学医院小儿机器人手术的麻醉体验。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):141-146. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0834-1. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
9
Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗临床Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):474.e1-474.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.104. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.手术平台是否会影响复发和生存？子宫内膜癌手术中多端口、单端口和机器人辅助腹腔镜应用的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):243.e1-243.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding the boundaries of minimally invasive surgery: the feasibility of robotic natural orifice transluminal extraction colectomy and robotic no-incision colectomy in colorectal practice.拓展微创手术的边界：机器人经自然腔道取标本结肠切除术及机器人无切口结肠切除术在结直肠手术中的可行性
Ann Coloproctol. 2025 Aug;41(4):346-353. doi: 10.3393/ac.2025.00647.0092. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
2
Fenestrated endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤的开窗式血管腔内修复术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 28;5(5):CD014226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014226.pub2.
3
A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients.一项综述与荟萃分析：比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02323-3.
4
The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring.手术机器人的 IDEAL 框架：开发、比较评估和长期监测。
Nat Med. 2024 Jan;30(1):61-75. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Surgical outcomes and cost analysis of a multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery caseload in the Australian public health system.澳大利亚公立医疗体系中多专科机器人辅助手术的手术结果和成本分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01643-6. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
Best practice considerations on the assessment of robotic assisted surgical systems: results from an international consensus expert panel.关于评估机器人辅助手术系统的最佳实践考虑因素：国际共识专家小组的结果。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jun 5;39(1):e39. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000314.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与体外尿路分流术对比开放性根治性膀胱切除术对膀胱癌患者 90 天内发病率和死亡率的影响：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 7;327(21):2092-2103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393.
2
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: 12-month Outcomes of the Multicentre Randomised Controlled LAP-01 Trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术：多中心随机对照LAP-01试验的12个月结果
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
3
Effect of a Randomized, Controlled Trial on Surgery for Cervical Cancer.一项关于宫颈癌手术的随机对照试验的效果
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 29;384(17):1669-1671. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2035819.
4
Detailed cost of robotic-assisted surgery in the Australian public health sector: from implementation to a multi-specialty caseload.澳大利亚公立卫生系统中机器人辅助手术的详细成本：从实施到多专科病例量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06105-z.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial.机器人与腹腔镜腹外疝修补术的比较：多中心、盲法随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 14;370:m2457. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2457.
6
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术：RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
7
Intellectual Equipoise and Challenges: Accruing Patients With Advanced Cancer to a Trial Randomizing to Surgical or Nonsurgical Management (SWOG S1316).智力均衡与挑战：将晚期癌症患者纳入一项随机分为手术或非手术治疗的试验（SWOG S1316）。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Jan;37(1):12-18. doi: 10.1177/1049909119851471. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Comparison of Population-Based Observational Studies With Randomized Trials in Oncology.基于人群的观察性研究与肿瘤学随机试验的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1209-1216. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01074. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术加体内尿流改道术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术（iROC）：一项带有内部可行性研究的随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 8;8(8):e020500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020500.

Robotic surgery: getting the evidence right.

作者信息

Tan Wei Shen, Ta Anthony, Kelly John D

机构信息

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2022 Oct 17;217(8):391-393. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51726. Epub 2022 Oct 2.

DOI:10.5694/mja2.51726
PMID:36183333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9828009/
Abstract
摘要