Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA; Department of Sports Medicine and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, 3600 Atwood Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Nov;155:465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
Sleep-wake disturbances in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis may relate to increased symptom severity and contribute to disease progression. Here, we examined differences in rest-activity rhythms (RAR) measures, derived from actigraphy, and objective sleep outcomes, derived from electroencephalography (EEG), between 12 CHR and 16 healthy comparison (HC) individuals. Further, we examined the relationships between RAR disturbances, objective sleep outcomes and clinical psychosis symptoms (i.e., negative, positive, disorganized, general symptoms). Sleep-wake behaviors were monitored via actigraphy for 3-7 days (CHR: 5.7 ± 1.7 days; HC: 6.3 ± 1.2 days) prior to participants spending a night in the sleep laboratory, which was monitored with EEG. Separate regressions were used to examine the effect of clinical group on RAR measures and objective sleep outcomes after controlling for age and gender. CHR participants were found to be less active, specifically during the evening (17:00-20:00; β = 1.145, SE = 0.362, p = .004) and nighttime (21:00-24:00; β = 1.152, SE = 0.326, p = .002) relative to HC. Further, CHR participants had more fragmented sleep (wake after sleep onset: β = 0.888, SE = 0.395, p = .034) and more hyperarousal during sleep (NREM gamma activity: β = 1.087, SE = 0.348, p = .005), but these sleep disturbances were not related to reduced activity or clinical symptoms, whereas lower nighttime activity was related to more disorganized symptoms (ρ = -.640, p = .025). Thus, increasing activity through behavioral interventions may have additional beneficial effects on CHR clinical symptoms.
处于精神病临床高风险(CHR)的个体的睡眠-觉醒障碍可能与症状严重程度增加有关,并导致疾病进展。在这里,我们研究了 12 名 CHR 和 16 名健康对照(HC)个体的活动记录仪(actigraphy)得出的静息-活动节律(RAR)测量值和脑电图(EEG)得出的客观睡眠结果之间的差异。此外,我们还研究了 RAR 紊乱与客观睡眠结果以及临床精神病症状(即阴性、阳性、紊乱、一般症状)之间的关系。在参与者入住睡眠实验室之前,通过活动记录仪监测睡眠-觉醒行为 3-7 天(CHR:5.7 ± 1.7 天;HC:6.3 ± 1.2 天),脑电图监测睡眠实验室。在控制年龄和性别后,使用单独的回归来检查临床组对 RAR 测量值和客观睡眠结果的影响。与 HC 相比,CHR 参与者的活动量较少,特别是在傍晚(17:00-20:00;β=1.145,SE=0.362,p=0.004)和夜间(21:00-24:00;β=1.152,SE=0.326,p=0.002)。此外,CHR 参与者的睡眠碎片化更多(睡眠后觉醒:β=0.888,SE=0.395,p=0.034),睡眠期间的唤醒更多(NREM 伽马活动:β=1.087,SE=0.348,p=0.005),但这些睡眠障碍与活动减少或临床症状无关,而夜间活动减少与更多的紊乱症状有关(ρ=-.640,p=0.025)。因此,通过行为干预增加活动可能对 CHR 临床症状有额外的有益影响。