• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在体外放射治疗的物理计划审查过程中检测到的错误。

Errors detected during physics plan review for external beam radiotherapy.

作者信息

Siebert Frank-André, Hirt Markus, Delaperrière Marc, Dunst Jürgen

机构信息

Clinic of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep 17;24:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.09.006. eCollection 2022 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2022.09.006
PMID:36185802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9519775/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Risk management in radiotherapy is of high importance. There is not much data published on errors occurring in the treatment planning process of external beam techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate errors occurring during physics plan review in external beam radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of 14 months errors observed during the physical review process are reported. The errors were grouped and evaluated regarding treatment machine, technique, and treatment site. In addition, a correlation between frequency of errors and staff shortage was analyzed.

RESULTS

Subgroups of grave errors (g-errors) and slight errors (s-errors) were defined to consider the different impact on the patient and clinical workflow of the errors. In 1056 plans reviewed, 110 errors (41 g-errors, 69 s-errors) were detected. The most common g-errors and s-errors were "Wrong gantry angle at setup field" (n = 19) and "Wrong field label" (n = 24), respectively. A correlation of number of errors and treatment machine, technique, or anatomical site could not be found. No correlation between staff shortage and number of errors was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The process of reviewing treatment plans is a relevant topic to consider in risk analysis of the radiotherapy workflow. The review process could be improved by enhancements in the treatment planning systems, use of digital dose prescription, and treatment planning templates.

摘要

背景与目的

放射治疗中的风险管理至关重要。关于外照射技术治疗计划过程中出现的误差,发表的数据不多。本研究的目的是调查外照射放射治疗物理计划审核过程中出现的误差。

材料与方法

报告了在14个月期间物理审核过程中观察到的误差。根据治疗机器、技术和治疗部位对误差进行分组和评估。此外,还分析了误差频率与人员短缺之间的相关性。

结果

定义了严重误差(g误差)和轻微误差(s误差)亚组,以考虑误差对患者和临床工作流程的不同影响。在审核的1056个计划中,检测到110个误差(41个g误差,69个s误差)。最常见的g误差和s误差分别是“设置射野时机架角度错误”(n = 19)和“射野标签错误”(n = 24)。未发现误差数量与治疗机器、技术或解剖部位之间存在相关性。未观察到人员短缺与误差数量之间存在相关性。

结论

治疗计划审核过程是放射治疗工作流程风险分析中需要考虑的一个相关主题。可通过改进治疗计划系统、使用数字剂量处方和治疗计划模板来改善审核过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7299/9519775/e58770c917c1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7299/9519775/39b373dbac70/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7299/9519775/e58770c917c1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7299/9519775/39b373dbac70/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7299/9519775/e58770c917c1/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Errors detected during physics plan review for external beam radiotherapy.在体外放射治疗的物理计划审查过程中检测到的错误。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep 17;24:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.09.006. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Optimizing efficiency and safety in external beam radiotherapy using automated plan check (APC) tool and six sigma methodology.使用自动化计划检查(APC)工具和六西格玛方法优化外照射放射治疗的效率和安全性。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):56-64. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12678.
3
Impact of the gradient in gantry-table rotation on dynamic trajectory radiotherapy plan quality.机架-治疗床旋转梯度对动态轨迹放射治疗计划质量的影响。
Med Phys. 2023 Nov;50(11):7104-7117. doi: 10.1002/mp.16749. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
Utilizing simulated errors in radiotherapy plans to quantify the effectiveness of the physics plan review.利用放射治疗计划中的模拟误差来量化物理计划审查的效果。
Med Phys. 2018 Dec;45(12):5359-5365. doi: 10.1002/mp.13242. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
5
Evaluation of Delta Anatomy in 3D Patient-Specific IMRT Quality Assurance.三维个体化调强放疗质量保证中 Delta 解剖结构的评估。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820945816. doi: 10.1177/1533033820945816.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The effectiveness of pretreatment physics plan review for detecting errors in radiation therapy.放疗前物理计划审核在检测放疗误差方面的有效性。
Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5181. doi: 10.1118/1.4961010.
8
A Swiss cheese error detection method for real-time EPID-based quality assurance and error prevention.一种用于基于实时电子射野影像装置的质量保证和差错预防的瑞士奶酪差错检测方法。
Med Phys. 2017 Apr;44(4):1212-1223. doi: 10.1002/mp.12142. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors.治疗复杂性和计算机控制给药技术对治疗给药错误的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Oct 1;42(3):651-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00244-2.
10
Error detection using EPID-based 3D in vivo dose verification for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.基于电子射野影像装置(EPID)的三维体内剂量验证在肺部立体定向体部放射治疗中的误差检测
Appl Radiat Isot. 2023 Feb;192:110567. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110567. Epub 2022 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A method for empirically validating FMEA RPN scores in a radiation oncology clinic using physics QC data.一种使用物理质量控制数据在放射肿瘤学临床中对 FMEA RPN 评分进行实证验证的方法。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Aug;25(8):e14391. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14391. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
ACPSEM position paper: pre-treatment patient specific plan checks and quality assurance in radiation oncology.澳大利亚临床肿瘤医师协会立场文件:放射肿瘤学中治疗前患者特定计划检查和质量保证。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024 Mar;47(1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01367-9. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to Evaluate Risk in the Clinical Adoption of Automated Contouring and Treatment Planning Tools.运用失效模式与影响分析评估自动化勾画和治疗计划工具在临床应用中的风险。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul-Aug;12(4):e344-e353. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
Evaluation of a prospective radiation oncology departmental team review process using standardized simulation directives.使用标准化模拟指令评估前瞻性放射肿瘤学部团队审查流程。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 May;170:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.028. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
3
Overview of artificial intelligence-based applications in radiotherapy: Recommendations for implementation and quality assurance.
人工智能在放射治疗中的应用概述:实施和质量保证建议。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275.放疗中物理计划和图表审查的有效策略:AAPM 工作组 275 报告。
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(6):e236-e272. doi: 10.1002/mp.14030. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Chasing Zero Harm in Radiation Oncology: Using Pre-treatment Peer Review.放射肿瘤学中追求零伤害:利用治疗前同行评审。
Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 24;9:302. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00302. eCollection 2019.
6
Characterization of a Bayesian network-based radiotherapy plan verification model.基于贝叶斯网络的放射治疗计划验证模型的特征描述。
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2006-2014. doi: 10.1002/mp.13515. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Utilizing simulated errors in radiotherapy plans to quantify the effectiveness of the physics plan review.利用放射治疗计划中的模拟误差来量化物理计划审查的效果。
Med Phys. 2018 Dec;45(12):5359-5365. doi: 10.1002/mp.13242. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
Early detection of potential errors during patient treatment planning.在患者治疗计划过程中对潜在错误进行早期检测。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Sep;19(5):724-732. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12388. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
Patient safety in external beam radiotherapy, results of the ACCIRAD project: Current status of proactive risk assessment, reactive analysis of events, and reporting and learning systems in Europe.体外放射治疗中的患者安全,ACCIRAD项目结果:欧洲主动风险评估、事件反应性分析以及报告与学习系统的现状
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Apr;123(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
10
Improving treatment plan evaluation with automation.通过自动化改进治疗计划评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):16-31. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6322.