Suppr超能文献

含7%精氨酸和0.12%壳聚糖的第八代粘结剂抗菌性能及微拉伸粘结强度的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of eighth-generation bonding agent modified with 7% arginine and 0.12% chitosan for antibacterial property and microtensile bond strength.

作者信息

Desai Himali Rajan, Mulay Sanjyot A, Shinde Ronit R, Shetty Pradeep K, Shetty Soumya S

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. D Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;25(4):440-443. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_189_22. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare eighth-generation bonding agent (G-Premio BOND) modified with 7% arginine and 0.12% chitosan for antibacterial property and microtensile bond strength.

METHODS

To evaluate antibacterial property, the sterile 96-microtiter plate was taken. The sidewalls of nine wells were coated with 15 μl of adhesive from each group. Suspension of bacteria was placed on each group of adhesive and antibacterial property was checked using Spectrophotometer. Thirty-three healthy extracted premolars were taken and adhesive from each group was applied on the exposed surface of dentin, and the specimens were tested using a universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.

RESULTS

The least antibacterial efficacy was seen with unmodified eighth-generation bonding agent. This result was statistically significant when all study groups were compared. Microtensile bond strength was evaluated and the highest mean value (5.07) was seen with adhesive modified with 7% arginine, followed by adhesive modified with 0.12% chitosan (mean value: 4.14), and unmodified adhesive had the lowest mean bond strength value (4.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The eighth-generation bonding agent modified with 7% arginine and 0.12% chitosan showed antibacterial efficacy against . In addition to this, they also had higher tensile bond strength values as compared to unmodified adhesive.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较用7%精氨酸和0.12%壳聚糖改性的第八代粘结剂(G-Premio BOND)的抗菌性能和微拉伸粘结强度。

方法

为评估抗菌性能,取无菌96孔微量滴定板。在九个孔的侧壁上分别涂布每组15μl的粘结剂。将细菌悬液置于每组粘结剂上,并用分光光度计检查抗菌性能。取33颗健康拔除的前磨牙,将每组粘结剂涂覆于牙本质暴露表面,使用万能试验机以1mm/min的十字头速度对标本进行测试。

结果

未改性的第八代粘结剂抗菌效果最差。当比较所有研究组时,该结果具有统计学意义。评估微拉伸粘结强度,7%精氨酸改性的粘结剂平均粘结强度最高(5.07),其次是0.12%壳聚糖改性的粘结剂(平均值:4.14),未改性的粘结剂平均粘结强度值最低(4.07)。

结论

用7%精氨酸和0.12%壳聚糖改性后的第八代粘结剂对……具有抗菌效果。除此之外,与未改性的粘结剂相比,它们还具有更高的拉伸粘结强度值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb2f/9520639/5cb3f7c5a908/JCD-25-440-g001.jpg

相似文献

4
Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength of Three Adhesive Systems.
Front Dent. 2022 Feb 6;19:8. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i8.8725. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessment of antibacterial properties of newer dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Jul;2(3):165-9. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.86444.
9
Antibacterial activity and bonding ability of an adhesive incorporating an antibacterial monomer DMAE-CB.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Aug;90(2):813-7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31350.

本文引用的文献

1
Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):1-17. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
2
A new arginine-based dental adhesive system: formulation, mechanical and anti-caries properties.
J Dent. 2017 Aug;63:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Effects of chlorhexidine-containing adhesives on the durability of resin-dentine interfaces.
J Dent. 2014 Jan;42(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验