• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心、单盲随机对照试验:比较功能性电刺激疗法与传统疗法治疗不完全性四肢瘫的疗效

Multi-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing functional electrical stimulation therapy to conventional therapy in incomplete tetraplegia.

作者信息

Anderson Kim D, Korupolu Radha, Musselman Kristin E, Pierce Jacqueline, Wilson James R, Yozbatiran Nuray, Desai Naaz, Popovic Milos R, Thabane Lehana

机构信息

MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Sep 9;3:995244. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.995244. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fresc.2022.995244
PMID:36188946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9500231/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loss of upper extremity function after tetraplegia results in significant disability. Emerging evidence from pilot studies suggests that functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy may enhance recovery of upper extremity function after tetraplegia. The aim of this trial was to determine the effectiveness of FES therapy delivered by the Myndmove stimulator in people with tetraplegia.

METHODS

A multi-center single-blind, parallel-group, two-arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing FES to conventional therapy in adults (≥18 years) with C4-C7 traumatic incomplete tetraplegia between 4 and 96 months post-injury, and with a baseline spinal cord injury independence measure III -self-care (SCIM III-SC) score of ≤10. Participants were enrolled at four SCI-specialized neurorehabilitation centers in the U.S. and Canada. Participants were stratified by center and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 40 sessions of FES or conventional therapy targeting upper extremities over a 14-week period. Blinded assessors measured SCIM III, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test, and Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension at baseline, after 20th session, after 40th session or 14 weeks after 1st session, and at 24 weeks after 1st session. The primary outcome measure was change in SCIM III-SC from baseline to end of the treatment. Based on the primary outcome measure, a sample size of 60 was calculated. Seventeen participants' progress in the study was interrupted due to the COVID-19 lockdown. The protocol was modified for these participants to allow them to complete the study.

RESULTS

Between June 2019 to August 2021, 51 participants were randomized to FES ( = 27) and conventional therapy ( = 24). Both groups gained a mean of 2 points in SCIM-SC scores at the end of treatment, which was a clinically meaningful change. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups on any outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Forty sessions of FES therapy delivered by the MyndMove stimulator are as effective as conventional therapy in producing meaningful functional improvements that persist after therapy is completed. Limitations of this study include the impact of COVID-19 limiting the ability to recruit the target sample size and per-protocol execution of the study in one-third of the participants.

REGISTRATION

This trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03439319.

摘要

背景

四肢瘫痪后上肢功能丧失会导致严重残疾。初步研究的新证据表明,功能性电刺激(FES)疗法可能会促进四肢瘫痪后上肢功能的恢复。本试验的目的是确定Myndmove刺激器提供的FES疗法对四肢瘫痪患者的有效性。

方法

进行了一项多中心单盲、平行组、双臂随机对照试验,将FES与传统疗法进行比较,研究对象为年龄≥18岁、C4 - C7创伤性不完全性四肢瘫痪且受伤后4至96个月、脊髓损伤独立测量III -自我护理(SCIM III - SC)基线评分≤10的成年人。参与者在美国和加拿大的四个脊髓损伤专科神经康复中心入组。参与者按中心分层,以1:1的比例随机接受为期14周的40次FES或针对上肢的传统疗法。盲法评估者在基线、第20次治疗后、第40次治疗后或第1次治疗后14周以及第1次治疗后24周测量SCIM III、多伦多康复研究所手功能测试以及力量、感觉和抓握能力的分级重新评估。主要结局指标是从基线到治疗结束时SCIM III - SC的变化。根据主要结局指标,计算出样本量为60。由于COVID - 19封锁,17名参与者的研究进展中断。针对这些参与者修改了方案,以便他们完成研究。

结果

在2019年6月至2021年8月期间,51名参与者被随机分配接受FES(n = 27)和传统疗法(n = 24)。两组在治疗结束时SCIM - SC评分平均提高了2分,这是一个具有临床意义的变化。然而,两组在任何结局指标上均无统计学显著差异。

结论

MyndMove刺激器提供的40次FES疗法在产生有意义的功能改善方面与传统疗法一样有效,且这些改善在治疗完成后持续存在。本研究的局限性包括COVID - 19的影响限制了招募目标样本量的能力,以及三分之一的参与者未按方案执行研究。

注册

本试验在www.ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT03439319。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/9500231/c978e5e67e9e/fresc-03-995244-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/9500231/bdbf774aff05/fresc-03-995244-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/9500231/c978e5e67e9e/fresc-03-995244-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/9500231/bdbf774aff05/fresc-03-995244-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/9500231/c978e5e67e9e/fresc-03-995244-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing functional electrical stimulation therapy to conventional therapy in incomplete tetraplegia.多中心、单盲随机对照试验:比较功能性电刺激疗法与传统疗法治疗不完全性四肢瘫的疗效
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Sep 9;3:995244. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.995244. eCollection 2022.
2
Multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial comparing MyndMove neuromodulation therapy with conventional therapy in traumatic spinal cord injury: a protocol study.多中心、单盲随机对照试验:比较MyndMove神经调节疗法与传统疗法治疗创伤性脊髓损伤的方案研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 28;10(9):e039650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039650.
3
Restoring voluntary grasping function in individuals with incomplete chronic spinal cord injury: pilot study.恢复慢性不完全性脊髓损伤患者的自主抓握功能:初步研究。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013 Fall;19(4):279-87. doi: 10.1310/sci1904-279.
4
Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in upper extremity rehabilitation after tetraplegia: protocol of a multicenter randomized, clinical trial.经颅直流电刺激在上肢瘫痪后康复中的安全性和有效性:一项多中心随机临床试验方案。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Sep;60(9):774-778. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00768-z. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
5
Functional electrical stimulation therapy for grasping in traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury: randomized control trial.功能性电刺激疗法治疗创伤性不完全性脊髓损伤的抓握功能:随机对照试验。
Artif Organs. 2011 Mar;35(3):212-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01216.x.
6
Clinically Significant Gains in Skillful Grasp Coordination by an Individual With Tetraplegia Using an Implanted Brain-Computer Interface With Forearm Transcutaneous Muscle Stimulation.经皮前臂肌电刺激的植入式脑-机接口可使四肢瘫痪个体的灵巧抓握协调性获得显著临床改善。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jul;100(7):1201-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.445. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
7
Influence of different rehabilitation therapy models on patient outcomes: hand function therapy in individuals with incomplete SCI.不同康复治疗模式对患者预后的影响:不完全性脊髓损伤患者的手功能治疗
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Nov;37(6):734-43. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000203. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
8
Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury ('Hands On'): a randomised trial.早期强化手部康复治疗并不优于亚急性脊髓损伤患者的常规护理加一对一手部治疗(“手在行动”):一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2017 Oct;63(4):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
10
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration for neurological improvement in patients with postrehabilitation chronic incomplete traumatic spinal cord injuries: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.粒细胞集落刺激因子对康复后慢性不完全性创伤性脊髓损伤患者神经功能改善的作用:一项双盲随机对照临床试验
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):97-107. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17769. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-target neural circuit reconstruction and enhancement in spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤中的多靶点神经回路重建与增强
Neural Regen Res. 2026 Mar 1;21(3):957-971. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00434. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Noninvasive Electromagnetic Neuromodulation of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System for Upper-Limb Motor Strength and Functionality in Individuals with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激治疗脑卒中和其他神经疾病的临床疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;24(14):4695. doi: 10.3390/s24144695.
3
Identifying Pertinent Digital Health Topics to Incorporate into Self-Care Pharmacy Education.

本文引用的文献

1
Multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial comparing MyndMove neuromodulation therapy with conventional therapy in traumatic spinal cord injury: a protocol study.多中心、单盲随机对照试验:比较MyndMove神经调节疗法与传统疗法治疗创伤性脊髓损伤的方案研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 28;10(9):e039650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039650.
2
Comparison of Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP).上肢测试能力(CUE-T)与力量、感觉和抓握分级重新定义评估(GRASSP)的反应性及最小临床重要差异比较
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Summer;24(3):227-238. doi: 10.1310/sci2403-227.
3
确定相关数字健康主题以纳入自我护理药学教育。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;12(3):96. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12030096.
4
Using "functional hand" protocol to improve hand function following a spinal cord injury: an explorative study.采用“功能性手”方案改善脊髓损伤后手功能:一项探索性研究。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Oct 17;94(5):e2023255. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i5.14408.
Effects of Activity-Based Therapy Interventions on Mobility, Independence, and Quality of Life for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
基于活动疗法干预对脊髓损伤患者活动能力、独立性和生活质量的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Neurotrauma. 2017 May 1;34(9):1726-1743. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4558. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Responsiveness, Sensitivity, and Minimally Detectable Difference of the Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension, Version 1.0.《力量、感觉及抓握能力分级与重新定义评估1.0版的反应性、敏感性及最小可检测差异》
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Feb 1;33(3):307-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4217. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Influence of different rehabilitation therapy models on patient outcomes: hand function therapy in individuals with incomplete SCI.不同康复治疗模式对患者预后的影响:不完全性脊髓损伤患者的手功能治疗
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Nov;37(6):734-43. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000203. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
6
Restoring voluntary grasping function in individuals with incomplete chronic spinal cord injury: pilot study.恢复慢性不完全性脊髓损伤患者的自主抓握功能:初步研究。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013 Fall;19(4):279-87. doi: 10.1310/sci1904-279.
7
Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury.多伦多康复研究所手部功能测试:脊髓损伤患者的粗大运动功能评估
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012 Spring;18(2):167-86. doi: 10.1310/sci1802-167.
8
The spinal cord independence measure: how much change is clinically significant for spinal cord injury subjects.脊髓独立性测量:脊髓损伤受试者的临床显著变化有多少。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Oct;35(21):1808-13. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.756942. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
9
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.分级再定义评估的力量感知觉和抓握:可靠性和有效性。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 20;29(5):905-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
10
Upper- and lower-extremity motor recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: an update from the national spinal cord injury database.创伤性颈脊髓损伤后上下肢运动功能的恢复:来自国家脊髓损伤数据库的最新更新。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Mar;92(3):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.027.