Scano Alessandro, Guanziroli Eleonora, Mira Robert M, Brambilla Cristina, Molinari Tosatti Lorenzo, Molteni Franco
Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing (STIIMA), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Milan-Lecco, Italy.
Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Costa Masnaga, Italy.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 28;3:943397. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.943397. eCollection 2022.
In hemiplegic patients with stroke, investigating the ipsilesional limb may shed light on the upper limb motor control, impairments and mechanisms of functional recovery. Usually investigation of motor impairment and rehabilitative interventions in patients are performed only based on the contralesional limb. Previous studies found that also the ipsilesional limb presents motor deficits, mostly evaluated with clinical scales which could lack of sensibility. To quantitatively evaluate the performance of the ipsilesional limb in patient with stroke, we conducted an observational study in which 49 hemiplegic patients were enrolled, divided in subgroups based on the severity of impairment of the contralesional limb, and assessed with a kinematic, dynamic and motor control evaluation protocol on their ipsilesional upper limb during reaching movements. Measurements were repeated in the acute and subacute phases and compared to healthy controls. Our results showed that the ipsilesional limb presented lower kinematic and dynamic performances with respect to the healthy controls. Patients performed the movements slower and with a reduced range of motion, indicating a difficulty in controlling the motion of the arm. The energy and the power outputs were lower in both shoulder and elbow joint with a high significance level, confirming the limitation found in kinematics. Moreover, we showed that motor deficits were higher in the acute phase with respect to the subacute one and we found higher significant differences in the group with a more severe contralesional limb impairment. Ipsilesional upper limb biomechanics adds significant and more sensible measures for assessments based on multi-joints dynamics, providing a better insight on the upper limb motor control after stroke. These results could have clinical implications while evaluating and treating ipsilesional and contralesional upper limb impairments and dysfunctions in patients with stroke.
在中风偏瘫患者中,研究患侧肢体可能有助于了解上肢运动控制、损伤及功能恢复机制。通常,对患者运动损伤的调查和康复干预仅基于对侧肢体进行。以往研究发现,患侧肢体也存在运动缺陷,大多通过可能缺乏敏感性的临床量表进行评估。为了定量评估中风患者患侧肢体的表现,我们开展了一项观察性研究,纳入了49例偏瘫患者,根据对侧肢体损伤的严重程度将其分为亚组,并在其患侧上肢进行伸手动作时,采用运动学、动力学和运动控制评估方案进行评估。在急性期和亚急性期重复测量,并与健康对照进行比较。我们的结果表明,与健康对照相比,患侧肢体的运动学和动力学表现较低。患者动作较慢,运动范围减小,表明控制手臂运动存在困难。肩部和肘关节的能量和功率输出均较低,具有高度显著性水平,证实了运动学方面的局限性。此外,我们还表明,急性期的运动缺陷比亚急性期更高,并且在对侧肢体损伤更严重的组中发现了更显著的差异。患侧上肢生物力学为基于多关节动力学的评估增加了重要且更敏感的指标,能更好地洞察中风后的上肢运动控制。这些结果在评估和治疗中风患者患侧和对侧上肢损伤及功能障碍时可能具有临床意义。