• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前磨牙-磨牙区的单冠修复:短(≤6.5)与较长种植体:回顾性队列研究。

Single-crown restorations in premolar-molar regions: short (≤ 6.5) vs longer implants: retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Clínica Eduardo Anitua, Jose Maria Cagigal Kalea, 19, 01007, Vitoria-Gazteiz, Álava, Spain.

BTI-Biotechnology Institute, Vitoria-Gazteiz, Álava, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Oct 4;8(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00438-y.

DOI:10.1186/s40729-022-00438-y
PMID:36192573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9530083/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the survival, changes in marginal bone level and prosthetic complications rate of short (≤ 6.5 mm) and longer implants (≥ 7.5) supporting a single-crown restoration in the maxillary/mandibular premolar or molar region.

METHODS

This cohort study was conducted following the STROBE statement recommendations for observational studies. Clinical outcomes of 88 short implants in 78 patients and 88 long implants in 88 patients were examined. All the implants had been placed by the same surgeon and restored following the same prosthetic concept; using a transepithelial abutment (intermediate abutment) and a screw retained restoration.

RESULTS

All the implants were in function after the follow-up period since insertion (median: 31 months; range 11 to 84 for SiG vs median: 35 months; range: 6-117 for CG; p = 0.139). No statistical differences (p = 0.342) were observed related to prosthetic complications (screw loosening 2/88 vs 5/88 CG, ceramic chipping 1/88 vs 0/88, temporary crown resin chipping 1/88 vs 0/88 for SiG and CG, respectively) or related to marginal bone level (Mesial or Distal MBL ≥ 2 mm in 1/88 implants for SiG vs 3/88 for CG; p = 0.312).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, no survival differences have been observed between short implants and longer implants in single-crown restorations in posterior maxilla/mandible.

摘要

目的

比较上颌/下颌前磨牙或磨牙区单个冠修复体中短(≤6.5mm)和长(≥7.5mm)种植体的存活率、边缘骨水平变化和修复体并发症发生率。

方法

本队列研究遵循 STROBE 声明对观察性研究的建议进行。共检查了 78 名患者 88 个短种植体和 88 名患者 88 个长种植体的临床结果。所有种植体均由同一位外科医生植入,并采用相同的修复体概念进行修复;使用上皮下基台(中间基台)和螺丝固位修复体。

结果

所有种植体在插入后的随访期间均能正常使用(中位时间:31 个月;范围 11 至 84 个月用于 SiG,中位时间:35 个月;范围 6 至 117 个月用于 CG;p=0.139)。未观察到与修复体并发症(螺丝松动 2/88 例 vs CG 组 5/88 例、陶瓷崩瓷 1/88 例 vs CG 组 0/88 例、临时冠树脂崩瓷 1/88 例 vs CG 组 0/88 例)或边缘骨水平(近远中边缘骨水平≥2mm 的种植体 1/88 例用于 SiG 组,3/88 例用于 CG 组;p=0.312)相关的统计学差异(p=0.342)。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,在后牙上颌/下颌区单个冠修复体中,短种植体和长种植体之间未观察到存活率差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/ab67f20afbd7/40729_2022_438_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/11037620b69d/40729_2022_438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/20a7971fca3e/40729_2022_438_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/1257239f3b35/40729_2022_438_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/ab67f20afbd7/40729_2022_438_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/11037620b69d/40729_2022_438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/20a7971fca3e/40729_2022_438_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/1257239f3b35/40729_2022_438_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc83/9530083/ab67f20afbd7/40729_2022_438_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-crown restorations in premolar-molar regions: short (≤ 6.5) vs longer implants: retrospective cohort study.前磨牙-磨牙区的单冠修复:短(≤6.5)与较长种植体:回顾性队列研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Oct 4;8(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00438-y.
2
Clinical Performance of Short Dental Implants Supporting Single Crown Restoration in the Molar-Premolar Region: Cement Versus Screw Retention.短种植体支持单冠修复在后牙区的临床效果:粘结固位与螺丝固位的对比。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):969–976. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7227. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
[Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].[后牙单颗种植体支持修复体5年随访疗效的临床观察]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 18;53(5):970-976. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.027.
4
Single-Unit Short Implants in the Molar Region: A Retrospective Study with a Minimum 3-Year Follow-up.单牙单位短种植体在磨牙区的应用:一项至少 3 年随访的回顾性研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):683-689. doi: 10.11607/prd.5005.
5
Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.后牙区多颗单牙种植修复:参照种植体-基台微间隙维持边缘骨水平
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):777-84.
6
Prosthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses supported by locking-taper implants: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.锁扣式种植体支持的固定义齿修复体的修复并发症:一项平均随访 5 年的回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 27;21(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01843-2.
7
Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.采用新型含纳米结构钙钛表面的5×5毫米种植体或在增量骨中使用更长种植体支持的假体修复后牙萎缩颌骨。一项随机对照试验的一年结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Winter;6(4):343-57.
8
Short vs. Standard Laser-Microgrooved Implants Supporting Single and Splinted Crowns: A Prospective Study with 3 Years Follow-Up.短款与标准款激光微螺纹种植体支持单冠和桥体修复:一项为期 3 年的前瞻性研究
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e771-e779. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12959. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
9
Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.采用带有纳米结构掺钙钛表面的5×5毫米种植体或增骨后使用更长种植体支持的假体修复后牙萎缩性颌骨。一项随机对照试验的3年结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):49-61.
10
4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.后牙区萎缩性颌骨增量骨中4毫米长种植体与更长种植体的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验的加载后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):31-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.与在同一修复体下固定的较长种植体相比,超短(≤5.5毫米)种植体的临床性能:一项随机临床试验。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 13;12(9):292. doi: 10.3390/dj12090292.

本文引用的文献

1
Success rate of short unitary implants installed in atrophic mandible: Integrative Review.短种植体在萎缩下颌骨中的植入成功率:综合评价。
Clin Ter. 2022 Apr 4;173(2):180-183. doi: 10.7417/CT.2022.2413.
2
Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors.短型与标准型后路植入物的回顾性研究及植入物失败风险因素分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Nov-Dec;36(6):1129-1136. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8930.
3
Influence of Dental Implant Diameter and Bone Quality on the Biomechanics of Single-Crown Restoration. A Finite Element Analysis.
牙种植体直径和骨质量对单冠修复生物力学的影响。有限元分析。
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Sep 6;9(9):103. doi: 10.3390/dj9090103.
4
Clinical outcomes of short implants (≤ 6 mm) placed between two adjacent teeth/implants or in the most distal position: A systematic review and meta-analysis.短种植体(≤6 毫米)在两颗相邻牙齿/种植体之间或最远端位置植入的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 Aug 20;14(3):241-257.
5
Failures in Single Extra-Short Implants (≤ 6 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单颗极短种植体(≤6 毫米)失败:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):669-689. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8689.
6
Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.短种植体(6 毫米)支持的单冠修复与上颌窦底提升联合使用标准长度种植体(13 毫米)的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 16;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00348-5.
7
The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.经牙槽嵴窦底提升联合短种植体的生存率:一项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 May 20;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00325-y.
8
Short implants (≤6mm) as an alternative treatment option to maxillary sinus lift.短种植体(≤6mm)作为上颌窦提升的替代治疗选择。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;50(11):1502-1510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
9
A 3D Finite Element Analysis of Bone Tissue in 3-Unit Implant-Supported Prostheses: Effect of Splinting Factor and Implant Length and Diameter.三单位种植体支持修复体中骨组织的三维有限元分析:桥接因素、种植体长度和直径的影响。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2021 Feb 28;29(2):76-83. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2098deSouzaBatista08.
10
Clinical Behavior of Short Dental Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.短种植体的临床行为:系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 12;9(10):3271. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103271.