• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于大规模社交网络节点分析的最大熵网络

Maximum entropy networks for large scale social network node analysis.

作者信息

De Clerck Bart, Rocha Luis E C, Van Utterbeeck Filip

机构信息

Department of Economics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Mathematics, Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Appl Netw Sci. 2022;7(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s41109-022-00506-7. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1007/s41109-022-00506-7
PMID:36193095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9517985/
Abstract

Recently proposed computational techniques allow the application of various maximum entropy network models at a larger scale. We focus on disinformation campaigns and apply different maximum entropy network models on the collection of datasets from the Twitter information operations report. For each dataset, we obtain additional Twitter data required to build an interaction network. We consider different interaction networks which we compare to an appropriate null model. The null model is used to identify statistically significant interactions. We validate our method and evaluate to what extent it is suited to identify communities of members of a disinformation campaign in a non-supervised way. We find that this method is suitable for larger social networks and allows to identify statistically significant interactions between users. Extracting the statistically significant interaction leads to the prevalence of users involved in a disinformation campaign being higher. We found that the use of different network models can provide different perceptions of the data and can lead to the identification of different meaningful patterns. We also test the robustness of the methods to illustrate the impact of missing data. Here we observe that sampling the correct data is of great importance to reconstruct an entire disinformation operation.

摘要

最近提出的计算技术允许在更大规模上应用各种最大熵网络模型。我们专注于虚假信息传播活动,并将不同的最大熵网络模型应用于从推特信息行动报告中收集的数据集。对于每个数据集,我们获取构建交互网络所需的额外推特数据。我们考虑不同的交互网络,并将其与适当的空模型进行比较。空模型用于识别具有统计显著性的交互。我们验证了我们的方法,并评估了它在多大程度上适合以无监督方式识别虚假信息传播活动成员的社区。我们发现这种方法适用于更大的社交网络,并能够识别用户之间具有统计显著性的交互。提取具有统计显著性的交互会导致参与虚假信息传播活动的用户比例更高。我们发现使用不同的网络模型可以提供对数据的不同认知,并能够识别不同的有意义模式。我们还测试了这些方法的稳健性,以说明缺失数据的影响。在此我们观察到,采样正确的数据对于重建整个虚假信息行动至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/bf5e184cce43/41109_2022_506_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/b52acbf76a1e/41109_2022_506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/96d028fb7b31/41109_2022_506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/3c50be530783/41109_2022_506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/515278ac78de/41109_2022_506_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/00708a92f170/41109_2022_506_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/4f77b034236d/41109_2022_506_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/30d1d312a407/41109_2022_506_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/bf5e184cce43/41109_2022_506_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/b52acbf76a1e/41109_2022_506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/96d028fb7b31/41109_2022_506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/3c50be530783/41109_2022_506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/515278ac78de/41109_2022_506_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/00708a92f170/41109_2022_506_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/4f77b034236d/41109_2022_506_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/30d1d312a407/41109_2022_506_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542f/9517985/bf5e184cce43/41109_2022_506_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Maximum entropy networks for large scale social network node analysis.用于大规模社交网络节点分析的最大熵网络
Appl Netw Sci. 2022;7(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s41109-022-00506-7. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
2
Automatic detection of influential actors in disinformation networks.自动检测虚假信息网络中的有影响力的行为者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011216118.
3
Revisited: A Product of Planned Disinformation Amplifying the COVID-19 "infodemic".重新审视:计划制造的假信息的产物,放大了 COVID-19“信息疫情”。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 14;9:649930. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.649930. eCollection 2021.
4
New Markov-Shannon Entropy models to assess connectivity quality in complex networks: from molecular to cellular pathway, Parasite-Host, Neural, Industry, and Legal-Social networks.新型马尔可夫-香农熵模型评估复杂网络的连接质量:从分子到细胞通路、寄生虫-宿主、神经、工业和法律-社会网络。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Jan 21;293:174-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
5
Mathematical modeling of disinformation and effectiveness of mitigation policies.虚假信息的数学建模及缓解政策的有效性
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):18735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45710-2.
6
Measuring nestedness: A comparative study of the performance of different metrics.测量嵌套性:不同指标性能的比较研究
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 22;10(21):11906-11921. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6663. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Protecting infrastructure performance from disinformation attacks.保护基础设施性能免受虚假信息攻击。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 26;12(1):12707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16832-w.
8
Social-Cyber Maneuvers During the COVID-19 Vaccine Initial Rollout: Content Analysis of Tweets.社交媒体在新冠疫苗接种初期的操作:推特内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 7;24(3):e34040. doi: 10.2196/34040.
9
Disinformed social movements: A large-scale mapping of conspiracy narratives as online harms during the COVID-19 pandemic.信息误导的社会运动:新冠疫情期间作为网络危害的阴谋论叙事大规模映射
Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Nov;26:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100174. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
Followback Clusters, Satellite Audiences, and Bridge Nodes: Coengagement Networks for the 2020 US Election.追溯集群、卫星受众和桥梁节点:2020年美国大选的共同参与网络
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2023;17:59-71. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22126. Epub 2023 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical node detection in temporal social networks, based on global and semi-local centrality measures.基于全局和半局部中心性度量的时间社交网络中的关键节点检测。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0327699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327699. eCollection 2025.
2
Entropy-based detection of Twitter echo chambers.基于熵的推特回音室检测
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Apr 25;3(5):pgae177. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae177. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Identification, analysis and prediction of valid and false information related to vaccines from Romanian tweets.

本文引用的文献

1
Brexit and bots: characterizing the behaviour of automated accounts on Twitter during the UK election.英国脱欧与机器人程序:剖析英国大选期间推特上自动账户的行为特征
EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):17. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00330-0. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
Detecting Misleading Information on COVID-19.检测关于新冠病毒的误导性信息。
IEEE Access. 2020 Sep 9;8:165201-165215. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022867. eCollection 2020.
3
Italian Twitter semantic network during the Covid-19 epidemic.新冠疫情期间的意大利推特语义网络。
从罗马尼亚语的推文中识别、分析和预测与疫苗相关的有效和虚假信息。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;12:1330801. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1330801. eCollection 2024.
EPJ Data Sci. 2021;10(1):47. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00301-x. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
4
Networked partisanship and framing: A socio-semantic network analysis of the Italian debate on migration.网络党派之争与框架:意大利移民问题辩论的社会语义网络分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0256705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256705. eCollection 2021.
5
Fast and scalable likelihood maximization for Exponential Random Graph Models with local constraints.具有局部约束的指数随机图模型的快速可扩展似然最大化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 27;11(1):15227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93830-4.
6
Flow of online misinformation during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.意大利新冠疫情高峰期的在线错误信息传播情况。
EPJ Data Sci. 2021;10(1):34. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00289-4. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Analysing Twitter semantic networks: the case of 2018 Italian elections.分析 Twitter 语义网络:以 2018 年意大利选举为例。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 24;11(1):13207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92337-2.
8
Automatic detection of influential actors in disinformation networks.自动检测虚假信息网络中的有影响力的行为者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011216118.
9
Exponential random graph model parameter estimation for very large directed networks.指数随机图模型参数估计在非常大的有向网络中的应用。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0227804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227804. eCollection 2020.
10
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.马修斯相关系数(MCC)在二分类评估中优于 F1 得分和准确率的优势。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.