Cohrdes Caroline, Wetzel Britta, Pryss Rüdiger, Baumeister Harald, Göbel Kristin
Mental Health Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute Berlin, PO Box 650261, D-13302 Berlin, Germany.
Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 30:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03628-4.
Early investigations of subjective well-being responses to the COVID-19 pandemic indicated average deterioration but also high variability related to vulnerability of population groups and pandemic phase. Thus, we aimed to gain new insights into the characteristics of certain groups and their differences in subjective well-being response patterns over time. First, we performed Latent Class Analyses with baseline survey data of 2,137 adults (mean age = 40.98, = 13.62) derived from the German CORONA HEALTH APP Study to identify subgroups showing similarity of a comprehensive set of 50 risk and protective factors. Next, we investigated the course of quality of life (QoL) as an indicator of subjective well-being grouped by the identified latent classes from July 2020 to July 2021 based on monthly and pandemic phase averaged follow-up survey data by means of Linear Mixed-Effects Regression Modeling. We identified 4 latent classes with distinct indicators and QoL trajectories (resilient, recovering, delayed, chronic) similar to previous evidence on responses to stressful life events. About 2 out of 5 people showed a resilient (i.e., relative stability) or recovering pattern (i.e., approaching pre-pandemic levels) over time. Absence of depressive symptoms, distress, needs or unhealthy behaviors and presence of adaptive coping, openness, good family climate and positive social experience were indicative of a resilient response pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic. The presented results add knowledge on how to adapt and enhance preparedness to future pandemic situations or similar societal crises by promoting adaptive coping, positive thinking and solidary strategies or timely low-threshold support offers.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-03628-4.
早期对新冠疫情主观幸福感反应的调查表明,幸福感平均下降,但也存在与人群脆弱性和疫情阶段相关的高变异性。因此,我们旨在深入了解特定群体的特征及其在主观幸福感反应模式上随时间的差异。首先,我们对来自德国新冠健康应用研究的2137名成年人(平均年龄 = 40.98,标准差 = 13.62)的基线调查数据进行了潜在类别分析,以识别在一组包含50个风险和保护因素的综合因素上表现出相似性的亚组。接下来,我们基于月度和疫情阶段平均随访调查数据,通过线性混合效应回归模型,调查了2020年7月至2021年7月按识别出的潜在类别分组的生活质量(QoL)进程,以此作为主观幸福感的指标。我们识别出了4个具有不同指标和QoL轨迹的潜在类别(有复原力的、正在恢复的、延迟的、慢性的),这与先前关于对压力性生活事件反应的证据相似。随着时间的推移,约五分之二的人表现出有复原力(即相对稳定)或正在恢复的模式(即接近疫情前水平)。在新冠疫情期间,没有抑郁症状、痛苦、需求或不健康行为,以及存在适应性应对、开放性、良好的家庭氛围和积极的社交体验,表明是一种有复原力的反应模式。所呈现的结果增加了关于如何通过促进适应性应对、积极思考和团结策略或及时提供低门槛支持来适应和加强对未来疫情形势或类似社会危机的准备的知识。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s12144-022-03628-4获取的补充材料。