Karenberg Axel, Martin Michael, Fangerau Heiner
Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Köln, Universität zu Köln, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 20, 50931, Köln, Deutschland.
Institut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Nervenarzt. 2022 Oct;93(Suppl 1):138-159. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01328-9. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
Some 90 years after the beginning of the Nazi regime, the German Neurological Society (DGN) commissioned an investigation into the extent to which persecution, expulsion and extermination during the "Third Reich" also affected neurologists. In total, the biographies of 61 mostly Jewish physicians and scientists, of whom more than 70% were members of the neurological association of the time, could be analyzed. Most of them emigrated, a few remained in Germany or Austria despite persecution, and nine died in the Holocaust or by suicide. The racistically motivated expulsion affected all age groups, especially those who were 30-60 years old in "middle" positions. In close connection with Nazi legislation, three waves of emigration can be distinguished (1933-1934, 1935-1937, 1938-1939) and the clearly preferred destination country was the USA (64.7%). Younger age, knowledge of a universal language, reliable family and academic connections as well as internationally recognized publications, could make it easier to start a career in the country of exile. It was not uncommon for those who were involved in neurological fields before emigration to turn to basic science or psychiatry afterwards. The general "brain-drain"/"brain gain" hypothesis must be expanded by analyses on the biographical microlevel in order to illustrate the difficulties emigrants encountered when trying to start a new career and to publicize a sometimes unsuccessful acculturation. Not a single neurologist returned to Germany and, as far as can be assessed, any compensation, if at all was low. The critical assessment of the racistically motivated persecution between 1933 and 1945 can today be an occasion for the DGN and its members to reflect on collegiality as a value as well as to become more aware of structurally related discrimination and injustice and to counteract it in a timely manner.
在纳粹政权开始约90年后,德国神经病学学会(DGN)委托进行了一项调查,以探究“第三帝国”期间的迫害、驱逐和灭绝行为对神经科医生的影响程度。总共对61位主要为犹太裔的医生和科学家的生平进行了分析,其中70%以上是当时神经学协会的成员。他们中的大多数人移民了,少数人尽管受到迫害仍留在德国或奥地利,还有9人死于大屠杀或自杀。出于种族动机的驱逐影响了所有年龄组,尤其是那些处于“中年”、年龄在30至60岁之间的人。与纳粹立法密切相关,可以区分出三波移民潮(1933 - 1934年、1935 - 1937年、1938 - 1939年),而明显最受欢迎的目的地国家是美国(64.7%)。较年轻的年龄、掌握一门通用语言、可靠的家庭和学术关系以及国际认可的出版物,可能会使在流亡国家更容易开启职业生涯。移民前从事神经学领域工作的人后来转向基础科学或精神病学的情况并不少见。必须通过对个人生平微观层面的分析来扩展一般的“人才流失”/“人才流入”假说,以说明移民在试图开启新职业生涯时遇到的困难,并宣传有时并不成功的文化适应情况。没有一位神经科医生回到德国,并且据评估,任何补偿(如果有的话)都很低。对1933年至1945年间出于种族动机的迫害进行批判性评估,如今可以成为DGN及其成员反思团结作为一种价值观的契机,同时更加意识到与结构相关的歧视和不公正,并及时加以抵制。