Messinger John C, Kesselheim Aaron S, Vine Seanna M, Fischer Michael A, Barenie Rachel E
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Boston, MA, USA.
Subst Abuse. 2022 Sep 29;16:11782218221126972. doi: 10.1177/11782218221126972. eCollection 2022.
To describe naloxone dispensing in Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) and examine relationships between copays and coverage limits for naloxone and its dispensing rates.
Cross-sectional study using Medicaid FFS State Drug Utilization Data to quantify the use of naloxone in 2018. The primary outcomes of this study were the proportion of naloxone prescriptions relative to all prescriptions and all opioid prescriptions dispensed in each state. We obtained drug benefit design information from the Medicaid Behavioral Health Services Database. The primary analysis examined the influence of copays (yes/no), copay amounts, and coverage limits on medication dispensing using simple linear regression, excluding states with no measurable use or less than 5% Medicaid FFS.
We found substantial variability across 50 states and DC in the proportion of prescriptions dispensed for Narcan and generic naloxone. We found a positive relationship between copay and copay amount and dispensing of generic naloxone. However, a sensitivity analysis including the broadest possible cohort of states failed to confirm this relationship. We found no other relationships between copays or coverage limits and dispensing of any naloxone formulation.
Substantial variation exists between the rates of naloxone dispensing across the US for Medicaid patients, but we did not find a meaningful relationship between plan design and dispensing. Whether drug benefit designs in Medicaid influence naloxone use requires further evaluation to avoid limiting access to this life-saving medication.
描述医疗补助按服务付费(FFS)模式下纳洛酮的配药情况,并研究纳洛酮的自付费用和保险覆盖限额与其配药率之间的关系。
采用横断面研究,利用医疗补助FFS模式下的州药物利用数据来量化2018年纳洛酮的使用情况。本研究的主要结果是每个州纳洛酮处方相对于所有处方和所有阿片类药物处方的比例。我们从医疗补助行为健康服务数据库中获取了药物福利设计信息。主要分析使用简单线性回归研究了自付费用(是/否)、自付费用金额和保险覆盖限额对药物配药的影响,排除了没有可测量使用情况或医疗补助FFS模式使用率低于5%的州。
我们发现,在50个州和华盛顿特区,纳洛酮和通用型纳洛酮的处方配药比例存在很大差异。我们发现自付费用和自付费用金额与通用型纳洛酮的配药之间存在正相关关系。然而,一项纳入尽可能多州的敏感性分析未能证实这种关系。我们未发现自付费用或保险覆盖限额与任何纳洛酮制剂的配药之间存在其他关系。
美国医疗补助患者的纳洛酮配药率存在很大差异,但我们未发现保险计划设计与配药之间存在有意义的关系。医疗补助中的药物福利设计是否会影响纳洛酮的使用需要进一步评估,以避免限制人们获得这种救命药物的机会。