• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市医保定点医院的医疗服务可及性限制了肺癌筛查的资格。

Access to Care Limits Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility in an Urban Safety Net Hospital.

机构信息

Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.

The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221128701. doi: 10.1177/21501319221128701.

DOI:10.1177/21501319221128701
PMID:36200665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9549100/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lung cancer screening (LCS) results in earlier detection of malignancy and decreases mortality but requires access to care to benefit. We assessed factors associated with timing of lung cancer diagnosis in the absence of systematic LCS in an urban safety net hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed of patients with pathologic diagnosis and/or staging of lung cancer at our institution between 2015 and 2018. Patient socio-demographics, disease characteristics, factors associated with access to medical care, and time point and process by which the patient accessed care were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 223 patients were identified with median age of 63 years and 57.8% male predominance. Racial distribution was 22.9%, 20.2%, 17.1%, and 9.4% for Black, White, Asian, and Hispanic, respectively. Stage at diagnosis was 8.1%, 4.5%, 17.0%, and 60.5% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Medicaid (59.6%) and Medicare/Medicaid (17.1%) were the most common insurance types, while 16.1% had no insurance. A majority (54.3%) had no established primary care provider (PCP), and only 17.9% had an in-network PCP. Patients without PCPs were more likely to have diagnostic evaluation initiated from Emergency Department or Urgent Care settings (95.0% vs 50.1%,  < .01) and present with later stage disease (92.7% vs 77.8%,  < .01). Of the 83 patients that met age and smoking history LCS criteria, only 33.7% (12.6% of total) also had an in-network PCP.

CONCLUSION

Absence of established PCPs is associated with later stage presentation of lung cancer and may limit system- level benefits of LCS implementation.

摘要

目的

肺癌筛查(LCS)可更早地发现恶性肿瘤并降低死亡率,但需要获得医疗服务才能从中受益。我们评估了在没有系统的 LCS 的情况下,在城市医疗保障医院中与肺癌诊断时间相关的因素。

患者和方法

对 2015 年至 2018 年在我院进行病理诊断和/或肺癌分期的患者进行了回顾性图表审查。收集并分析了患者的社会人口统计学特征、疾病特征、获得医疗服务的相关因素以及患者获得医疗服务的时间点和流程。

结果

共确定了 223 名患者,中位年龄为 63 岁,男性占 57.8%。种族分布分别为黑人 22.9%、白人 20.2%、亚洲人 17.1%和西班牙裔 9.4%。诊断时的分期分别为 I 期 8.1%、II 期 4.5%、III 期 17.0%和 IV 期 60.5%。最常见的保险类型是医疗补助(Medicaid,59.6%)和医疗保险/医疗补助(Medicare/Medicaid,17.1%),而 16.1%的患者没有保险。大多数(54.3%)没有固定的初级保健提供者(PCP),只有 17.9%的患者有联网的 PCP。没有 PCP 的患者更有可能从急诊或紧急护理机构开始进行诊断评估(95.0%比 50.1%,<.01),并且疾病分期更晚(92.7%比 77.8%,<.01)。在符合年龄和吸烟史 LCS 标准的 83 名患者中,只有 33.7%(占总数的 12.6%)也有联网的 PCP。

结论

没有固定的 PCP 与肺癌的晚期表现相关,可能限制了 LCS 实施的系统效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d655/9549100/a266ce16a634/10.1177_21501319221128701-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d655/9549100/a266ce16a634/10.1177_21501319221128701-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d655/9549100/a266ce16a634/10.1177_21501319221128701-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Access to Care Limits Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility in an Urban Safety Net Hospital.城市医保定点医院的医疗服务可及性限制了肺癌筛查的资格。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221128701. doi: 10.1177/21501319221128701.
2
Black Race Remains Associated with Lower Eligibility for Screening Using 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Among Lung Cancer Patients at an Urban Safety Net Hospital.在美国城市医疗系统中,对于肺癌患者,黑人种族仍然与 2021 年美国预防服务工作组的推荐使用筛查的低资格率相关。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Dec;10(6):2836-2843. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01460-x. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
Screening Patterns and Mortality Differences in Patients With Lung Cancer at an Urban Underserved Community.城市服务不足社区肺癌患者的筛查模式和死亡率差异。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):e767-e773. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.解决肺癌筛查资格和医疗保健获取方面的差异。美国胸科学会官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):e95-e112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3053ST.
5
Impact of a Hybrid Lung Cancer Screening Model on Patient Outcomes and Provider Behavior.混合肺癌筛查模式对患者结局和提供者行为的影响。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Nov;21(6):e640-e646. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 23.
6
Using Community Health Advisors to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness in the Black Belt: a Pilot Study.利用社区健康顾问提高黑带地区肺癌筛查意识:一项试点研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1286-1295. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02261-w. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
7
Access to Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration: Does Geographic Distribution Match Need in the Population?退伍军人事务部的肺癌筛查机会:地理分布是否符合人群需求?
Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Augmented meaningful use criteria to identify patients eligible for lung cancer screening.增加有意义的使用标准,以确定有资格进行肺癌筛查的患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.105. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis.12种癌症确诊时保险状况及种族与癌症分期的关联:一项回顾性分析
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):222-31. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70032-9. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
10
New recommendation and coverage of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening: uptake has increased but is still low.肺癌筛查低剂量计算机断层扫描的新推荐与覆盖情况:接受度有所提高但仍较低。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3338-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying lung cancer in Emergency Department patients outside national lung cancer screening guidelines.在不符合国家肺癌筛查指南的急诊科患者中识别肺癌。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):695-706. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1399. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Lung cancer in the emergency department.急诊科中的肺癌
Emerg Cancer Care. 2023;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44201-023-00018-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Likelihood of Lung Cancer Screening by Poor Health Status and Race and Ethnicity in US Adults, 2017 to 2020.美国成年人 2017 至 2020 年按健康状况和种族/族裔评估肺癌筛查的可能性
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e225318. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5318.
2
Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer.错失机会?一项观察性分析肺癌筛查在肺癌患者中的应用。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221077959. doi: 10.1177/10732748221077959.
3
Disparities in Tumor Mutational Burden, Immunotherapy Use, and Outcomes Based on Genomic Ancestry in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
基于基因组起源的非小细胞肺癌肿瘤突变负担、免疫治疗应用和结局的差异。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Sep;7:1537-1546. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00309.
4
The Impact of Medicare Health Insurance Coverage on Lung Cancer Screening.医疗保险对肺癌筛查的影响。
Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001655.
5
Examination of the Association Between Access to Care and Lung Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Smokers.高危烟民获得医疗服务的机会与肺癌筛查之间的关联研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;9:684558. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.684558. eCollection 2021.
6
Distribution and Geographic Accessibility of Lung Cancer Screening Centers in the United States.美国肺癌筛查中心的分布与地理可达性
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Sep;18(9):1577-1580. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202010-1313RL.
7
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
8
Adherence to annual lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scan in a diverse population.在不同人群中进行年度肺癌低剂量 CT 筛查的依从性。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Mar;32(3):291-298. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01383-0. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
9
Lung cancer screening eligibility and use with low-dose computed tomography: Results from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System cross-sectional survey.肺癌筛查资格和低剂量计算机断层扫描的使用:来自 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统横断面调查的结果。
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):748-756. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33322. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.美国肺癌筛查中低剂量计算机断层扫描的州际差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Aug 2;113(8):1044-1052. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa170.