• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 期间,通过视频会议与居民和家属进行护理计划:加拿大长期护理的经验。

Video Conferencing With Residents and Families for Care Planning During COVID-19: Experiences in Canadian Long-Term Care.

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):478-489. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac154.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnac154
PMID:36201219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9619647/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Government-mandated health and safety restrictions to mitigate the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) intensified challenges in caring for older adults in long-term care (LTC) without family/care partners. This article describes the experiences of a multidisciplinary research team in implementing an evidence-based intervention for family-centered, team-based, virtual care planning-PIECESTM approach-into clinical practice. We highlight challenges and considerations for implementation science to support care practices for older adults in LTC, their families, and the workforce.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was used. Data included meetings with LTC directors and Registered Practical Nurses (i.e., licensed nurse who graduated with a 2-year diploma program that allows them to provide basic nursing care); one-on-one interviews with family/care partners, residents, Registered Practical Nurses, and PIECES mentors; and reflections of the academic team. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research provided sensitizing constructs for deductive coding, while an inductive approach also allowed themes to emerge.

RESULTS

Findings highlighted how aspects related to planning, engagement, execution, reflection, and evaluation influenced the implementation process from the perspectives of stakeholders. Involving expert partners on the research team to bridge research and practice, developing relationships from a distance, empowering frontline champions, and adapting to challenging circumstances led to shared commitments for intervention success.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Lessons learned include the significance of stakeholder involvement throughout all research activities, the importance of clarity around expectations of all team members, and the consequence of readiness for implementation with respect to circumstances (e.g., COVID-19) and capacity for change.

摘要

背景与目的

为减轻 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的影响,政府强制实施了健康和安全限制,这给没有家属/护理伙伴的长期护理(LTC)中的老年人护理带来了更大的挑战。本文描述了一个多学科研究团队在将基于证据的以家庭为中心、团队为基础、虚拟护理计划-PIECESTM 方法实施到临床实践中的经验。我们强调了实施科学的挑战和注意事项,以支持 LTC 中的老年人、他们的家属和劳动力的护理实践。

研究设计与方法

采用定性描述性设计。数据包括与 LTC 主任和注册护士(即,从为期 2 年的大专课程毕业的持照护士,他们可以提供基本的护理服务)的会议;与家属/护理伙伴、居民、注册护士和 PIECES 导师的一对一访谈;以及学术团队的反思。实施研究综合框架为演绎编码提供了敏感结构,而归纳方法也允许主题出现。

结果

研究结果强调了规划、参与、执行、反思和评估等方面如何从利益相关者的角度影响实施过程。在研究团队中引入专家合作伙伴以弥合研究与实践之间的差距,建立远程关系,赋予一线冠军权力,并适应具有挑战性的环境,这些都促成了对干预成功的共同承诺。

讨论与意义

经验教训包括在所有研究活动中利益相关者参与的重要性,所有团队成员期望明确的重要性,以及在考虑到情况(例如 COVID-19)和变革能力的情况下实施的准备情况的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a233/10028234/a7a700380a35/gnac154f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a233/10028234/a7a700380a35/gnac154f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a233/10028234/a7a700380a35/gnac154f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Video Conferencing With Residents and Families for Care Planning During COVID-19: Experiences in Canadian Long-Term Care.在 COVID-19 期间,通过视频会议与居民和家属进行护理计划:加拿大长期护理的经验。
Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):478-489. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac154.
2
Nurse-Led Virtual Delivery of PIECES in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes to Support the Care of Older Adults Experiencing Responsive Behaviors During COVID-19: Qualitative Descriptive Study.在加拿大长期护理院中由护士主导的PIECES虚拟服务,以支持在COVID-19期间对出现反应性行为的老年人的护理:定性描述性研究
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Dec 13;5(1):e42731. doi: 10.2196/42731.
3
Using telepresence robots as a tool to engage patient and family partners in dementia research during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative participatory study.在新冠疫情期间,使用远程临场机器人作为工具让患者及家属参与痴呆症研究:一项定性参与式研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 23;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00421-w.
4
Quality improvement collaborative approach to COVID-19 pandemic preparedness in long-term care homes: a mixed-methods implementation study.长期护理院 COVID-19 大流行准备的质量改进协作方法:一项混合方法实施研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 8;13(2):e002589. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002589.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Resilience amongst Ontario registered practical nurses in long-term care homes during COVID-19: A grounded theory study.安大略省长期护理院注册实习护士在 COVID-19 期间的韧性:扎根理论研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Dec;78(12):4221-4235. doi: 10.1111/jan.15453. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
7
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Foster the Adoption of a New Dementia Education Game During the COVID-19 Pandemic.利用整合实施研究框架在 COVID-19 大流行期间推广新的痴呆症教育游戏。
Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):467-477. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac138.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Exploring research team members' and trial participants' perceptions of acceptability and implementation within one videoconference-based supportive care program for individuals affected by systemic sclerosis during COVID-19: a qualitative interview study.在 COVID-19 期间,通过基于视频会议的支持性护理计划,探索研究团队成员和试验参与者对受系统性硬化症影响个体的可接受性和实施的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):442-452. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac091.
10
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Goals of Care Consultation for Advanced Frailty: a Qualitative Implementation Study Providing Insights from the Pandemic.晚期衰弱的虚拟照护咨询目标:一项提供大流行见解的定性实施研究
Can Geriatr J. 2025 Mar 1;28(1):1-15. doi: 10.5770/cgj.28.759. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Pragmatic Trials in Long-Term Care: Implementation and Dissemination Challenges and Opportunities.长期护理中的实用临床试验:实施和传播的挑战与机遇。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Mar;23(3):339-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.024. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
2
Implementation of evidence-based guidance for dementia palliative care using participatory action research: examining implementation through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).采用参与式行动研究实施痴呆症姑息治疗的循证指南:通过实施研究综合框架(CFIR)审视实施情况。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Dec 11;2(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00241-7.
3
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
实施长期护理循证指南的障碍和促进因素:定性证据综合。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 9;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01140-0.
4
Editorial: Nursing Homes and Long Term Care after COVID-19: A New Era?社论:新冠疫情后的养老院与长期护理:一个新时代?
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(10):1042-1046. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1447-8.
5
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Long-Term Care Facilities Worldwide: An Overview on International Issues.COVID-19 大流行对全球长期护理机构的影响:国际问题概述。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 4;2020:8870249. doi: 10.1155/2020/8870249. eCollection 2020.
6
Uncovering the Devaluation of Nursing Home Staff During COVID-19: Are We Fuelling the Next Health Care Crisis?揭示新冠疫情期间养老院工作人员价值被低估的现象:我们是否正在引发下一场医疗危机?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):962-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Citizen and stakeholder led priority setting for long-term care research: identifying research priorities within the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program.由公民和利益相关者主导的长期护理研究优先级设定:在老年护理转化研究(TREC)项目中确定研究优先级
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 15;6:24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00199-1. eCollection 2020.
8
Unpacking organizational readiness for change: an updated systematic review and content analysis of assessments.解析组织变革准备度:评估的最新系统回顾和内容分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4926-z.
9
Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes' Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process.确定优先事项,以告知养老院参与医疗保健创新准备情况的评估:系统映射审查和共识过程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030987.
10
Systematic review on barriers and facilitators of complex interventions for residents with dementia in long-term care.对长期护理中痴呆居民复杂干预措施的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 Sep;33(9):873-889. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000034. Epub 2020 Feb 7.