• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估两种半监督学习方法及其组合在骨髓细胞自动分类中的应用。

Evaluation of two semi-supervised learning methods and their combination for automatic classification of bone marrow cells.

机构信息

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20651-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-20651-4
PMID:36202847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9537320/
Abstract

Differential bone marrow (BM) cell counting is an important test for the diagnosis of various hematological diseases. However, it is difficult to accurately classify BM cells due to non-uniformity and the lack of reproducibility of differential counting. Therefore, automatic classification systems have been developed in which deep learning is used. These systems requires large and accurately labeled datasets for training. To overcome this, we used semi-supervised learning (SSL), in which learning proceeds while labeling. We used three methods: self-training (ST), active learning (AL), and a combination of these methods, and attempted to automatically classify 16 types of BM cell images. ST involves data verification, as in AL, before adding them to the training dataset (confirmed self-training: CST). After 25 rounds of CST, AL, and CST + AL, the initial number of training data increased from 425 to 40,518; 3682; and 47,843, respectively. Accuracies for the test data of 50 images for each cell type were 0.944, 0.941, and 0.976, respectively. Data added with CST or AL showed some imbalances between classes, while CST + AL exhibited fewer imbalances. We suggest that CST + AL, when combined with two SSL methods, is efficient in increasing training data for the development of automatic BM cells classification systems.

摘要

骨髓(BM)细胞差异计数是诊断各种血液疾病的重要检验。然而,由于差异计数的不均匀性和可重复性差,因此难以准确分类 BM 细胞。因此,已经开发了使用深度学习的自动分类系统。这些系统需要大量准确标记的数据集进行训练。为了克服这一问题,我们使用了半监督学习(SSL),在学习的同时进行标记。我们使用了三种方法:自训练(ST)、主动学习(AL)以及这些方法的组合,并尝试自动分类 16 种 BM 细胞图像。ST 涉及数据验证,就像在 AL 中一样,然后再将其添加到训练数据集(确认自训练:CST)中。在 25 轮 CST、AL 和 CST+AL 之后,初始训练数据量分别从 425 增加到 40,518、3682 和 47,843。对于每种细胞类型的 50 个图像的测试数据,准确性分别为 0.944、0.941 和 0.976。使用 CST 或 AL 添加的数据在某些类别之间存在不平衡,而 CST+AL 则表现出较少的不平衡。我们建议,当与两种 SSL 方法结合使用时,CST+AL 可以有效地增加训练数据,从而开发自动 BM 细胞分类系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/12766e0e7510/41598_2022_20651_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/0e728ffa2bfc/41598_2022_20651_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/1f740b454c88/41598_2022_20651_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/1f0b887a7bf1/41598_2022_20651_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/9daea1a188cd/41598_2022_20651_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/217129cf466f/41598_2022_20651_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/7feb1697884d/41598_2022_20651_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/ad6c297d2ca3/41598_2022_20651_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/e24bbc2a0130/41598_2022_20651_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/2d89a6ca8e28/41598_2022_20651_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/0c0be34a6e48/41598_2022_20651_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/12766e0e7510/41598_2022_20651_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/0e728ffa2bfc/41598_2022_20651_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/1f740b454c88/41598_2022_20651_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/1f0b887a7bf1/41598_2022_20651_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/9daea1a188cd/41598_2022_20651_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/217129cf466f/41598_2022_20651_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/7feb1697884d/41598_2022_20651_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/ad6c297d2ca3/41598_2022_20651_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/e24bbc2a0130/41598_2022_20651_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/2d89a6ca8e28/41598_2022_20651_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/0c0be34a6e48/41598_2022_20651_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a7b/9537320/12766e0e7510/41598_2022_20651_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of two semi-supervised learning methods and their combination for automatic classification of bone marrow cells.评估两种半监督学习方法及其组合在骨髓细胞自动分类中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20651-4.
2
Semi-supervised Long-tail Endoscopic Image Classification.半监督长尾内窥镜图像分类。
Chin Med Sci J. 2022 Sep 30;37(3):171-180. doi: 10.24920/004135.
3
Evaluation of deep learning training strategies for the classification of bone marrow cell images.深度学习训练策略在骨髓细胞图像分类中的评估。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Jan;243:107924. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107924. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Comprehensive study of semi-supervised learning for DNA methylation-based supervised classification of central nervous system tumors.基于 DNA 甲基化的中枢神经系统肿瘤有监督分类的半监督学习综合研究。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Jun 8;23(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04764-1.
5
A real use case of semi-supervised learning for mammogram classification in a local clinic of Costa Rica.半监督学习在哥斯达黎加当地诊所的乳房 X 光分类中的实际应用案例。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Apr;60(4):1159-1175. doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02497-6. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Magnetic Tile Surface Defect Detection Methodology Based on Self-Attention and Self-Supervised Learning.基于自注意力和自监督学习的磁瓦表面缺陷检测方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 3;2022:3003810. doi: 10.1155/2022/3003810. eCollection 2022.
7
Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification.基于异构数据和少量局部标注的深度卷积神经网络的半监督学习:前列腺组织病理学图像分类实验。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102165. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102165. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
Semi-supervised classification of radiology images with NoTeacher: A teacher that is not mean.无师自通的放射影像半监督分类:一个不吝啬的老师。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102148. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102148. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
9
Deep virtual adversarial self-training with consistency regularization for semi-supervised medical image classification.深度对偶对抗自训练与一致性正则化在半监督医学图像分类中的应用。
Med Image Anal. 2021 May;70:102010. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102010. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
10
Unsupervised and semi-supervised learning: the next frontier in machine learning for plant systems biology.无监督和半监督学习:植物系统生物学机器学习的下一个前沿。
Plant J. 2022 Sep;111(6):1527-1538. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15905. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Models for the marrow: A comprehensive review of AI-based cell classification methods and malignancy detection in bone marrow aspirate smears.骨髓模型:基于人工智能的骨髓涂片细胞分类方法与恶性肿瘤检测的全面综述
Hemasphere. 2024 Dec 3;8(12):e70048. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70048. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Recent advancements in machine learning for bone marrow cell morphology analysis.用于骨髓细胞形态分析的机器学习的最新进展。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 14;11:1402768. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1402768. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Highly accurate differentiation of bone marrow cell morphologies using deep neural networks on a large image data set.利用深度神经网络对大型图像数据集进行高精度的骨髓细胞形态学区分。
Blood. 2021 Nov 18;138(20):1917-1927. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020010568.
2
A deep learning method for counting white blood cells in bone marrow images.一种用于骨髓图像中白细胞计数的深度学习方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2021 Nov 8;22(Suppl 5):94. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04003-z.
3
Deep Learning-Based Nuclear Lobe Count Method for Differential Count of Neutrophils.
基于深度学习的核叶计数方法用于中性粒细胞的差异计数。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2021 Jul;254(3):199-206. doi: 10.1620/tjem.254.199.
4
Reevaluation of reference values for bone marrow differential counts in 236 healthy bone marrow donors.236 例健康骨髓供者骨髓细胞分类计数参考值的再评估。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Dec;99(12):2723-2729. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04255-4. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Morphogo: An Automatic Bone Marrow Cell Classification System on Digital Images Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence.Morphogo:一种基于人工智能分析数字图像的自动骨髓细胞分类系统。
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(6):588-596. doi: 10.1159/000509524. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
6
A Hematologist-Level Deep Learning Algorithm (BMSNet) for Assessing the Morphologies of Single Nuclear Balls in Bone Marrow Smears: Algorithm Development.一种用于评估骨髓涂片单核球形态的血液科医生水平深度学习算法(BMSNet):算法开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Apr 8;8(4):e15963. doi: 10.2196/15963.
7
Recognition of peripheral blood cell images using convolutional neural networks.使用卷积神经网络识别外周血细胞图像。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Oct;180:105020. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105020. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
8
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks.挤压激励网络。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020 Aug;42(8):2011-2023. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2913372. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Fine-grained leukocyte classification with deep residual learning for microscopic images.基于深度残差学习的微观图像细粒度白细胞分类。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Aug;162:243-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 22.
10
Is a 500-Cell Count Necessary for Bone Marrow Differentials?: A Proposed Analytical Method for Validating a Lower Cutoff.500 个细胞计数对于骨髓细胞分类是否必要?:验证更低截断值的一种分析方法。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 May 31;150(1):84-91. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy034.