• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症患者的听觉脑电描记术:一项随机对照试验性研究。

Acoustocerebrography in septic patients: A randomized and controlled pilot study.

作者信息

Sauer Martin, Sievert Anika, Wrobel Miroslaw, Schmude Paul, Richter Georg

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Fraunhofer Institute Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Front Med Technol. 2022 Sep 14;4:920674. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.920674. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2022.920674
PMID:36203789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9531262/
Abstract

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a common organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and leads to higher mortality and longer hospital stay. The diagnosis remains an exclusion process; none of the available measurements are specific for SAE. The aim of the presented prospective and controlled clinical study was to evaluate the possible role of molecular acoustics in determining acute brain injury in septic patients using an acoustocerebrography (ACG) system. ACG is a multifrequency, transcranial ultrasound method that measures the attenuation and time of flight to detect changes in the brain tissue. After approval from the local research ethics committee (of the University Hospital of Rostock: Reg. No.: A 2016-0026), 20 patients were included in two study groups: septic shock group (SG) and control group (CG; postoperative nonseptic patients). All patients were screened several times with the ACG on different days. Blood parameters of organ function, sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, and delirium scores [Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)] were obtained as well. A neurologist examined all patients at inclusion. Predictive analysis was done using a data-driven statistical method and by deriving a parameter from the ACG data. The study was registered under "clinicaltrials.gov" (Reg. No.: NCT03173196). All patients in the SG were CAM-ICU-positive at inclusion (ICDSC: in mean 4.0) and had clinical signs of SAE. In contrast, all patients in the CG were CAM-ICU-negative, with an ICDSC score of 0. Predictive analysis using the ACG data presented an accuracy of 83.4% with a specificity of 89.0% and a sensitivity of 75.1%. The ACG method may be helpful for the monitoring and diagnosing acute brain injury; however, the results of this first report should be verified by further clinical studies. Further investigations should include long-established instruments of SAE diagnosis, e.g., electroencephalography, MRI, and biomarkers, to compare the results with the ACG measurements.

摘要

脓毒症相关性脑病(SAE)是严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者常见的器官功能障碍,会导致更高的死亡率和更长的住院时间。其诊断仍然是一个排除过程;现有的检测方法均对SAE缺乏特异性。本前瞻性对照临床研究的目的是使用脑声图(ACG)系统评估分子声学在确定脓毒症患者急性脑损伤中的可能作用。ACG是一种多频经颅超声方法,通过测量衰减和飞行时间来检测脑组织的变化。经当地研究伦理委员会(罗斯托克大学医院:注册号:A 2016 - 0026)批准后,20名患者被纳入两个研究组:脓毒性休克组(SG)和对照组(CG;术后非脓毒症患者)。所有患者在不同日期多次接受ACG检查。还获取了器官功能的血液参数、脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估评分以及谵妄评分[重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法(CAM - ICU)和重症监护谵妄筛查清单(ICDSC)]。一名神经科医生在入组时对所有患者进行了检查。使用数据驱动的统计方法并从ACG数据中推导参数进行预测分析。该研究已在“clinicaltrials.gov”注册(注册号:NCT03173196)。SG组所有患者入组时CAM - ICU呈阳性(ICDSC:平均为4.0),并有SAE的临床体征。相比之下,CG组所有患者CAM - ICU呈阴性,ICDSC评分为0。使用ACG数据进行的预测分析准确率为83.4%,特异性为89.0%,敏感性为75.1%。ACG方法可能有助于监测和诊断急性脑损伤;然而,这一初步报告的结果应通过进一步的临床研究加以验证。进一步的研究应纳入SAE诊断的成熟手段,如脑电图、MRI和生物标志物,以便将结果与ACG测量结果进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/9cc3157503a0/fmedt-04-920674-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/33065a42612a/fmedt-04-920674-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/d6985c9145ad/fmedt-04-920674-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/4bfd832e4157/fmedt-04-920674-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/21244ee9884d/fmedt-04-920674-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/4b54eaff0fdd/fmedt-04-920674-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/4d2ea8ac3a53/fmedt-04-920674-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/63d5b1f9fa9f/fmedt-04-920674-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/2e56de1b2624/fmedt-04-920674-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/a187481b6516/fmedt-04-920674-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/cdfb7593e6ba/fmedt-04-920674-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/6bde90778bcf/fmedt-04-920674-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/d4c3091c1287/fmedt-04-920674-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/9cc3157503a0/fmedt-04-920674-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/33065a42612a/fmedt-04-920674-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/d6985c9145ad/fmedt-04-920674-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/4bfd832e4157/fmedt-04-920674-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/21244ee9884d/fmedt-04-920674-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/4b54eaff0fdd/fmedt-04-920674-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/4d2ea8ac3a53/fmedt-04-920674-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/63d5b1f9fa9f/fmedt-04-920674-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/2e56de1b2624/fmedt-04-920674-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/a187481b6516/fmedt-04-920674-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/cdfb7593e6ba/fmedt-04-920674-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/6bde90778bcf/fmedt-04-920674-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/d4c3091c1287/fmedt-04-920674-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9d0/9531262/9cc3157503a0/fmedt-04-920674-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Acoustocerebrography in septic patients: A randomized and controlled pilot study.脓毒症患者的听觉脑电描记术:一项随机对照试验性研究。
Front Med Technol. 2022 Sep 14;4:920674. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.920674. eCollection 2022.
2
The prognostic value of neurofilament levels in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy - A prospective, pilot observational study.神经丝蛋白水平对脓毒症相关性脑病患者的预后价值:一项前瞻性、初步观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):e0211184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211184. eCollection 2019.
3
The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.用于重症监护病房谵妄诊断的重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU)和重症监护谵妄筛查清单(ICDSC):临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2012 Jul 3;16(4):R115. doi: 10.1186/cc11407.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC in detecting intensive care unit delirium: A bivariate meta-analysis.CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 对 ICU 谵妄检测的诊断准确性:双变量荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103782. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103782. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
5
Delirium Screening in Neurocritical Care and Stroke Unit Patients: A Pilot Study on the Influence of Neurological Deficits on CAM-ICU and ICDSC Outcome.神经危重症和卒中单元患者的谵妄筛查:神经功能缺损对 CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 结局影响的初步研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Dec;33(3):708-717. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00938-y.
6
A clinical perspective of sepsis-associated delirium.脓毒症相关性谵妄的临床观点。
J Intensive Care. 2016 Mar 23;4:18. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0145-4. eCollection 2016.
7
Delirium in the intensive care setting: A reevaluation of the validity of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC versus the DSM-IV-TR in determining a diagnosis of delirium as part of the daily clinical routine.重症监护环境中的谵妄:在日常临床常规中,重新评估 CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 与 DSM-IV-TR 用于确定谵妄诊断的有效性,以确定诊断为谵妄。
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Dec;15(6):675-683. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516001176. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Comparison of CAM-ICU and ICDSC for the detection of delirium in critically ill patients focusing on relevant clinical outcomes.比较 CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 对 ICU 患者谵妄的检测效果,重点关注相关临床结局。
J Crit Care. 2012 Apr;27(2):212-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
9
Influence of Patient-Specific Covariates on Test Validity of Two Delirium Screening Instruments in Neurocritical Care Patients (DEMON-ICU).神经重症监护患者中两种谵妄筛查工具检测效度的患者特异性协变量影响(DEMON-ICU)。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):452-462. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01319-9. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
The CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC as measures of delirium severity in critically ill adult patients.CAM-ICU-7 和 ICDSC 作为评估危重症成年患者谵妄严重程度的工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0242378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242378. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Approach to Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Wave Monitoring: A Pilot Healthy Brain Study.一种无创颅内压波监测的新方法:健康大脑的初步研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 28;25(13):4042. doi: 10.3390/s25134042.
2
In-Hospital Neurologic Complications, Neuromonitoring, and Long-Term Neurologic Outcomes in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脓毒症患者的住院期神经系统并发症、神经监测和长期神经系统结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;52(3):452-463. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006096. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: The Blood-Brain Barrier and the Sphingolipid Rheostat.脓毒症相关脑病:血脑屏障与鞘脂类调节机制
Front Immunol. 2017 Jun 16;8:597. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00597. eCollection 2017.
2
Post-sepsis cognitive impairment and associated risk factors: A systematic review.脓毒症后认知障碍及相关危险因素的系统评价
Aust Crit Care. 2018 Jul;31(4):242-253. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Potentially modifiable factors contributing to sepsis-associated encephalopathy.可能导致脓毒症相关性脑病的可调节因素。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1075-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4807-z. Epub 2017 May 2.
4
Neuroanatomy of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.脓毒症相关性脑病的神经解剖学。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 21;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1643-z.
5
Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy.脓毒症相关性脑病
Adv Med. 2014;2014:762320. doi: 10.1155/2014/762320. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Biomarkers in septic encephalopathy: a systematic review of clinical studies.脓毒症性脑病中的生物标志物:临床研究的系统评价
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Mar;25(1):56-62. doi: 10.1590/s0103-507x2013000100011.
7
Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis.理解脓毒症中的大脑功能障碍。
Ann Intensive Care. 2013 May 29;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-15.
8
The relationship between delirium duration, white matter integrity, and cognitive impairment in intensive care unit survivors as determined by diffusion tensor imaging: the VISIONS prospective cohort magnetic resonance imaging study*.通过扩散张量成像确定 ICU 幸存者的谵妄持续时间、脑白质完整性和认知障碍之间的关系:VISIONS 前瞻性队列磁共振成像研究*。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):2182-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318250acdc.
9
The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility.脉动的大脑:颅内脉动的实验和临床研究综述。
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2045-8118-8-5.
10
Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.严重脓毒症幸存者的长期认知障碍和功能残疾。
JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1787-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1553.