Yale New Haven Hospital (A.A.S.), New Haven, CT.
VA Connecticut Healthcare System (K.M.A., S.L.F.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jan;65(1):6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.09.014. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
Consequent to increasing COVID-19 infection rates, the Palliative Care (PC) service at a large New England hospital shifted from in-person to telehealth-delivered PC (TPC).
We compared the quality of TPC to in-person PC during the early COVID-19 pandemic.
We conducted an electronic health record review of PC consultations of patients hospitalized during three periods: pre-COVID January, 2020-February, 2020 (in-person); peak-COVID March, 2020-June, 2020 (majority TPC); and post-peak September, 2020-October, 2020 (majority in-person). We examined the relationship between these periods and PC delivery characteristics and quality measures using descriptive and bivariate statistics.
Of 377 patients, 50 were pre-COVID (TPC=0%), 271 peak-COVID (TPC=79.3%), and 56 post-peak (TPC<2%) (representation of PC consult: pre- and post-peak=samples; peak-COVID=all consults). Mean age was 69.3 years (standard deviation=15.5), with 54.9% male, 68.7% White, and 22.8% Black. Age and sex did not differ by period. PC consultations were more likely for goals of care (pre=30.0% vs. peak=53.9% vs. post=57.1%; P = 0.005) or hospice (4.0% vs. 14.4% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.031) during peak-COVID compared to pre-COVID. Rates of assessment of physical (98.0% vs. 63.5% vs. 94.6%, P < 0.001) and psychological symptoms (90.0% vs. 33.1% vs. 67.9%, P < 0.001) were lower during peak relative to pre-COVID and post-peak periods. There were no differences in assessment of patients' social needs, family burden, or goals of care across periods.
The PC service provided high-quality inpatient PC using TPC despite significant strain during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Developing and testing strategies to promote comprehensive symptom control using TPC remains a priority to adjust to potential unmet PC needs.
由于 COVID-19 感染率不断上升,一家新英格兰大型医院的姑息治疗(PC)服务从面对面转变为远程医疗提供的 PC(TPC)。
我们比较了 COVID-19 大流行早期 TPC 与面对面 PC 的质量。
我们对住院患者的 PC 咨询进行了电子病历回顾,这些咨询是在三个时期进行的:COVID-19 前 2020 年 1 月至 2 月(面对面);COVID-19 高峰 2020 年 3 月至 6 月(大部分 TPC);COVID-19 高峰后 2020 年 9 月至 10 月(大部分面对面)。我们使用描述性和双变量统计分析检查了这些时期与 PC 交付特征和质量措施之间的关系。
在 377 名患者中,50 名是 COVID-19 前(TPC=0%),271 名是 COVID-19 高峰(TPC=79.3%),56 名是 COVID-19 高峰后(TPC<2%)(PC 咨询的代表性:前和后高峰=样本;COVID-19 高峰=所有咨询)。平均年龄为 69.3 岁(标准差=15.5),54.9%为男性,68.7%为白人,22.8%为黑人。年龄和性别在各期间无差异。与 COVID-19 前相比,COVID-19 高峰期更有可能进行治疗目标(30.0%对 53.9%对 57.1%;P=0.005)或临终关怀(4.0%对 14.4%对 5.4%;P=0.031)。评估身体(98.0%对 63.5%对 94.6%;P<0.001)和心理症状(90.0%对 33.1%对 67.9%;P<0.001)的比例在高峰期相对 COVID-19 前和后高峰时期较低。在评估患者的社会需求、家庭负担或治疗目标方面,各期间无差异。
尽管在 COVID-19 大流行早期面临巨大压力,姑息治疗服务仍通过远程医疗提供高质量的住院 PC。制定和测试使用 TPC 促进全面症状控制的策略仍然是一个优先事项,以适应潜在的未满足的 PC 需求。