• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信念的架构:开放性与他性。

The architecture of creditions: Openness and otherness.

作者信息

Davies Oliver

机构信息

King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

LSRI Research Institute at Campion Hall, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 21;13:926489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926489. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926489
PMID:36211896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9535529/
Abstract

"Creditions" are an important new idea within our contemporary understanding of the human. They potentially represent the unity of both humanistic and scientific ways of modeling the human. As such, "creditions" offer a bridge between current thinking in science and the humanities and the development of a more powerfully integrated interdisciplinary hermeneutic. It is argued in this article that the questions posed by "creditions" (as developed by Rüdiger Seitz and Hans-Ferdinand Angel) cannot be resolved through reduction but rather only through cohesive systematization. In contrast with coherence in conventional science, "credition-centered" thinking finds expression in systemic ways. The complex humanity of the reflective subject resists reduction; and calls to be analyzed in terms of sociality, the identification of "otherness" and interactive engagement. In this context then a thinking which is attuned to complexity and to otherness has an important place in the expression of the social subject as a complex and relational self, in today's world. These are not however social realities as we find them either in large-scale social schemata, or indeed in the intimacy of the face to face. Rather credition-centered learning falls between these two categories and is best described as "the productive knowledge of community," where community is generated by productive enhancement and the embrace of otherness over time.

摘要

“信用特质”是我们当代对人类理解中的一个重要新观念。它们可能代表了对人类进行建模的人文方式与科学方式的统一。因此,“信用特质”为当前科学与人文领域的思想以及更强大的综合跨学科诠释学的发展搭建了一座桥梁。本文认为,“信用特质”(由吕迪格·塞茨和汉斯 - 费迪南德·安吉尔提出)所引发的问题无法通过简化来解决,而只能通过连贯的系统化来解决。与传统科学中的连贯性不同,“以信用特质为中心”的思维以系统的方式得以体现。反思性主体的复杂人性抗拒简化;并且需要从社会性、“他性”的识别以及互动参与的角度进行分析。在这种背景下,一种顺应复杂性和他性的思维在当今世界将社会主体表达为一个复杂且具有关联性的自我方面具有重要地位。然而,这些并非我们在大规模社会模式中或者面对面的亲密关系中所发现的社会现实。相反,以信用特质为中心的学习介于这两类之间,最好被描述为“社区的生产性知识”,其中社区是通过生产性增强以及随着时间推移对他性的接纳而产生的。

相似文献

1
The architecture of creditions: Openness and otherness.信念的架构:开放性与他性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 21;13:926489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926489. eCollection 2022.
2
Believing is seeing: A Buddhist theory of creditions.信即见:一种关于信念的佛教理论。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 3;13:938731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938731. eCollection 2022.
3
Pathways and crossroads to creditions: Insights from a retrospective view.可信度的途径与交叉点:回顾性视角的见解
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 4;13:942590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942590. eCollection 2022.
4
Embracing Diversity: the Complexities of Reckoning and Accepting Otherness.拥抱多样性:理解和接受他者的复杂性。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):30-46. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09582-9. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
"Making strange": a role for the humanities in medical education.“制造陌生”:人文学科在医学教育中的作用。
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):973-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000269.
6
[Problems of the culture concept and the phenomenon of otherness. Considerations of the theoretical-conceptional basis of transcultural nursing as a subject of teaching].
Pflege. 1998 Jun;11(3):156-60.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Intersubjectivity, otherness, and thirdness: A necessary relationship.主体间性、他者性与第三性:一种必然的关系。
Int J Psychoanal. 2016 Aug;97(4):1095-104. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12432. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Belief formation - A driving force for brain evolution.信念形成——大脑进化的驱动力。
Brain Cogn. 2020 Apr;140:105548. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105548. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
From Believing to Belief: A General Theoretical Model.从相信到信念:一个通用的理论模型。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Sep;30(9):1254-1264. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01292. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language.教授制作石器:支持语言起源技术假说的新实验证据。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14322-y.
4
Cultural Affordances: Scaffolding Local Worlds Through Shared Intentionality and Regimes of Attention.文化可供性:通过共享意向性和注意力机制搭建地方世界
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 26;7:1090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090. eCollection 2016.
5
Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate.综合信息理论:从意识到其物理基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jul;17(7):450-61. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.44. Epub 2016 May 26.
6
Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex.自然语言揭示了覆盖人类大脑皮层的语义图谱。
Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):453-8. doi: 10.1038/nature17637.
7
Toward a second-person neuroscience.迈向第二人称神经科学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):393-414. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000660.
8
The two-brain approach: how can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction?双脑研究方法:相互作用的大脑如何能让我们了解社会互动?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 24;6:215. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00215. eCollection 2012.
9
The interactive brain hypothesis.交互大脑假说。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 7;6:163. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163. eCollection 2012.
10
Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution.石器、语言与人类进化中的大脑
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 12;367(1585):75-87. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0099.