Kawamura Hirobumi, Tsujishita Morihiro
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Konan Women's University: 6-2-23 Morikita-machi, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-0001, Japan.
Naragakuen University, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2022 Oct;34(10):704-709. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.704. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation contralateral to the pain site for analgesia to identify the effective stimulation intensity. [Participants and Methods] Ten healthy adult females were recruited for the study. The same heat stimulation was applied to the left wrist joint of each participant to induce pain, serving as the control. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was then randomly administered to the right wrist, corresponding to the same dermatome contralateral to the painful site, at the intensities of comfortable stimulation, pain threshold, and maximum pain. The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale and by analysis of heart rate variability. [Results] The Visual Analogue Scale score was significantly lower after stimulation with the maximum pain intensity than that for control, and there were no significant differences among the intensities of comfortable stimulation, pain threshold, and maximum pain. No significant differences were found among the groups in terms of high and low-to-high frequency components. [Conclusion] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at the maximum pain intensity to the dermatome area contralateral to that of the dorsal pain site of the left wrist was considered effective.
[目的] 本研究旨在比较在疼痛部位对侧进行经皮电神经刺激的镇痛效果,以确定有效的刺激强度。[参与者与方法] 招募了10名健康成年女性参与本研究。对每位参与者的左手腕关节施加相同的热刺激以诱发疼痛,作为对照。然后将经皮电神经刺激随机施加于右手腕,对应于疼痛部位对侧相同的皮节,刺激强度分别为舒适刺激强度、疼痛阈值和最大疼痛强度。使用视觉模拟评分法并通过心率变异性分析来评估经皮电神经刺激的效果。[结果] 最大疼痛强度刺激后的视觉模拟评分显著低于对照,舒适刺激强度、疼痛阈值和最大疼痛强度之间无显著差异。各组在高频和低频到高频成分方面无显著差异。[结论] 对左手腕背侧疼痛部位对侧的皮节区域进行最大疼痛强度的经皮电神经刺激被认为是有效的。