Babalola Oladimeji Ranti, Itakpe Shopekhai E, Oladunjoye Tale Olajire, Akpan James Imeh, Madubueze Christian C, Koyejo Temitayo
Division of Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Nigeria.
Department of Anaesthesia, National Orthopaedic Hospital, Igbobi-Lagos, Nigeria.
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;12(2):23-27. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_125_22. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
Day-case anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has the potential benefit of reduced hospital stay and reduced cost of care. The goal of this preliminary report was to compare the outcome of day-case arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with those of in-patient care in terms of pain control and short-term functional outcome.
This was a prospective comparative study involving patients who had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed in our unit between January 2019 to July 2021 for isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture. The patients were offered the option of in-patient and day-case anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. All cases were isolated anterior cruciate ligament ruptures with no other ligament injury.
A total of twenty-one-day case and twenty-five in-patient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were managed during the period of the study. The median numeric pain scores at day 2 and 7 in the day case group was 8.0 (IQR=2.0) and 5.0 (IQR= 3.0) respectively and in-patient group was 7.0 (IQR =1.5) and 4.0 (IQR= 2.0) respectively. The international knee documentation score (IKDC) at 6 months in the day case and in-patient groups were 68.6 (IQR= 9.3) and 67.2 (IQR= 25.0) respectively. The Mann-Whitney U test indicated that patients who had ACL reconstruction on in-patient care basis had statistically significant lower visual analogue scale pain scores on the second (z=-2.58, = 0.01) and seventh (z=-3.41 = 0.001) post-operative days compared to patients who had ACL reconstruction on day case basis. There was no statistically significant difference in the median IKDC scores of both groups at 6 months. The cost of care in the day case group was 40% lower than those of the in-patient group.
Although the cost of care in the day case group appeared lower as compared to the in-patient group, the day case group had higher post-operative pain scores compared to the in-patient group. Although the post-operative functional scores were similar in both groups, this was not statistically significant.
日间手术前交叉韧带重建具有缩短住院时间和降低护理成本的潜在优势。本初步报告的目的是比较日间手术关节镜下前交叉韧带重建与住院治疗在疼痛控制和短期功能结局方面的结果。
这是一项前瞻性比较研究,纳入了2019年1月至2021年7月在本单位因单纯前交叉韧带断裂而进行前交叉韧带重建的患者。患者可选择住院或日间手术前交叉韧带重建。所有病例均为单纯前交叉韧带断裂,无其他韧带损伤。
在研究期间,共进行了21例日间手术和25例住院前交叉韧带重建。日间手术组术后第2天和第7天的数字疼痛评分中位数分别为8.0(四分位间距=2.0)和5.0(四分位间距=3.0),住院组分别为7.0(四分位间距=1.5)和4.0(四分位间距=2.0)。日间手术组和住院组术后6个月的国际膝关节文献委员会评分(IKDC)分别为68.6(四分位间距=9.3)和67.2(四分位间距=25.0)。曼-惠特尼U检验表明,与日间手术进行前交叉韧带重建的患者相比,住院进行前交叉韧带重建的患者在术后第2天(z=-2.58,P=0.01)和第7天(z=-3.41,P=0.001)的视觉模拟评分疼痛得分在统计学上显著更低。两组术后6个月的IKDC评分中位数无统计学显著差异。日间手术组的护理成本比住院组低40%。
尽管日间手术组的护理成本似乎低于住院组,但日间手术组术后疼痛评分高于住院组。尽管两组术后功能评分相似,但无统计学显著性差异。