Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 10;18(10):e1009945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009945. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by uncontrollable repetitive actions thought to rely on abnormalities within fundamental instrumental learning systems. We investigated cognitive and computational mechanisms underlying Pavlovian biases on instrumental behavior in both clinical OCD patients and healthy controls using a Pavlovian-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) task. PIT is typically evidenced by increased responding in the presence of a positive (previously rewarded) Pavlovian cue, and reduced responding in the presence of a negative cue. Thirty OCD patients and thirty-one healthy controls completed the Pavlovian Instrumental Transfer test, which included instrumental training, Pavlovian training for positive, negative and neutral cues, and a PIT phase in which participants performed the instrumental task in the presence of the Pavlovian cues. Modified Rescorla-Wagner models were fitted to trial-by-trial data of participants to estimate underlying computational mechanism and quantify individual differences during training and transfer stages. Bayesian hierarchical methods were used to estimate free parameters and compare the models. Behavioral and computational results indicated a weaker Pavlovian influence on instrumental behavior in OCD patients than in HC, especially for negative Pavlovian cues. Our results contrast with the increased PIT effects reported for another set of disorders characterized by compulsivity, substance use disorders, in which PIT is enhanced. A possible reason for the reduced PIT in OCD may be impairment in using the contextual information provided by the cues to appropriately adjust behavior, especially when inhibiting responding when a negative cue is present. This study provides deeper insight into our understanding of deficits in OCD from the perspective of Pavlovian influences on instrumental behavior and may have implications for OCD treatment modalities focused on reducing compulsive behaviors.
强迫症(OCD)的特征是无法控制的重复动作,据认为这些动作依赖于基本工具学习系统的异常。我们使用条件性-工具性转移(PIT)任务研究了临床 OCD 患者和健康对照者的条件性偏好在工具性行为中的认知和计算机制。PIT 通常表现为在阳性(以前奖励过的)条件性线索存在时反应增加,而在阴性线索存在时反应减少。30 名 OCD 患者和 31 名健康对照者完成了条件性-工具性转移测试,该测试包括工具性训练、阳性、阴性和中性线索的条件性训练,以及 PIT 阶段,在此阶段参与者在条件性线索存在的情况下执行工具性任务。对参与者的逐次试验数据进行了修正的 Rescorla-Wagner 模型拟合,以估计基础计算机制并量化训练和转移阶段的个体差异。使用贝叶斯层次方法估计自由参数并比较模型。行为和计算结果表明,与健康对照组相比,OCD 患者的条件性线索对工具性行为的影响较弱,尤其是对阴性条件性线索的影响较弱。我们的结果与另一组以强迫性为特征的障碍(物质使用障碍)报告的增强的 PIT 效应形成对比,在这些障碍中 PIT 增强。OCD 中 PIT 减少的一个可能原因是,在使用线索提供的上下文信息来适当调整行为方面存在障碍,尤其是在存在阴性线索时抑制反应。这项研究从条件性线索对工具性行为的影响的角度提供了对 OCD 缺陷的更深入理解,并且可能对专注于减少强迫行为的 OCD 治疗模式具有意义。