Yu Quanhao, Gao Feng, Li Chuting, Xia Jie, Cao Yanyuan, Wang Xiang, Xiao Chuman, Lu Jingjie, Liu Qian, Fan Jie, Zhu Xiongzhao
Medical Psychological Center, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Medical Psychological Institute of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;24(4):100531. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100531. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
Previous research has found that compulsions in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are associated with an imbalance between goal-directed and habitual responses. However, the cognitive mechanisms underlying how goal-directed and habitual behaviors are learned, and how these learning deficits affect the response process, remain unclear. The present study aimed to investigate these cognitive mechanisms and examine how they were involved in the mechanism of compulsions.
A total of 49 patients with OCD and 38 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited to perform the revised "slip of action test". A reinforcement learning model was constructed, and model parameters including learning rates, reinforcement sensitivity, and perseveration were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian approach. Comparisons of these parameters were made between the OCD group and HCs, and the associations with performance during the outcome devalued stage and clinical presentations were assessed.
In the outcome devalued stage, patients with OCD exhibited greatet responsiveness to the devalued outcome, indicating their impairment in flexible and goal-directed behavioral control. Computational modeling further revealed that, during the instrumental learning stage, patients with OCD showed reduced learning rates, decreased perseveration, and heightened reinforcement sensitivity as compared with HCs. The learning rate and perseveration during instrumental learning were significantly correlated with the performance in the outcome devalued stage and compulsive scores in OCD.
The results indicate that patients with OCD exhibit deficits in updating the associative strength based on prediction errors and are more likely to doubt established correct associations during goal-directed and habitual learning. These deficits may contribute to the inflexible goal-directed behavioral control and are involved in the mechanism of compulsion in OCD.
先前的研究发现,强迫症(OCD)中的强迫行为与目标导向反应和习惯反应之间的失衡有关。然而,目标导向行为和习惯行为的学习背后的认知机制,以及这些学习缺陷如何影响反应过程,仍不清楚。本研究旨在探究这些认知机制,并检验它们如何参与强迫行为的机制。
共招募了49名强迫症患者和38名健康对照者(HCs)来进行修订后的“行动失误测试”。构建了一个强化学习模型,并使用分层贝叶斯方法估计包括学习率、强化敏感性和固执性在内的模型参数。比较了强迫症组和健康对照者之间的这些参数,并评估了它们与结果贬值阶段的表现和临床表现之间的关联。
在结果贬值阶段,强迫症患者对贬值结果表现出更大的反应性,表明他们在灵活的目标导向行为控制方面存在损害。计算模型进一步显示,在工具性学习阶段,与健康对照者相比,强迫症患者的学习率降低、固执性下降且强化敏感性增强。工具性学习期间的学习率和固执性与结果贬值阶段的表现和强迫症的强迫分数显著相关。
结果表明,强迫症患者在基于预测误差更新关联强度方面存在缺陷,并且在目标导向和习惯学习过程中更有可能怀疑已确立的正确关联。这些缺陷可能导致目标导向行为控制缺乏灵活性,并参与强迫症的强迫行为机制。