• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注急诊体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)团队的患者安全文化:一项横断面调查。

Concern for Patient Safety Culture of ECMO Team in Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

机构信息

Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221129168. doi: 10.1177/00469580221129168.

DOI:10.1177/00469580221129168
PMID:36217754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9558865/
Abstract

To evaluate the patient safety culture status of the ECMO team in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the emergency department of Xiangya Hospital from September 1st to 30th, 2021. The Chinese version of HSOPSC electronic questionnaire was administered to all staff involved in ECMO management and initiation. A total of 152 ECMO team members completed the survey. Among the 12 dimensions of patient safety culture, 4 dimensions recorded relatively high positive response rates (>50%): organizational learning-continuous improvement (87.1%), teamwork within units (86.8%), feedback and communication about errors (58.5%), and supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting patient safety (55.6%). 8 dimensions recorded relatively low positive response rates (<50%): nonpunitive responses to errors (24.1%), hospital handoffs and transitions (27.1%), staffing (28.6%), the frequency of event reporting (32.4%), teamwork across units (33.2%), communication openness (39.7%), management support for patient safety (48.7%), and overall perceptions of patient safety (49.3%). The overall level of patient safety culture was measured at 47.6%. The ECMO team should immediately address issues of nonpunitive responses to errors, hospital handoffs and transitions, and staffing to improve the safety of ECMO. Going forward, the head of the ECMO team should regard patient safety culture as a top priority, improve staff satisfaction, standardize the transfer and handover process, and create a blame-free environment to facilitate event reporting.

摘要

评估一家三级医院急诊科 ECMO 团队的患者安全文化状况。2021 年 9 月 1 日至 30 日,在湘雅医院急诊科进行了横断面调查。采用 HSOPSC 电子问卷中文版对所有参与 ECMO 管理和启动的工作人员进行了问卷调查。共有 152 名 ECMO 团队成员完成了调查。在患者安全文化的 12 个维度中,有 4 个维度记录了较高的积极响应率(>50%):组织学习-持续改进(87.1%)、单位内团队合作(86.8%)、错误反馈和沟通(58.5%)以及主管/经理期望和促进患者安全的行动(55.6%)。8 个维度记录了较低的积极响应率(<50%):对错误的非惩罚性反应(24.1%)、医院交接和过渡(27.1%)、人员配备(28.6%)、事件报告频率(32.4%)、跨单位团队合作(33.2%)、沟通开放性(39.7%)、管理层对患者安全的支持(48.7%)和整体患者安全感知(49.3%)。患者安全文化的总体水平为 47.6%。ECMO 团队应立即解决对错误的非惩罚性反应、医院交接和过渡以及人员配备等问题,以提高 ECMO 的安全性。今后,ECMO 团队负责人应将患者安全文化作为重中之重,提高员工满意度,规范交接流程,营造无责环境,促进事件报告。

相似文献

1
Concern for Patient Safety Culture of ECMO Team in Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Survey.关注急诊体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)团队的患者安全文化:一项横断面调查。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221129168. doi: 10.1177/00469580221129168.
2
How Does Patient Safety Culture in the Surgical Departments Compare to the Rest of the County Hospitals in Xiaogan City of China?中国孝感市县级医院外科的患者安全文化与其他科室相比如何?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 26;14(10):1123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101123.
3
Nurses' perceptions of patient safety culture and adverse events in Hail City, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional approach to improving healthcare safety.沙特阿拉伯海尔市护士对患者安全文化和不良事件的认知:改善医疗保健安全的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e084741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084741.
4
Comparing Trainee and Staff Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture.比较实习生与工作人员对患者安全文化的认知
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):116-122. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001255.
5
Patient safety culture in a university hospital emergency department in Switzerland - a survey study.瑞士一家大学医院急诊科的患者安全文化——一项调查研究。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Mar 15;36(2):Doc14. doi: 10.3205/zma001222. eCollection 2019.
6
A cross-sectional survey on patient safety culture among healthcare providers in the Upper East region of Ghana.加纳上东部地区医疗保健提供者的患者安全文化横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0221208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221208. eCollection 2019.
7
Patient safety culture among nurses.护士群体中的患者安全文化。
Int Nurs Rev. 2015 Mar;62(1):102-10. doi: 10.1111/inr.12159. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
8
Patient safety culture in the Operating Room of an emergency hospital in Amazonas: perspectives from the healthcare team.急诊医院手术室的患者安全文化:医疗团队的观点。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2024 Jul 19;51:e20243743. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243743-en. eCollection 2024.
9
Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Three Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯三家医院护士对患者安全文化的认知。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Jul;50(4):422-431. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12394. Epub 2018 May 14.
10
Handoffs, safety culture, and practices: evidence from the hospital survey on patient safety culture.交接班、安全文化与实践:来自医院患者安全文化调查的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 12;16:254. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1502-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare workers' perceptions of patient safety culture in emergency departments: a scoping review.医护人员对急诊科患者安全文化的认知:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e097086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097086.
2
Patient safety culture and associated factors of regional public hospitals in Addis Ababa.亚的斯亚贝巴地区公立医院的患者安全文化及其相关因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11262-y.
3
ICU Nurses' Perception of Sensitive Indicators of Quality of Care for ECMO Patients in Guizhou Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国贵州省ICU护士对体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)患者护理质量敏感指标的认知:一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 May 30;17:1417-1426. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S453800. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19: possible mechanisms and therapeutic management.新型冠状病毒肺炎中的急性呼吸窘迫综合征:可能机制与治疗管理
Pneumonia (Nathan). 2021 Dec 6;13(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41479-021-00092-9.
2
Transcultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the mainland China version of Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey based on 50 nursing homes in China.中国大陆版养老机构患者安全文化调查问卷的跨文化调适与心理计量学评估:基于中国 50 家养老机构的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 22;11(6):e043994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043994.
3
Survival and Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest With VA-ECMO Rescue Therapy.采用VA-ECMO挽救治疗的心脏骤停后的生存情况及预后
Shock. 2021 Dec 1;56(6):939-947. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001809.
4
Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Hospital Settings.评估医院环境中的患者安全文化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2466. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052466.
5
Hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC): a multi-method approach for target-language instrument translation, adaptation, and validation to improve the equivalence of meaning for cross-cultural research.医院患者安全文化调查(HSOPSC):一种多方法途径,用于目标语言工具的翻译、改编和验证,以提高跨文化研究中意义的等效性。
BMC Nurs. 2020 Apr 13;19:23. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00419-9. eCollection 2020.
6
Joint Society of Critical Care Medicine-Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Task Force Position Paper on the Role of the Intensivist in the Initiation and Management of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.联合危重病医学会-体外生命支持组织特别工作组关于强化治疗医师在体外膜氧合启动和管理中的作用的立场文件。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;48(6):838-846. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004330.
7
Preparing for the Most Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: The Potential Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.为新冠肺炎重症患者做准备:体外膜肺氧合的潜在作用
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1245-1246. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2342.
8
Leading Change in Nurse Bedside Shift Report.引领护士床边交接班报告变革。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;55(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
Improved Survival With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Despite Progressive Metabolic Derangement Associated With Prolonged Resuscitation.体外心肺复苏术尽管与延长复苏相关的代谢恶化相关,但仍能提高生存率。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):877-886. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042173. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
10
Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies.医院患者安全文化调查(HSPSC):62 项国际研究心理测量特性的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e026896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896.