• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估计复杂多维调节变量的效果:以潜在类别调节为例检验物质使用服务的干预效果差异。

Estimating the Effects of a Complex, Multidimensional Moderator: An Example of Latent Class Moderation to Examine Differential Intervention Effects of Substance Use Services.

机构信息

Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, 1747 W Roosevelt Rd., IL, 60608, Chicago, USA.

Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, 111 Alison Hall West, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2023 Apr;24(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01448-3. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-022-01448-3
PMID:36223045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10090219/
Abstract

Improvements in substance use disorder recovery may be achieved by recognizing that effective interventions do not work equally well for all individuals. Heterogeneity of intervention effects is traditionally examined as a function of a single variable, such as gender or baseline severity. However, responsiveness to an intervention is likely a result of multiple, intersecting factors. Latent class moderation enables the examination of heterogeneity in intervention effects across subgroups characterized by profiles of characteristics. This study analyzed data from adolescents (aged 13 to 18 years old) who needed treatment for cannabis use (n = 14,854) and participated in the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs to evaluate differential effects of substance use services on cannabis use outcomes. We demonstrate an adjusted three-step approach using weights that account for measurement error; sample codes in Mplus and Latent Gold are provided and data are publicly available. Indicators of the latent class moderator comprised six contextual (e.g., recovery environment risk) and individual (e.g., internal mental distress) risk factors. The latent class moderator comprised four subgroups: low risk (21.1%), social risk (21.1%), environmental risk (12.5%), and mixed risk (45.2%). Limited moderation of associations between level of care and any past 90-day cannabis use were observed. In predicting number of cannabis use-days, compared to individuals with low risk, those with environmental risk showed improved outcomes from intensive outpatient care whereas individuals with social risk and mixed risk showed improved outcomes from residential care (all compared to early intervention/outpatient care). Latent class moderation holds potential to elucidate heterogeneity in intervention effectiveness that otherwise may go undetected.

摘要

改善物质使用障碍的康复效果,可以通过认识到有效的干预措施并非对所有个体都同样有效。干预效果的异质性传统上是作为单个变量(如性别或基线严重程度)的函数来检查的。然而,对干预措施的反应可能是多种相互交织的因素的结果。潜在类别调节使我们能够在以特征分布为特征的亚组中检查干预效果的异质性。本研究分析了需要治疗大麻使用的青少年(年龄在 13 至 18 岁之间,n=14854)的数据,并参与了全球个体需求评估,以评估物质使用服务对大麻使用结果的差异影响。我们展示了一种使用权重调整的三步调整方法,这些权重可以纠正测量误差;提供了 Mplus 和 Latent Gold 中的样本代码,并且数据是公开的。潜在类别调节因素包括六个环境(例如,康复环境风险)和个体(例如,内部心理困扰)风险因素。潜在类别调节因素包括四个亚组:低风险(21.1%)、社会风险(21.1%)、环境风险(12.5%)和混合风险(45.2%)。观察到护理水平与任何过去 90 天的大麻使用之间的关联的调节作用有限。在预测大麻使用天数方面,与低风险个体相比,环境风险个体从强化门诊护理中获得了更好的结果,而社会风险和混合风险个体从住院护理中获得了更好的结果(所有这些与早期干预/门诊护理相比)。潜在类别调节有可能阐明干预效果的异质性,否则可能无法发现这种异质性。

相似文献

1
Estimating the Effects of a Complex, Multidimensional Moderator: An Example of Latent Class Moderation to Examine Differential Intervention Effects of Substance Use Services.估计复杂多维调节变量的效果:以潜在类别调节为例检验物质使用服务的干预效果差异。
Prev Sci. 2023 Apr;24(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01448-3. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
4
Identifying Subgroups of Cannabis Users Based on Help-Seeking Preferences: A Latent Class Analysis.基于求助偏好识别大麻使用者亚组:潜在类别分析
Eur Addict Res. 2022;28(5):331-339. doi: 10.1159/000524938. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Self-reported mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with alcohol and cannabis use: a latent class analysis.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的自我报告心理健康状况及其与酒精和大麻使用的关联:潜在类别分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03917-z.
6
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
7
Patterns of Substance Use and Associations with Mental, Physical, and Social Functioning: A Latent Class Analysis of a National Sample of U.S. Adults Ages 30-80.物质使用模式与精神、身体和社会功能的关联:一项对美国 30-80 岁成年人全国样本的潜在类别分析。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(1):131-139. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1843059. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
Polysubstance use in young people accessing residential and day-treatment services for substance use: substance use profiles, psychiatric comorbidity and treatment completion.年轻人在接受物质使用住院和日间治疗服务时的多种物质使用情况:物质使用特征、精神共病和治疗完成情况。
Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):3110-3120. doi: 10.1111/add.16008. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
9
Peer Network Counseling Effects on Substance Use: an Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis Integrating Three Randomized Controlled Trials.同伴网络咨询对物质使用的影响:整合三项随机对照试验的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1510-1522. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01468-z. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
10
Stress and Affect as Daily Risk Factors for Substance Use Patterns: an Application of Latent Class Analysis for Daily Diary Data.压力和情绪作为物质使用模式的日常风险因素:基于日常日记数据的潜在类别分析的应用。
Prev Sci. 2022 May;23(4):598-607. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01305-9. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient characteristics associated with their level of twelve-step attendance prior to entry into treatment for substance use disorders.与物质使用障碍患者进入治疗前的十二步出席水平相关的患者特征。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Feb 14;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00542-5.
2
Dispositional coping profiles moderate the links between racial discrimination and mental health in Black Americans.性格应对方式调节了美国黑人种族歧视与心理健康之间的联系。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2025 Jan 9. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000728.
3
Advancing Intervention and Prevention Research for Behavioral Health Problems Through Data Synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Need to Focus Research on Adolescent Cannabis Use Interventions.需要将研究重点放在青少年大麻使用干预措施上。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-012336. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
2
Moderators of Substance Use Disorder Treatment for Adolescents.青少年物质使用障碍治疗的调节因素。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021 Jul-Aug;50(4):498-509. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1790379. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Latent Class Mediation: A Comparison of Six Approaches.潜在类别中介分析:六种方法的比较。
通过数据综合推进行为健康问题的干预和预防研究。
Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1682-1689. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01591-5. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Jul-Aug;56(4):543-557. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1771674. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
4
Identifying optimal level-of-care placement decisions for adolescent substance use treatment.确定青少年物质使用治疗的最佳护理水平安置决策。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107991. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107991. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Trends in Cannabis Treatment Admissions in Adolescents/Young Adults: Analysis of TEDS-A 1992 to 2016.青少年和年轻成人的大麻治疗入院趋势:1992 年至 2016 年 TEDS-A 分析。
J Addict Med. 2020 Jul/Aug;14(4):e29-e36. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000586.
6
Association Between Recreational Marijuana Legalization in the United States and Changes in Marijuana Use and Cannabis Use Disorder From 2008 to 2016.美国休闲大麻合法化与 2008 年至 2016 年期间大麻使用和大麻使用障碍变化的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):165-171. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3254.
7
An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders.针对患有慢性物质使用障碍者的康复管理检查(RMC)的实验性评估。
Eval Program Plann. 2003 Aug;26(3):339-352. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00037-5.
8
Inverse Propensity Score Weighting with a Latent Class Exposure: Estimating the Causal Effect of Reported Reasons for Alcohol Use on Problem Alcohol Use 16 Years Later.采用潜在类别暴露的逆倾向评分加权法:估计报告的饮酒原因对 16 年后问题性饮酒的因果效应。
Prev Sci. 2019 Apr;20(3):394-406. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0883-8.
9
Two-Step Estimation of Models Between Latent Classes and External Variables.两步估计潜在类别与外部变量之间的模型。
Psychometrika. 2018 Dec;83(4):871-892. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9592-7. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
10
Comparing the Performance of Improved Classify-Analyze Approaches For Distal Outcomes in Latent Profile Analysis.比较潜在剖面分析中用于远端结果的改进分类分析方法的性能。
Methodology (Gott). 2016 Oct;12(4):107-116. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000114. Epub 2016 Dec 5.