相似文献
1
The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science: What we know and what scientists can do about it.
EMBO Rep. 2020 Apr 3;21(4):e50205. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050205.
2
Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870. eCollection 2023.
3
Extended cognition in science communication.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Nov;23(8):982-95. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476798. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
4
The spread of fake science: Lexical concreteness, proximity, misinformation sharing, and the moderating role of subjective knowledge.
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):55-74. doi: 10.1177/0963662520966165. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
5
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
6
Category theory and foundations of life science: A structuralist perspective on cognition.
Biosystems. 2021 May;203:104376. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104376. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
7
Expression unleashed: The evolutionary and cognitive foundations of human communication.
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 5;46:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000012.
8
Enhancing the engagement of U.S. private foundations with conservation science.
Conserv Biol. 2008 Dec;22(6):1477-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01046.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
9
Estimating the heritability of cognitive traits across dog breeds reveals highly heritable inhibitory control and communication factors.
Anim Cogn. 2020 Sep;23(5):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01400-4. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
引用本文的文献
1
Moralization and extremism robustly amplify myside sharing.
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Apr 10;2(4):pgad078. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad078. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Promoting engagement with quality communication in social media.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275534. eCollection 2022.
3
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06574. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Potential, Challenges, and Threats for the Application of New Breeding Techniques by the Private Plant Breeding Sector in the EU.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 25;11:582011. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.582011. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Framing messages for vaccination supporters.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Dec;26(4):567-578. doi: 10.1037/xap0000271. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
The amplification of risk in experimental diffusion chains.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 5;112(18):5631-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421883112. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition.
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Jul;20(7):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
5
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study.
BMJ. 2014 Dec 9;349:g7015. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7015.
6
Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317505111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
7
The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth.
Cogn Sci. 2002 Sep 1;26(5):521-562. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1.
Zotero 插件