NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh; Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Ann Oncol. 2022 Dec;33(12):1250-1268. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.159. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety.
One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015.
With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI -0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals.
随机、双盲的 OlympiA 试验比较了 1 年的口服聚(腺嘌呤二核苷酸-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂奥拉帕利与匹配的安慰剂作为胚系 BRCA1 或 BRCA2(gBRCA1/2pv)致病性或可能致病性变异和高风险、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性、早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者的辅助治疗。第一次预先指定的中期分析(IA)先前证明了浸润性无病生存期(IDFS)和远处无病生存期(DDFS)的统计学显著改善。奥拉帕利组的死亡人数少于安慰剂组,但总生存期(OS)的差异没有达到统计学意义。我们现在报告 OS 的预先指定的第二次 IA,并更新 IDFS、DDFS 和安全性。
1836 名患者在(新)辅助化疗、手术和放疗(如果需要)后随机分配至奥拉帕利或安慰剂组。激素受体阳性癌症同时给予内分泌治疗。此次 IA 中 OS 的统计学显著意义需要 P < 0.015。
中位随访 3.5 年后,奥拉帕利组的 OS 第二次 IA 显示出相对于安慰剂组的显著改善[风险比 0.68;98.5%置信区间(CI)0.47-0.97;P = 0.009]。奥拉帕利组的 4 年 OS 为 89.8%,安慰剂组为 86.4%(Δ 3.4%,95%CI -0.1%至 6.8%)。奥拉帕利组与安慰剂组的 4 年 IDFS 分别为 82.7%和 75.4%(Δ 7.3%,95%CI 3.0%至 11.5%)和 4 年 DDFS 分别为 86.5%和 79.1%(Δ 7.4%,95%CI 3.6%至 11.3%)。OS、IDFS 和 DDFS 的亚组分析显示出主要亚组的获益。未发现新的安全性信号,包括无新发急性髓系白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征病例。
中位随访 3.5 年后,OlympiA 表明与安慰剂相比,gBRCA1/2pv 相关 EBC 患者接受辅助奥拉帕利治疗可显著改善 OS,同时先前报告的 IDFS 和 DDFS 的统计学显著终点也得到维持,且无新的安全性信号。