• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情管理和控制的利益相关者分析:以伊朗为例。

Stakeholders analysis of COVID-19 management and control: a case of Iran.

机构信息

Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):1909. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14219-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-14219-0
PMID:36229818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9559115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic is a multi-faceted phenomenon with many political, economic and social consequences. Success in managing and controlling this pandemic depends on the coordinated efforts of many organizations and institutions. Therefore, this study aimed to identify and analyze the actors and stakeholders related to managing and controlling this pandemic in Iran.

METHODS

This mix-method stakeholder analysis was conducted in 2021 nationwide as retrospectively. The purposive sampling method was applied when inviting eligible participants to participate in the study. Our study was conducted in two phases. In the qualitative phase, data were collected using a semi-structured interview. An interview guide was developed based on the WHO stakeholder analysis framework. In the quantitative phase, we used a questionnaire developed based on the study framework. Each question was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with a score greater than 4 was considered as high, 3-4 was considered as moderate, and 1-3 was considered as low. Data were analyzed using framework analysis, WHO stakeholders' analysis framework and MENDELOW matrix. MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software Version 11 and Policy Maker software (Version. 4) were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 48 stakeholders were identified. Ministry of Health (MoH), National Headquarters for Coronavirus Control (NHCC) had the highest participation level, high supportive position, and knowledge of the subject. The Parliament of Iran (PoI), Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) had the highest power/influence during the Covid-19 epidemic. Only two stakeholders (6.06%) had high participation, and 18.18% had moderate participation. All stakeholders except for the NHCC and the MoH lacked appropriate knowledge of the subject. Furthermore, only three stakeholders (9.09%) had high power/influence.

CONCLUSION

Given the multidimensional nature of Covid-19, most institutions and organizations were involved in managing this pandemic. Stakeholders with high power/authority and resources had a low/moderate participation level and a moderate supportive position. Moreover, organizations with a high supportive position and participation had low power/authority and resources to cope with COVID-19.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行是一种多方面的现象,具有许多政治、经济和社会后果。成功管理和控制这一大流行病取决于许多组织和机构的协调努力。因此,本研究旨在确定和分析与伊朗管理和控制这一大流行病有关的行为者和利益攸关方。

方法

本混合方法利益攸关方分析于 2021 年在全国范围内进行,回顾性研究。在邀请合格参与者参与研究时,采用了目的性抽样方法。我们的研究分为两个阶段进行。在定性阶段,使用半结构式访谈收集数据。访谈指南是根据世卫组织利益攸关方分析框架制定的。在定量阶段,我们使用了根据研究框架制定的问卷。每个问题都在 5 点李克特量表上进行评分,评分大于 4 被认为是高,3-4 是中等,1-3 是低。使用框架分析、世卫组织利益攸关方分析框架和 MENDELOW 矩阵对数据进行分析。MAXQDA 定性数据分析软件版本 11 和决策者软件(版本 4)用于数据分析。

结果

共确定了 48 个利益攸关方。卫生部(MoH)、国家冠状病毒控制总部(NHCC)的参与度最高,支持度和对主题的了解程度最高。伊朗议会(PoI)、伊斯兰革命卫队(IRGC)和伊朗伊斯兰共和国广播公司(IRIB)在 COVID-19 疫情期间拥有最高的权力/影响力。只有两个利益攸关方(6.06%)的参与度高,18.18%的参与度中等。除 NHCC 和 MoH 外,所有利益攸关方都缺乏对该主题的适当了解。此外,只有三个利益攸关方(9.09%)拥有高权力/影响力。

结论

鉴于 COVID-19 的多维度性质,大多数机构和组织都参与了管理这一大流行病。权力/权威和资源高的利益攸关方的参与度低/中等,支持度中等。此外,支持度高和参与度高的组织拥有应对 COVID-19 的低权力/权威和资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc07/9563820/8bda8870c684/12889_2022_14219_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc07/9563820/8bda8870c684/12889_2022_14219_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc07/9563820/8bda8870c684/12889_2022_14219_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholders analysis of COVID-19 management and control: a case of Iran.新冠疫情管理和控制的利益相关者分析:以伊朗为例。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):1909. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14219-0.
2
HIV/AIDS policy-making in Iran: A stakeholder analysis.伊朗的艾滋病毒/艾滋病政策制定:利益相关者分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Nov;36(6):2351-2365. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3313. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
3
Financing of physical rehabilitation services in Iran: a stakeholder and social network analysis.伊朗物理康复服务的融资:利益相关者和社会网络分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05447-4.
4
Stakeholder analysis of childhood obesity prevention policies in Iran.伊朗儿童肥胖预防政策的利益相关者分析
Arch Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;79(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00557-9.
5
Hepatitis C virus-related policy-making in Iran: a stakeholder and social network analysis.伊朗丙型肝炎病毒相关政策制定:利益相关者和社会网络分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 16;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0442-1.
6
Pharmaceutical subsidy policy in Iran: a qualitative stakeholder analysis.伊朗的药品补贴政策:利益相关者定性分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00762-6.
7
Eliminating Healthcare-Associated Infections in Iran: A Qualitative Study to Explore Stakeholders' Views.消除伊朗的医源性感染:一项定性研究,旨在探讨利益相关者的观点。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jan 1;7(1):27-34. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.34.
8
Explaining the role and responsibilities of the National Anti-Coronavirus Headquarters in prevention and emergency response to pandemics in the workplace: a qualitative study on COVID-19 experience in Iran.解释国家冠状病毒总部在工作场所预防和应对大流行病方面的作用和责任:伊朗 COVID-19 经验的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09148-6.
9
COVID-19 Data Utilization in North Carolina: Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Experiences.北卡罗来纳州的 COVID-19 数据利用:利益相关者经验的定性分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Sep 2;7(9):e29310. doi: 10.2196/29310.
10
A stakeholder analysis to prepare for real-world evaluation of integrating artificial intelligent algorithms into breast screening (PREP-AIR study): a qualitative study using the WHO guide.一项为将人工智能算法整合到乳腺筛查的真实世界评估做准备的利益相关者分析(PREP-AIR研究):一项使用世界卫生组织指南的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 2;24(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10926-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The COVID-19 Vaccination Rollout in Tanzania: The Role of Coordination in Its Success.坦桑尼亚的新冠疫苗接种推广:协调在其成功中的作用。
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;13(5):484. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050484.
2
Ethical Healthcare During Public Health Emergencies: A Focus on Non-COVID-19 Patients.公共卫生紧急事件期间的伦理医疗:聚焦非新冠患者
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Nov 13;17:2803-2810. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S485356. eCollection 2024.
3
"What's up with price controls?" Stakeholders' views on the regulation of pharmaceutical pricing in Malaysia.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Health, Burnout, and Job Stressors Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Survey.伊朗新冠疫情期间医护人员的心理健康、职业倦怠与工作压力源:一项横断面调查
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 12;13:891430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891430. eCollection 2022.
2
Identifying the non-governmental organizations' activities and challenges in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.识别伊朗非政府组织应对 COVID-19 大流行的活动和挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13080-5.
3
Stuck in neutral? Federalism, policy instruments, and counter-cyclical responses to COVID-19 in the United States.
“价格管制是怎么回事?”马来西亚药品定价监管的利益相关者观点。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0291031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291031. eCollection 2023.
4
Suicidal ideation, burnout, and their correlation among health care workers at the end of the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Alborz Province, Iran.伊朗阿尔伯兹省新冠疫情第四波末期医护人员的自杀意念、职业倦怠及其相关性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 13;14:1261105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1261105. eCollection 2023.
5
Time-series COVID-19 policymaker analysis of the UAE, Taiwan, New Zealand, Japan and Hungary.阿联酋、台湾地区、新西兰、日本和匈牙利新冠肺炎政策制定者的时间序列分析。 需要说明的是,台湾是中国的省级行政区,不是一个国家,应避免使用错误表述。
Dialogues Health. 2022 Dec;1:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100081. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
陷入僵局?美国的联邦制、政策工具与对新冠疫情的反周期应对措施
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 24;39(3):458-477. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783793. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Trust, but customize: federalism's impact on the Canadian COVID-19 response.信任,但需因地制宜:联邦制对加拿大应对新冠疫情的影响
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 19;39(3):382-402. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783788. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Policy style, consistency and the effectiveness of the policy mix in China's fight against COVID-19.中国抗击新冠疫情中的政策风格、一致性及政策组合的有效性
Policy Soc. 2020 Jun 30;39(3):309-325. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787627. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Chronic Pediatric Pain and Mental Illness During the COVID-19 Era: A Case Series From Inpatient Child Psychiatry Unit.新冠疫情时代的儿童慢性疼痛与精神疾病:来自儿童精神科住院部的病例系列
Cureus. 2021 Nov 30;13(11):e20032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20032. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Physician Suicide in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情时代的医生自杀问题
Cureus. 2021 Nov 6;13(11):e19313. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19313. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Implementing COVID-19 surveillance through inter-organizational coordination: a qualitative study of three cities in Colombia.通过组织间协调实施 COVID-19 监测:哥伦比亚三个城市的定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Feb 8;37(2):232-242. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab145.
9
Efficiency in the governance of the Covid-19 pandemic: political and territorial factors.新冠疫情治理中的效率:政治和地域因素
Global Health. 2021 Sep 21;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00759-4.
10
The COVID-19 outbreak in Sri Lanka: A synoptic analysis focusing on trends, impacts, risks and science-policy interaction processes.斯里兰卡的新冠疫情:一项聚焦趋势、影响、风险及科学-政策互动过程的概要分析。
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Dec;8:100133. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100133. Epub 2020 Nov 11.