Tao Qin, Jiang Lin, Li Fali, Qiu Yuan, Yi Chanlin, Si Yajing, Li Cunbo, Zhang Tao, Yao Dezhong, Xu Peng
MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731 China.
School of Life Science and Technology, Center for Information in Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731 China.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Oct;16(5):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09753-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
P300 as an effective biomarker to index attention and memory has been widely used for brain-computer interface, cognitive evaluation, and clinical diagnosis. To evoke clear P300, an oddball paradigm consisting of two types of stimuli, i.e., infrequent target stimuli and frequent standard stimuli, is usually used. However, to simply and quickly explore the P300-related process, previous studies predominately focused on the target condition but ignored the fusion of target and standard conditions, as well as the difference of brain networks between them. Therefore, in this study, we used the hidden Markov model to investigate the fused multi-conditional electroencephalogram dataset of P300, aiming to effectively identify the underlying brain networks and explore the difference between conditions. Specifically, the inferred networks, including their transition sequences and spatial distributions, were scrutinized first. Then, we found that the difference between target and standard conditions was mainly concentrated in two phases. One was the stimulation phase that mainly related to the cortical activities of the postcentral gyrus and superior parietal lobule, and the other corresponded to the response phase that involved the activities of superior and medial frontal gyri. This might be attributed to distinct cognitive functions, as the stimulation phase is associated with visual information integration whereas the response phase involves stimulus discrimination and behavior control. Taken together, the current work explored dynamic networks underlying the P300-related process and provided a complementary understanding of distinct P300 conditions, which may contribute to the design of P300-related brain-machine systems.
P300作为一种用于指示注意力和记忆的有效生物标志物,已被广泛应用于脑机接口、认知评估和临床诊断。为了诱发清晰的P300,通常采用由两种类型的刺激组成的oddball范式,即不频繁的目标刺激和频繁的标准刺激。然而,为了简单快速地探索与P300相关的过程,以往的研究主要集中在目标条件上,而忽略了目标条件和标准条件的融合以及它们之间脑网络的差异。因此,在本研究中,我们使用隐马尔可夫模型来研究P300的融合多条件脑电图数据集,旨在有效识别潜在的脑网络并探索不同条件之间的差异。具体而言,首先仔细研究推断出的网络,包括它们的转换序列和空间分布。然后,我们发现目标条件和标准条件之间的差异主要集中在两个阶段。一个是刺激阶段,主要与中央后回和顶上小叶的皮质活动有关,另一个对应于反应阶段,涉及额上回和额中回的活动。这可能归因于不同的认知功能,因为刺激阶段与视觉信息整合相关,而反应阶段涉及刺激辨别和行为控制。综上所述,当前的工作探索了与P300相关过程的动态网络,并对不同的P300条件提供了补充理解,这可能有助于与P300相关的脑机系统的设计。