Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, New South Wales 2350, Australia.
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2022 Dec 1;100(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac341.
Ducks will access water to maintain feather condition and exhibit natural water-related behaviors such as wet preening. Providing water to ducks commercially is challenging as it may reduce litter and air quality leading to higher duck mortality or illness. This research aimed to measure the behavioral and welfare impacts of water provision via a misting system for commercial Pekin grower ducks in Victoria, Australia. Seven grower flocks were observed (four misted and three nonmisted in open-sided sheds) during May and November 2021. From 26 until 33 d of age, treatment ducks were provided 1 h of misting with shed curtains closed in both treatment and control sheds. At the start and end of the misting application period, external health and welfare measures were taken directly on the ducks via transect walks throughout each shed and catch-and-inspect observations on a sample of 150 ducks from each shed. Video recordings were also made of the misted and nonmisted ducks for 3 h representing time periods prior to, during, and after the 1-h misting across all sheds for all 8 d of the treatment period. Observations were made of all behavior that ducks exhibited at 10-min scan sample intervals across four cameras per shed, totaling 4,198 scans across the seven sheds. General linear mixed models showed the misting application predominantly had impacts on the patterns of behavioral change across the treatment time periods between the misted and nonmisted ducks rather than increasing or decreasing the overall expression of specific behaviors (interaction terms all P ≤ 0.003). The misted ducks increased drinking, tail wagging, and walking, and reduced preening, rooting litter, sitting, and stretching during misting relative to what they showed prior. The nonmisted ducks showed less sitting and more panting during misting relative to prior. Pearson's Chi-square tests showed some differences between the treatment groups in feather cleanliness on the back and wings (both P < 0.0001), likely resulting from pre-existing differences between sheds in blood from pin feathers. Most welfare indicators showed no positive or negative effect of the misting treatment. These results indicate overhead misting does affect duck behavior to some degree without compromising their welfare, but further research with larger water droplet sizes resulting in greater accumulation of surface water or extended durations of misting may lead to greater effects.
鸭子需要接触水来保持羽毛的状态,并表现出自然的与水相关的行为,如湿理羽。商业上给鸭子供水具有挑战性,因为这可能会降低垫料和空气质量,导致更高的死亡率或疾病。本研究旨在通过在澳大利亚维多利亚州的商业北京鸭饲养场中使用喷雾系统来测量供水对行为和福利的影响。在 2021 年 5 月和 11 月,观察了七个饲养场(四个喷雾处理和三个非喷雾开放式饲养场)。在 26 至 33 日龄时,处理组鸭子在两个处理和对照饲养场关闭棚帘的情况下喷雾 1 小时。在喷雾应用开始和结束时,通过对每个饲养场进行的横切步行以及对每个饲养场 150 只鸭子的抽样进行捕捉和检查观察,直接对鸭子进行外部健康和福利措施。还对喷雾和非喷雾鸭子进行了 3 小时的视频记录,代表所有饲养场在处理期的 8 天内,在喷雾前、喷雾中和喷雾后,跨越所有饲养场的 1 小时喷雾时间。在四个摄像机每饲养场 10 分钟扫描样本间隔观察鸭子的所有行为,在七个饲养场共记录了 4198 次扫描。一般线性混合模型表明,喷雾应用主要影响喷雾和非喷雾鸭子在处理期间行为变化的模式,而不是增加或减少特定行为的总体表达(互作项 P 均≤0.003)。与喷雾前相比,喷雾后的鸭子增加了饮水、摇尾和行走,减少了理羽、翻找垫料、坐卧和伸展。喷雾时,非喷雾鸭子的坐卧减少,喘气增加。Pearson 卡方检验表明,在背部和翅膀的羽毛清洁度方面,处理组之间存在一些差异(均 P<0.0001),这可能是由于棚舍之间来自刚毛的血液差异造成的。大多数福利指标显示喷雾处理没有产生积极或消极影响。这些结果表明,喷雾在一定程度上确实会影响鸭子的行为,而不会损害它们的福利,但进一步的研究可能需要使用更大的水滴大小,导致更多的表面水积累或延长喷雾持续时间,可能会产生更大的影响。