Suppr超能文献

积极控制术中体温对高危胸腔镜手术患者术后急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分及预后的影响。

The effect of aggressive management of intraoperative body temperature on postoperative APACHE II score and prognosis in high-risk patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

作者信息

Li Wangyu, Hu Zhouting, Liu Jiayan, Yuan Yuxin, Li Kai

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2022 Sep;14(9):3429-3437. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-873.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative hypothermia is related with postoperative complication, longer length of stay (LoS) and mortality. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) it the most commonly used evaluation system for assessing the severity and clinical prognosis of patients. This study sought to examine the effect of intraoperative body temperature on postoperative APACHE II scores and the prognosis of high-risk patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

This study used the clinical data of patients from a multicenter randomized controlled trial who had undergone thoracoscopic surgery at our center (NCT03111875). In our center were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either aggressive warming to a target core temperature of 37 ℃ or routine thermal management to a target of 35.5 ℃ during non-cardiac surgery. Randomisation was computer-generated. Eligible patients (aged ≥45 years) had at least one cardiovascular risk factor, were scheduled for inpatient noncardiac surgery expected to last 2-6 h with general anaesthesia. We retrieved medical information through the electronic medical record system. The primary outcome was the postoperative APACHE II scores, APACHE II score variation. The secondary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, LoS in hospital, postoperative complications, infections, and deaths of the patients were recorded, and a logistic regression analysis was conducted to stratify the risk factors for the APACHE II score.

RESULTS

Group R comprised 121 patients and Group A comprised 84 patients. Group A had lower postoperative APACHE II scores (P=0.046) and a lower probability of a grade increase than Group R (P=0.005). However, no significant differences were found in terms of the QoR-15 scores, LoS, postoperative complications, infections, and deaths between the 2 groups. The logistic regression showed that aggressive warming, age, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were risk factors for the deterioration of postoperative APACHE II scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The active adoption of various passive and aggressive warming strategies to keep the core body temperature ≥37 ℃ during thoracoscopic surgery significantly reduced increases in APACHE II scores, which is different from age and ASA grade, and was the only intervention factor.

摘要

背景

术中低体温与术后并发症、更长的住院时间(LoS)及死亡率相关。急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)是评估患者严重程度和临床预后最常用的评估系统。本研究旨在探讨术中体温对术后APACHE II评分及接受胸腔镜手术的高危患者预后的影响。

方法

本研究使用了来自一项多中心随机对照试验的患者临床数据,这些患者在我们中心接受了胸腔镜手术(NCT03111875)。在我们中心,非心脏手术期间,患者被随机分配(1:1)接受积极升温至目标核心体温37℃或常规体温管理至目标体温35.5℃。随机分组由计算机生成。符合条件的患者(年龄≥45岁)至少有一项心血管危险因素,计划接受预计持续2 - 6小时的住院非心脏手术并采用全身麻醉。我们通过电子病历系统检索医疗信息。主要结局是术后APACHE II评分、APACHE II评分变化。次要结局是术后恢复质量-15(QoR-15)评分、住院时间、记录患者的术后并发症、感染及死亡情况,并进行逻辑回归分析以分层分析APACHE II评分的危险因素。

结果

R组有121例患者,A组有84例患者。A组术后APACHE II评分较低(P = 0.046),且评分升高的概率低于R组(P = 0.005)。然而,两组在QoR-15评分、住院时间、术后并发症、感染及死亡方面未发现显著差异。逻辑回归分析显示,积极升温、年龄及美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级是术后APACHE II评分恶化的危险因素。

结论

在胸腔镜手术期间积极采用各种被动和主动升温策略使核心体温≥37℃,可显著降低APACHE II评分的升高,这与年龄和ASA分级不同,是唯一的干预因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dbc/9562553/94c53229c45e/jtd-14-09-3429-f1.jpg

相似文献

3
[Risk factors for death in elderly patients admitted to intensive care unit after elective abdominal surgery: a consecutive 5-year retrospective study].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Dec;33(12):1453-1458. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210804-00118.
4
Perioperative Risk Stratification: A Need for an Improved Assessment in Surgery and Anesthesia-A Pilot Study.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Oct 19;57(10):1132. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101132.
9
Decisions to operate: the ASA grade 5 dilemma.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Jul;93(5):365-9. doi: 10.1308/003588411X581367.
10
Difficulties in predicting outcome in cardiac surgery patients.
Crit Care Med. 1995 Nov;23(11):1843-50. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199511000-00010.

本文引用的文献

2
Dynamic APACHE II Score to Predict the Outcome of Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 26;8:744907. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.744907. eCollection 2021.
5
Validation and update of the thoracic surgery scoring system (Thoracoscore) risk model.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 1;58(2):350-356. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa056.
7
APACHE II score validation in emergency abdominal surgery. A post hoc analysis of the InCare trial.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Feb;64(2):180-187. doi: 10.1111/aas.13476. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
9
Intraoperative hypothermia and its clinical outcomes in patients undergoing general anesthesia: National study in China.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0177221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177221. eCollection 2017.
10
Active body surface warming systems for preventing complications caused by inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 21;4(4):CD009016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009016.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验