• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于CIPP模型和层次分析法-模糊综合评价法的高等教育创业教育质量评价

Quality evaluation of entrepreneurship education in higher education based on CIPP model and AHP-FCE methods.

作者信息

Fan Xinqiao, Tian Siyu, Lu Zhenglan, Cao Yirong

机构信息

Hangzhou Vocational and Technical College, Hangzhou, China.

College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 30;13:973511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973511. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973511
PMID:36248484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9563852/
Abstract

Entrepreneurship education has become an important component of higher education development. The purpose of this study is to evaluate entrepreneurship education and determine the extent of satisfaction with the education program. Firstly, based on the CIPP model, this article theoretically analyzes the factors affecting the quality of entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities, and clarifies the keys to improve that education quality. On this basis, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method, the evaluation index system and fuzzy evaluation model of entrepreneurial education are established. The results show that student participation is the most important factor affecting the quality of entrepreneurship education. Empirical analysis indicates that students have the highest satisfaction with teachers and the lowest satisfaction with the entrepreneurial environment. Apart from convenient and effective measurement of entrepreneurship education, the proposed model provides an important reference for improving the quality of entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities.

摘要

创业教育已成为高等教育发展的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是评估创业教育,并确定对该教育项目的满意程度。首先,基于CIPP模型,本文从理论上分析了影响高校创业教育质量的因素,并明确了提高该教育质量的关键。在此基础上,运用层次分析法(AHP)和模糊综合评价(FCE)方法,建立了创业教育评价指标体系和模糊评价模型。结果表明,学生参与是影响创业教育质量的最重要因素。实证分析表明,学生对教师的满意度最高,对创业环境的满意度最低。除了能方便有效地衡量创业教育外,所提出的模型为提高高校创业教育质量提供了重要参考。

相似文献

1
Quality evaluation of entrepreneurship education in higher education based on CIPP model and AHP-FCE methods.基于CIPP模型和层次分析法-模糊综合评价法的高等教育创业教育质量评价
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 30;13:973511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973511. eCollection 2022.
2
How Entrepreneurship Education at Universities Influences Entrepreneurial Intention: Mediating Effect Based on Entrepreneurial Competence.大学创业教育如何影响创业意向:基于创业能力的中介效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 6;12:655868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655868. eCollection 2021.
3
Are the Teachers and Students Satisfied: Sustainable Development Mode of Entrepreneurship Education in Chinese Universities?师生是否满意:中国高校创业教育的可持续发展模式?
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 21;11:1738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01738. eCollection 2020.
4
The Effects of Institution-Driven Entrepreneurial Education in Chinese Universities: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach.中国高校中制度驱动型创业教育的影响:一种定性比较分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 22;12:719476. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719476. eCollection 2021.
5
Entrepreneurship Education, Psychological Cognition, and Entrepreneurship Activities: An Analysis Based on a Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.创业教育、心理认知与创业活动:基于模糊集定性比较分析的研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 28;12:733319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733319. eCollection 2021.
6
The Impact of Young Entrepreneurs' Network Entrepreneurship Education and Management System Innovation on Students' Entrepreneurial Psychology.青年创业者网络创业教育与管理体系创新对学生创业心理的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 10;12:731317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731317. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploration on the Cultivation of Undergraduates' Entrepreneurship Ability from the Perspective of Mental Health Education.从心理健康教育角度探索大学生创业能力的培养
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 16;2022:9668220. doi: 10.1155/2022/9668220. eCollection 2022.
8
How to Develop Entrepreneurial Talent More Effectively? A Comparison of Different Entrepreneurship Educational Methods.如何更有效地培养创业人才?不同创业教育方法的比较。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 15;12:644113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644113. eCollection 2021.
9
The Analysis of Integration of Ideological Political Education With Innovation Entrepreneurship Education for College Students.大学生思想政治教育与创新创业教育融合分析
Front Psychol. 2021 May 5;12:610409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610409. eCollection 2021.
10
Analysis on the Moderating Effect of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Mode and Locus of Control of College Teachers and Students Based on Comic Style Recognition.基于漫画风格认知的创新创业教育模式及高校师生控制点的调节效应分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 16;13:843665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.843665. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of the medical virtual teaching and research office evaluation system in China based on the context, input, process, product model: a Delphi study.基于“情境-投入-过程-产出”模型构建我国医学虚拟教研室评价体系的德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):1322. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06312-2.
2
How entrepreneurship education affects college students' entrepreneurial intention: Samples from China.创业教育如何影响大学生的创业意向:来自中国的样本
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e30776. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30776. eCollection 2024 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the quality of simulation teaching in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum: AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.基础护理学课程模拟教学质量评价:层次分析法-模糊综合评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jun;77:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
2
Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment.水质评价模糊综合评价中评价指标权重确定的熵权法
J Environ Sci (China). 2006;18(5):1020-3. doi: 10.1016/s1001-0742(06)60032-6.
3
The discipline of innovation.
Harv Bus Rev. 1985 May-Jun;63(3):67-72.