Suppr超能文献

电动助力自行车对身体活动及交通事故风险的影响:一项前瞻性观察性研究。

Impact of electrically assisted bicycles on physical activity and traffic accident risk: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Haufe Sven, Boeck Hedwig Theda, Häckl Sebastian, Boyen Johanna, Kück Momme, van Rhee Clara Catharina, Graf von der Schulenburg Johann-Matthias, Zeidler Jan, Schmidt Torben, Johannsen Heiko, Holzwart Dennis, Koch Armin, Tegtbur Uwe

机构信息

Institute of Sports Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Institute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 Sep 12;8(4):e001275. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001275. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have become increasingly popular and may facilitate active commuting and recreational cycling.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the physical activity levels and usage characteristics of e-bikers and conventional cyclists under real-world conditions.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in Germany to examine the effects of e-biking compared with conventional cycling on reaching the World Health Organization (WHO) target for physical activity-at least 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week. Study participants (1250 e-bikers and 629 conventional bike users) were equipped with activity trackers to assess the time, distance and heart rate during cycling over four consecutive weeks. Questionnaires were used to assess any traffic accidents incurred over 12 months.

RESULTS

The proportion of participants reaching 150 min of MVPA per week was higher for conventional bike users than for e-bike users (35.0% vs 22.4%, p<0.001). In a multiple regression model, the odds of reaching the physical activity target were lower for e-biking than for conventional biking (OR=0.56; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.72) with age, sex, comorbidities and bike usage patterns as confounding factors. No significant differences were observed between bike groups for traffic accidents, yet when controlled for cycling time and frequency of cycling e-bikers had a higher risk of a traffic accident (OR=1.63; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.58).

CONCLUSION

E-bikes are associated with a lower probability of reaching WHO targets for MVPA due to reduced duration and a reduced cardiovascular effort during riding. However, e-bikes might facilitate active transportation, particularly in older individuals or those with pre-existing conditions.

摘要

背景

电动助力自行车(电动自行车)越来越受欢迎,可能有助于积极通勤和休闲骑行。

目的

评估电动自行车骑行者和传统自行车骑行者在实际情况下的身体活动水平和使用特征。

方法

我们在德国进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,以检验与传统骑行相比,电动骑行对达到世界卫生组织(WHO)身体活动目标的影响,即每周至少150分钟的中等至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)。研究参与者(1250名电动自行车骑行者和629名传统自行车使用者)配备了活动追踪器,以评估连续四周骑行期间的时间、距离和心率。通过问卷调查评估12个月内发生的任何交通事故。

结果

传统自行车使用者每周达到150分钟MVPA的参与者比例高于电动自行车使用者(35.0%对22.4%,p<0.001)。在多元回归模型中,将年龄、性别、合并症和自行车使用模式作为混杂因素,电动骑行达到身体活动目标的几率低于传统骑行(OR=0.56;95%CI 0.43至0.72)。两组自行车使用者在交通事故方面未观察到显著差异,但在控制骑行时间和骑行频率后,电动自行车骑行者发生交通事故的风险更高(OR=1.63;95%CI 1.02至2.58)。

结论

电动自行车由于骑行时间缩短和心血管负荷降低,达到WHO的MVPA目标的可能性较低。然而,电动自行车可能有助于积极的交通方式,特别是在老年人或已有疾病的人群中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdbf/9558802/65ed4f183b24/bmjsem-2021-001275f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验