Ramia Gaby, Mitchell Emma, Morris Alan, Wilson Shaun, Hastings Catherine, Davies Jake
The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
High Educ Policy. 2022 Oct 8:1-19. doi: 10.1057/s41307-022-00288-8.
Housing is a major concern for many international students. This is especially so in those countries where students are mostly dependent on the private market for their accommodation. Australia is one such country, and is one of the world's major destinations for international students. This article analyses governmental failure to address problems relating to international student housing affordability and conditions. Using theory on 'policy inaction' to frame the analysis, we draw on 20 interviews with policy stakeholders to explain the Australian government's reliance on: (1) market-based housing provision for international students, and (2) a longstanding policy preference not to provide support. Interviewees were widely critical of the lack of action to address international student housing problems and understood inaction in relation, rather than in opposition, to the dominance of market-based action in housing and higher education. However, analysis of stakeholder perspectives also illuminates how policy-making benefiting some emerges as for others left behind or overlooked by the status quo. The interview data points to the need for government to overhaul its policy framework, and in doing so, to collaborate with higher education providers in revising the market-based regulatory approach. The main implications for theory and policy are discussed.
住房问题是许多国际学生主要关心的事情。在那些学生大多依赖私人市场提供住宿的国家,情况尤其如此。澳大利亚就是这样一个国家,也是世界主要的国际学生目的地之一。本文分析了政府在解决国际学生住房可负担性和住房条件相关问题上的不作为。运用“政策不作为”理论来构建分析框架,我们通过对20位政策利益相关者的访谈来解释澳大利亚政府依赖:(1)为国际学生提供基于市场的住房;(2)长期以来不提供支持的政策偏好。受访者普遍批评政府在解决国际学生住房问题上缺乏行动,并且认为这种不作为与住房和高等教育中基于市场的行动占主导地位有关,而非对立关系。然而,对利益相关者观点的分析也揭示了有利于某些人的政策制定是如何使其他人被现状抛在后面或忽视的。访谈数据表明政府有必要彻底改革其政策框架,并且在这样做的过程中,与高等教育提供者合作修订基于市场的监管方法。文中还讨论了这对理论和政策的主要影响。