Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3DB, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 25;119(43):e2109324119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109324119. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Despite the vast array of different geochronological tools available, dating the Paleolithic remains one of the discipline's greatest challenges. This review focuses on two different dating approaches: trapped charge and amino acid geochronology. While differing in their fundamental principles, both exploit time-dependent changes in signals found within crystals to generate a chronology for the material dated and hence, the associated deposits. Within each method, there is a diverse range of signals that can be analyzed, each covering different time ranges, applicable to different materials and suitable for different paleoenvironmental and archaeological contexts. This multiplicity of signals can at first sight appear confusing, but it is a fundamental strength of the techniques, allowing internal checks for consistency and providing more information than simply a chronology. For each technique, we present an overview of the basis for the time-dependent signals and the types of material that can be analyzed, with examples of their archaeological application, as well as their future potential.
尽管有大量不同的地质年代学工具可用,但对旧石器时代的年代测定仍然是该学科最大的挑战之一。这篇综述重点介绍了两种不同的测年方法:捕获电荷和氨基酸地质年代学。虽然这两种方法的基本原理不同,但它们都利用晶体中发现的信号随时间的变化来生成所测材料的年代,并因此生成相关沉积物的年代。在每种方法中,都有多种可以分析的信号,每种信号都覆盖不同的时间范围,适用于不同的材料,适合不同的古环境和考古背景。这种信号的多样性乍一看可能会让人感到困惑,但这是该技术的一个基本优势,它允许进行内部一致性检查,并提供比简单的年代序列更多的信息。对于每种技术,我们都介绍了随时间变化的信号的基础以及可以分析的材料类型,并提供了它们在考古学中的应用实例,以及它们未来的潜力。