Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 18;17(10):e0263861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263861. eCollection 2022.
The currently used SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have proven to induce a strong and protective immune response. However, functional relevance of vaccine-generated antibodies and their temporal progression are still poorly understood. Thus, the central aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of systemic and mucosal humoral immune response after mRNA vaccination with BNT162b2.
We compared antibody production against the S1 subunit and the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in sera of BNT162b2 vaccinees, heterologous ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 vaccinees and COVID-19 patients. We monitored the neutralizing humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 wildtype strain and three VOCs over a period of up to eight months after second and after a subsequent third vaccination.
In comparison to COVID-19 patients, vaccinees showed higher or similar amounts of S1- and RBD-binding antibodies but similar or lower virus neutralizing titers. Antibodies peaked two weeks after the second dose, followed by a decrease three and eight months later. Neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) poorly correlated with S1-IgG levels but strongly with RBD-IgGAM titers. After second vaccination we observed a reduced vaccine-induced neutralizing capacity against VOCs, especially against the Omicron variant. Compared to the nAb levels after the second vaccination, the neutralizing capacity against wildtype strain and VOCs was significantly enhanced after third vaccination. In saliva samples, relevant levels of RBD antibodies were detected in convalescent samples but not in vaccinees.
Our data demonstrate that BNT162b2 vaccinated individuals generate relevant nAbs titers, which begin to decrease within three months after immunization and show lower neutralizing potential against VOCs as compared to the wildtype strain. Large proportion of vaccine-induced S1-IgG might be non-neutralizing whereas RBD-IgGAM appears to be a good surrogate marker to estimate nAb levels. A third vaccination increases the nAb response. Furthermore, the systemic vaccine does not seem to elicit readily detectable mucosal immunity.
目前使用的 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA 疫苗已被证明能诱导强烈且具有保护作用的免疫应答。然而,疫苗产生的抗体的功能相关性及其时间进展仍知之甚少。因此,本研究的主要目的是更好地了解 BNT162b2 mRNA 疫苗接种后的全身和黏膜体液免疫应答。
我们比较了 BNT162b2 疫苗接种者、异源 ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 疫苗接种者和 COVID-19 患者血清中针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 S1 亚单位和 RBD 的抗体产生情况。我们在第二剂和随后的第三剂接种后长达 8 个月的时间内,监测针对 SARS-CoV-2 野生型毒株和三种 VOC 的中和体液免疫应答。
与 COVID-19 患者相比,疫苗接种者表现出更高或相似水平的 S1 和 RBD 结合抗体,但病毒中和滴度相似或更低。抗体在第二剂后两周达到峰值,然后在三个月和八个月后下降。中和抗体(nAb)与 S1-IgG 水平相关性较差,但与 RBD-IgGAM 滴度相关性较强。在第二剂接种后,我们观察到针对 VOC 的疫苗诱导的中和能力下降,尤其是针对奥密克戎变异株。与第二剂接种后的 nAb 水平相比,第三剂接种后对野生型毒株和 VOC 的中和能力显著增强。在唾液样本中,恢复期样本中检测到相关水平的 RBD 抗体,但疫苗接种者中未检测到。
我们的数据表明,BNT162b2 接种者产生了相关的 nAb 滴度,这些滴度在免疫后三个月内开始下降,并且对 VOC 的中和能力低于野生型毒株。大量的疫苗诱导的 S1-IgG 可能是非中和性的,而 RBD-IgGAM 似乎是估计 nAb 水平的良好替代标志物。第三剂接种可增加 nAb 反应。此外,全身疫苗似乎不会引起易于检测的黏膜免疫。