Suppr超能文献

接种疫苗和奥密克戎 BA.1/BA.2 感染恢复期增强了针对 BA.4/5 的系统性但非黏膜免疫。

Vaccination and Omicron BA.1/BA.2 Convalescence Enhance Systemic but Not Mucosal Immunity against BA.4/5.

机构信息

Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0516322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05163-22. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Abstract

Rising breakthrough infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron BA.4/5 led to the performance of various studies investigating systemic immunity and neutralizing antibodies in sera, but mucosal immunity remains understudied. In this cohort study, the humoral immune responses, including immunoglobulin levels and the presence of virus-neutralizing antibodies, of 92 vaccinated and/or BA.1/BA.2 convalescent individuals were investigated. Cohorts received two doses of ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 and subsequent booster vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, following BA.1/BA.2 infection. In addition, vaccinated and nonconvalescent or unvaccinated and BA.1 convalescent individuals were studied. Serum and saliva samples were used to determine SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG and IgA titers and neutralizing activity against replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 wild-type virus and the Omicron BA.4/5 variant. Vaccinated/convalescent cohorts demonstrated strongest neutralization against BA.4/5, with 50% neutralization titer (NT) values reaching 174.2; however, neutralization was reduced up to 11-fold, compared to wild-type virus. Both BA.1 convalescent and vaccinated nonconvalescent cohorts displayed the weakest neutralization against BA.4/5, with NT values being reduced to 4.6, accompanied by lower numbers of positive neutralizers. Additionally, salivary neutralization against wild-type virus was strongest in vaccinated and BA.2 convalescent subjects, but this elevated neutralization efficiency was lost when challenged with BA.4/5. Our data support the contention that current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines efficiently induce humoral immunity. However, antiviral effectiveness in serum and saliva is greatly reduced against novel variants of concern. These results suggest an adjustment of current vaccine strategies to an adapted or alternative vaccine delivery, such as mucosal booster vaccinations, which might establish enhanced or even sterilizing immunity against novel SARS-CoV-2 variants. Rising incidences of breakthrough infections caused by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/5 have been observed. Although various studies were conducted investigating neutralizing antibodies in sera, mucosal immunity was barely evaluated. Here, we investigated mucosal immunity, since the presence of neutralizing antibodies at mucosal entry sites plays a fundamental role in disease limitation. We found strong induction of serum IgG/IgA, salivary IgA, and neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type virus in vaccinated/convalescent subjects but detected 10-fold reduced (albeit positive) serum neutralization against BA.4/5. Interestingly, vaccinated and BA.2 convalescent patients demonstrated the greatest serum neutralization against BA.4/5, but this advantageous neutralizing effect was not observed in the saliva. Our data support the contention that current COVID-19 vaccines are very efficient against severe/critical disease progression. Moreover, these results suggest an adjustment of the current vaccine strategy to adapted and alternative vaccine delivery, such as mucosal booster vaccinations, to establish robust sterilizing immunity against novel SARS-CoV-2 variants.

摘要

奥密克戎 BA.4/5 导致严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 的突破性感染不断增加,促使人们开展了各种研究来调查血清中的系统免疫和中和抗体,但黏膜免疫仍未得到充分研究。在这项队列研究中,研究了 92 名接种过疫苗和/或 BA.1/BA.2 康复的个体的体液免疫反应,包括免疫球蛋白水平和存在病毒中和抗体。接种疫苗和/或康复的队列在 BA.1/BA.2 感染后接受了两剂 ChAdOx1、BNT162b2 或 mRNA-1273,随后接种了 BNT162b2 或 mRNA-1273 作为加强针。此外,还研究了接种疫苗但未康复或未接种疫苗但 BA.1 康复的个体。使用血清和唾液样本来确定针对复制型 SARS-CoV-2 野生型病毒和奥密克戎 BA.4/5 变异株的 SARS-CoV-2 刺突特异性 IgG 和 IgA 滴度和中和活性。接种疫苗/康复队列对 BA.4/5 的中和作用最强,50%中和滴度 (NT) 值达到 174.2;然而,与野生型病毒相比,中和作用降低了 11 倍。BA.1 康复和接种疫苗但未康复的队列对 BA.4/5 的中和作用最弱,NT 值降低至 4.6,同时中和阳性者的数量减少。此外,在接种疫苗和 BA.2 康复的个体中,针对野生型病毒的唾液中和作用最强,但当用 BA.4/5 进行挑战时,这种增强的中和效率就会丧失。我们的数据支持这样一种观点,即当前的 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 疫苗能够有效地诱导体液免疫。然而,针对新的关注变异株,血清和唾液中的抗病毒效力大大降低。这些结果表明,需要调整当前的疫苗策略,采用改良或替代的疫苗接种方法,如黏膜加强针,以建立针对新型 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的增强或甚至杀菌免疫。

奥密克戎 BA.4/5 导致 SARS-CoV-2 的突破性感染不断增加。虽然进行了各种研究来调查血清中的中和抗体,但黏膜免疫几乎没有得到评估。在这里,我们研究了黏膜免疫,因为在黏膜进入部位存在中和抗体在疾病限制中起着至关重要的作用。我们发现接种疫苗和康复的个体中诱导了强烈的血清 IgG/IgA、唾液 IgA 和针对 SARS-CoV-2 野生型病毒的中和作用,但针对 BA.4/5 的血清中和作用降低了 10 倍(尽管仍为阳性)。有趣的是,接种疫苗和 BA.2 康复的患者对 BA.4/5 表现出最大的血清中和作用,但这种有利的中和效应在唾液中没有观察到。我们的数据支持这样一种观点,即当前的 COVID-19 疫苗对严重/危重症疾病进展非常有效。此外,这些结果表明需要调整当前的疫苗策略,采用改良或替代的疫苗接种方法,如黏膜加强针,以建立针对新型 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的强大杀菌免疫。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0227/10269517/0227a51a76c0/spectrum.05163-22-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验