• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功血管内治疗后早期神经改善失败的预测因素比较:来自 ANGEL-ACT 登记研究的数据。

Comparison of predictors of failure of early neurological improvement after successful endovascular treatment for posterior and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of GuangZhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct;30(5):625-636. doi: 10.1177/15910199221133164. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1177/15910199221133164
PMID:36266940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569470/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify and compare the predictors of failure of early neurological improvement (fENI)after successful EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) and posterior circulation LVO (PCLVO).

METHODS

Subjects were selected from the ANGEL-ACT registry. fENI was defined as unchanged or worsened in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) between admission and 24 h after EVT. Predictors of fENI after successful EVT (mTICI 2b-3) were determined via center-adjusted analyses. Univariable and multivariable comparisons between ACLVO and PCLVO were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1447 patients, 1128 were with ACLVO, and 319 were with PCLVO. Among the patients with ACLVO, there were 409 patients (36.3%) with fENI and 719 patients (63.7%) with ENI. We observed that pre-stroke mRS scale score of 2 (odd ratio[OR] 95% confidence interval[CI], 6.93[1.99-24.10], P = 0.002), initial NIHSS score (OR per point[95%CI], 0.97[0.95-0.99], P = 0.012), diabetes (OR[95%CI], 1.56[1.08-2.25], P = 0.017), previous ICH (OR[95%CI] 9.21[1.76-48.15], P = 0.008), local anesthesia (OR[95%CI] 1.63[1.10-2.42], P = 0.014), onset-to-puncture time (OR[95%CI], 1.001[1.000-1.001], P = 0.009), symptomatic ICH (OR[95%CI] 3.90[2.27-6.69], P < 0.001), and continued use of tirofiban within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 0.69[0.51-0.93], P = 0.014) were independent predictors of fENI of ACLVO after EVT. Among the patients with PCLVO, there were 112 patients (35.1%) with fENI and 207 patients (64.9%) with ENI. In contrast, admission SBP (OR[95%CI], 0.98[0.97-0.99], P = 0.012), and vascular dissection within 2 h after EVT (OR[95%CI], 7.23[1.33-39.13], P = 0.022) were independent predictors of fENI of PCLVO after EVT.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, successful EVT can lead to similar outcomes in PCLVO and ACLVO. Some predictors of fENI in both anterior circulation and posterior circulation were identified in our study, which should be highly considered in the clinical practice in LVO patients undergoing EVT.

摘要

目的

识别并比较成功血管内治疗(EVT)后前循环大血管闭塞(ACLVO)和后循环大血管闭塞(PCLVO)患者早期神经功能改善失败(fENI)的预测因素。

方法

从 ANGEL-ACT 登记处选择受试者。fENI 定义为 EVT 后 24 小时内入院和 NIHSS 评分之间无变化或恶化。通过中心调整分析确定成功 EVT(mTICI 2b-3)后的 fENI 预测因素。对 ACLVO 和 PCLVO 进行单变量和多变量比较。

结果

共纳入 1447 例患者,其中 1128 例为 ACLVO,319 例为 PCLVO。在 ACLVO 患者中,有 409 例(36.3%)发生 fENI,719 例(63.7%)发生 ENI。我们观察到,术前 mRS 评分 2 分(比值比[OR]95%置信区间[CI],6.93[1.99-24.10],P=0.002)、初始 NIHSS 评分(每分 OR[95%CI],0.97[0.95-0.99],P=0.012)、糖尿病(OR[95%CI],1.56[1.08-2.25],P=0.017)、既往 ICH(OR[95%CI]9.21[1.76-48.15],P=0.008)、局部麻醉(OR[95%CI]1.63[1.10-2.42],P=0.014)、发病至穿刺时间(OR[95%CI],1.001[1.000-1.001],P=0.009)、症状性 ICH(OR[95%CI]3.90[2.27-6.69],P<0.001)和 EVT 后 2 小时内继续使用替罗非班(OR[95%CI]0.69[0.51-0.93],P=0.014)是 ACLVO 患者 EVT 后 fENI 的独立预测因素。在 PCLVO 患者中,有 112 例(35.1%)发生 fENI,207 例(64.9%)发生 ENI。相比之下,入院时 SBP(OR[95%CI]0.98[0.97-0.99],P=0.012)和 EVT 后 2 小时内血管夹层(OR[95%CI]7.23[1.33-39.13],P=0.022)是 PCLVO 患者 EVT 后 fENI 的独立预测因素。

结论

在选择的患者中,成功的 EVT 可以在前循环和后循环中产生相似的结果。我们的研究确定了前后循环中 fENI 的一些预测因素,在接受 EVT 的 LVO 患者的临床实践中应高度考虑这些因素。

相似文献

1
Comparison of predictors of failure of early neurological improvement after successful endovascular treatment for posterior and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry.成功血管内治疗后早期神经改善失败的预测因素比较:来自 ANGEL-ACT 登记研究的数据。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct;30(5):625-636. doi: 10.1177/15910199221133164. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
2
Comparison of Risk Factors, Safety, and Efficacy Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Posterior vs. Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.后循环与前循环大血管闭塞机械取栓的危险因素、安全性及疗效结果比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 22;12:687134. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.687134. eCollection 2021.
3
Futile reperfusion of endovascular treatment for acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in the ANGEL-ACT registry.ANGEL-ACT 登记研究中急性前循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗的无效再灌注。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Dec 21;15(e3):e363-e368. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019874.
4
Delayed neurological improvement after endovascular treatment for acute large vessel occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT registry.血管内治疗急性大血管闭塞后神经功能改善延迟:ANGEL-ACT 登记研究的数据。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Jan;55(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02712-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Predictors of failure of early neurological improvement in early time window following endovascular thrombectomy: a multi-center study.血管内血栓切除术早期时间窗内早期神经功能改善失败的预测因素:一项多中心研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Sep 14;14:1227825. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1227825. eCollection 2023.
6
Unexplained early neurological deterioration after endovascular treatment for acute large vessel occlusion: incidence, predictors, and clinical impact: Data from ANGEL-ACT registry.急性大血管闭塞血管内治疗后不明原因的早期神经功能恶化:发生率、预测因素和临床影响:来自 ANGEL-ACT 登记研究的数据。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):875-880. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017956. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Predictors for Failure of Early Neurological Improvement After Successful Thrombectomy in the Anterior Circulation.血管内治疗成功后前循环早期神经功能改善失败的预测因素。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1291-1298. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030519. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Predictors of Good Outcomes in Patients with Failed Endovascular Thrombectomy.血管内血栓切除术失败患者的良好预后预测因素。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 May;21(5):582-587. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0578.
9
Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke.血管内治疗急性缺血性卒中后无效再通的预测因素。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03719-8.
10
Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion in China: A Real-World Nationwide Registry.中国急性大血管闭塞血管内治疗的现状:一项真实世界的全国登记研究。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1203-1212. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031869. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients with ideal reperfusion: A cohort study of LAA and CE subgroups.替罗非班在实现理想再灌注的急性缺血性卒中患者中的疗效和安全性:LAA和CE亚组的队列研究
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e70034. doi: 10.1111/ene.70034.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban vs Placebo Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: The RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内血栓切除术治疗前静脉注射替罗非班与安慰剂对大血管闭塞性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:RESCUE BT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):543-553. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12584.
2
Plasma Lipid Mediators Associate With Clinical Outcome After Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗成功后,血浆脂质介质与临床预后相关。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 4;13:917974. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.917974. eCollection 2022.
3
Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.血管内治疗后急性缺血性脑卒中无效再通的预测因素:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):881-885. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017963. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Low-dose tirofiban is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in cardioembolic stroke patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy.低剂量替罗非班与血管内血栓切除术治疗心源性脑栓塞患者的住院死亡率降低相关。
J Neurol Sci. 2021 Aug 15;427:117539. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117539. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Conscious sedation compared to general anesthesia for intracranial mechanical thrombectomy: A meta-analysis.颅内机械取栓术中清醒镇静与全身麻醉的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2021 Jun;11(6):e02161. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2161. Epub 2021 May 7.
6
Safety and efficacy of intensive blood pressure lowering after successful endovascular therapy in acute ischaemic stroke (BP-TARGET): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.成功血管内治疗急性缺血性卒中后强化降压的安全性和有效性(BP-TARGET):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Apr;20(4):265-274. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30483-X. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Artery Atherosclerosis Stroke Etiology Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.替罗非班用于大动脉粥样硬化性卒中病因的急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗的安全性和有效性
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 11;12:630301. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.630301. eCollection 2021.
8
Predictors for Failure of Early Neurological Improvement After Successful Thrombectomy in the Anterior Circulation.血管内治疗成功后前循环早期神经功能改善失败的预测因素。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1291-1298. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030519. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
General Anesthesia versus Conscious Sedation in Mechanical Thrombectomy.机械取栓术中全身麻醉与清醒镇静的比较
J Stroke. 2021 Jan;23(1):103-112. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.02404. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
10
Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion in China: A Real-World Nationwide Registry.中国急性大血管闭塞血管内治疗的现状:一项真实世界的全国登记研究。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1203-1212. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031869. Epub 2021 Feb 18.