Suppr超能文献

蜂胶和生物活性玻璃对脱落乳牙干细胞的生物诱导和抗炎特性

Bioinductive and anti-inflammatory properties of Propolis and Biodentine on SHED.

作者信息

Kale Yogesh, Yadav Swapnil, Dadpe Mahesh, Dahake Prasanna, Kendre Shrikant

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, MIDSR Dental College and Hospital, Latur, Maharashtra 413512, India.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2022 Nov;34(7):544-552. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cell viability, differentiation potential and anti-inflammatory potential of propolis and Biodentine™ on stem cells isolated from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SHED were segregated and cultured from the dental pulp of children after therapeutic extraction. Microculture Tetrazolium Assay (MTT) assay was carried out for assessing cell proliferation potential of propolis and Biodentine at different concentrations. As per the results from cell proliferation assay, cell differentiation potential of SHED was evaluated at concentration of 12.5 μg/ml using Alizarin Red staining. The anti-inflammatory potential of test materials was evaluated using gelatin zymography by detecting MMP-2 and MMP-9.

RESULTS

The maximum cell proliferation percentage of SHED treated with propolis and Biodentine was observed at a concentration of 12.5 μg/ml, on day 7, 14 and 21 with Biodentine having maximum cell proliferation potential followed by propolis. SHED treated with Biodentine showed maximum cell differentiation on day 7 (107.16), 14 (106.29) and 21 (107.72). However, anti-inflammatory activity against MMP-2 was 95 % with propolis and 85 % with Biodentine and whereas, against MMP-9 it was 65 % for propolis and 47 % for Biodentine.

CONCLUSION

Propolis shows comparable cell viability, cell proliferation and differentiation potential on SHED when compared to Biodentine. It also exhibits better invitro anti-inflammatory activity on SHED compared to Biodentine. Further studies are warranted to validate the application of propolis as an effective and economical alternative biocompatible agent to Biodentine for vital pulp therapies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较蜂胶与 Biodentine™ 对从人乳牙脱落牙髓中分离出的干细胞(SHED)的细胞活力、分化潜能和抗炎潜能。

材料与方法

从儿童治疗性拔牙后的牙髓中分离并培养 SHED。采用微量培养四唑盐比色法(MTT 法)评估不同浓度蜂胶和 Biodentine 的细胞增殖潜能。根据细胞增殖试验结果,使用茜素红染色在 12.5 μg/ml 浓度下评估 SHED 的细胞分化潜能。通过检测基质金属蛋白酶 -2(MMP-2)和基质金属蛋白酶 -9(MMP-9),采用明胶酶谱法评估受试材料的抗炎潜能。

结果

在第 7 天、14 天和 21 天,蜂胶和 Biodentine 处理的 SHED 在 12.5 μg/ml 浓度下观察到最大细胞增殖百分比,其中 Biodentine 的细胞增殖潜能最大,其次是蜂胶。用 Biodentine 处理的 SHED 在第 7 天(107.16)、14 天(106.29)和 21 天(107.72)显示出最大细胞分化。然而,蜂胶对 MMP-2 的抗炎活性为 95%,Biodentine 为 85%;而对 MMP-9,蜂胶为 65%,Biodentine 为 47%。

结论

与 Biodentine 相比,蜂胶在 SHED 上表现出相当的细胞活力、细胞增殖和分化潜能。与 Biodentine 相比,它在 SHED 上还表现出更好的体外抗炎活性。有必要进一步研究以验证蜂胶作为一种有效且经济的替代生物相容性剂在牙髓治疗中替代 Biodentine 的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ebf/9577971/40dd2661ad1c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验