• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过二分图刻画蛋白质歧义组中肽-蛋白关系。

Characterization of peptide-protein relationships in protein ambiguity groups via bipartite graphs.

机构信息

Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Medical Proteome Analysis, Center for Protein Diagnostics (PRODI), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276401. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276401
PMID:36269744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9586388/
Abstract

In bottom-up proteomics, proteins are enzymatically digested into peptides before measurement with mass spectrometry. The relationship between proteins and their corresponding peptides can be represented by bipartite graphs. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of bipartite graphs using quantified peptides from measured data sets as well as theoretical peptides from an in silico digestion of the corresponding complete taxonomic protein sequence databases. The aim of this study is to characterize and structure the different types of graphs that occur and to compare them between data sets. We observed a large influence of the accepted minimum peptide length during in silico digestion. When changing from theoretical peptides to measured ones, the graph structures are subject to two opposite effects. On the one hand, the graphs based on measured peptides are on average smaller and less complex compared to graphs using theoretical peptides. On the other hand, the proportion of protein nodes without unique peptides, which are a complicated case for protein inference and quantification, is considerably larger for measured data. Additionally, the proportion of graphs containing at least one protein node without unique peptides rises when going from database to quantitative level. The fraction of shared peptides and proteins without unique peptides as well as the complexity and size of the graphs highly depends on the data set and organism. Large differences between the structures of bipartite peptide-protein graphs have been observed between database and quantitative level as well as between analyzed species. In the analyzed measured data sets, the proportion of protein nodes without unique peptides ranged from 6.4% to 55.0%. This highlights the need for novel methods that can quantify proteins without unique peptides. The knowledge about the structure of the bipartite peptide-protein graphs gained in this study will be useful for the development of such algorithms.

摘要

在自下而上的蛋白质组学中,蛋白质在使用质谱进行测量之前被酶解成肽。蛋白质与其相应肽之间的关系可以用二部图来表示。我们使用来自测量数据集的定量肽以及来自相应全分类蛋白质序列数据库的计算机消化理论肽对二部图进行全面分析。本研究的目的是描述和构建不同类型的图,并在数据集之间进行比较。我们观察到在计算机消化过程中接受的最小肽长度有很大的影响。当从理论肽变为测量肽时,图形结构受到两种相反的影响。一方面,与使用理论肽的图相比,基于测量肽的图平均更小且更简单。另一方面,对于蛋白质推断和定量来说是一个复杂情况的没有唯一肽的蛋白质节点的比例,对于测量数据来说要大得多。此外,当从数据库到定量水平时,包含至少一个没有唯一肽的蛋白质节点的图的比例会上升。无独特肽的共享肽和蛋白质的比例以及图的复杂性和大小高度依赖于数据集和生物体。在数据库和定量水平以及分析物种之间观察到二部肽-蛋白质图的结构之间存在很大差异。在所分析的测量数据集,没有独特肽的蛋白质节点的比例范围为 6.4%至 55.0%。这突出表明需要有新的方法来定量无独特肽的蛋白质。本研究中获得的关于二部肽-蛋白质图结构的知识将有助于此类算法的开发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/80296709b907/pone.0276401.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/9a37a078db2b/pone.0276401.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/1363e1abd735/pone.0276401.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/cf64a204aed0/pone.0276401.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/80296709b907/pone.0276401.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/9a37a078db2b/pone.0276401.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/1363e1abd735/pone.0276401.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/cf64a204aed0/pone.0276401.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a526/9586388/80296709b907/pone.0276401.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterization of peptide-protein relationships in protein ambiguity groups via bipartite graphs.通过二分图刻画蛋白质歧义组中肽-蛋白关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276401. eCollection 2022.
2
Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency.通过二分图分析实现蛋白质组简约性可提高准确性和透明度。
J Proteome Res. 2007 Sep;6(9):3549-57. doi: 10.1021/pr070230d. Epub 2007 Aug 4.
3
Current algorithmic solutions for peptide-based proteomics data generation and identification.当前基于肽段的蛋白质组学数据生成和鉴定的算法解决方案。
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Feb;24(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
4
Protein Inference from the Integration of Tandem MS Data and Interactome Networks.从串联质谱数据和互作网络整合中进行蛋白质推断。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):1399-1409. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2016.2601618. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Targeting peptide termini, a novel immunoaffinity approach to reduce complexity in mass spectrometric protein identification.靶向肽末端,一种新的免疫亲和方法,可降低质谱蛋白质鉴定的复杂性。
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Feb;10(2):M110.002857. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.002857. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
6
Prediction of peptides observable by mass spectrometry applied at the experimental set level.在实验装置水平上应用质谱法对可观测肽段的预测。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;8 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S7-S23.
7
In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.使用多个搜索引擎和明确的指标对蛋白质推断算法进行深入分析。
J Proteomics. 2017 Jan 6;150:170-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
8
The complete peptide dictionary--a meta-proteomics resource.完整肽词典——元蛋白质组学资源。
Proteomics. 2010 Dec;10(23):4306-10. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000270.
9
Improving the Protein Inference from Bottom-Up Proteomic Data Using Identifications from MS1 Spectra.利用 MS1 谱图鉴定提高从头测序蛋白质组学数据的蛋白质推断。
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2021 May 5;32(5):1258-1262. doi: 10.1021/jasms.1c00061. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
10
Popitam: towards new heuristic strategies to improve protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data.
Proteomics. 2003 Jun;3(6):870-8. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300402.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications in proteomic experiments with shared peptides: a weight-based approach.使用共享肽段的蛋白质组学实验中蛋白质和翻译后修饰的相对定量:一种基于权重的方法。
Bioinformatics. 2025 Mar 4;41(3). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf046.
2
─ A User-Friendly Command-Line Tool Simplifying Differential Expression Analysis in Quantitative Proteomics.─ 一个用户友好的命令行工具,简化定量蛋白质组学中的差异表达分析。
J Proteome Res. 2025 Feb 7;24(2):955-965. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00911. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
3
Cytosolic and Acrosomal pH Regulation in Mammalian Sperm.

本文引用的文献

1
Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together Again: What Does Protein Quantification Mean in Bottom-Up Proteomics?将“Humpty Dumpty”重新拼凑起来:在“自上而下”蛋白质组学中,蛋白质定量意味着什么?
J Proteome Res. 2022 Apr 1;21(4):891-898. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00894. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
2
A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of this Field.自下而上蛋白质组学的批判性综述:该领域的优势、不足与未来
Proteomes. 2020 Jul 6;8(3):14. doi: 10.3390/proteomes8030014.
3
EPIFANY: A Method for Efficient High-Confidence Protein Inference.
哺乳动物精子细胞浆和顶体的 pH 调节。
Cells. 2024 May 17;13(10):865. doi: 10.3390/cells13100865.
4
Observations from the Proteomics Bench.蛋白质组学实验台的观察结果。
Proteomes. 2024 Feb 6;12(1):6. doi: 10.3390/proteomes12010006.
EPIFANY:一种高效高可信度蛋白质推断方法。
J Proteome Res. 2020 Mar 6;19(3):1060-1072. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00566. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Reproducibility, Specificity and Accuracy of Relative Quantification Using Spectral Library-based Data-independent Acquisition.基于谱库的非依赖数据采集的相对定量的重现性、特异性和准确性。
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2020 Jan;19(1):181-197. doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA119.001714. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Protein Inference Using PIA Workflows and PSI Standard File Formats.使用 PIA 工作流程和 PSI 标准文件格式进行蛋白质推断。
J Proteome Res. 2019 Feb 1;18(2):741-747. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00723. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data.PRIDE 数据库及相关工具和资源在 2019 年的进展:提高定量数据支持。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D442-D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106.
7
Deducing the presence of proteins and proteoforms in quantitative proteomics.定量蛋白质组学中蛋白质和蛋白质异构体的推断。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 13;9(1):2320. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04411-5.
8
Bipartite graphs in systems biology and medicine: a survey of methods and applications.系统生物学和医学中的二部图:方法和应用综述。
Gigascience. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):1-31. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy014.
9
In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.使用多个搜索引擎和明确的指标对蛋白质推断算法进行深入分析。
J Proteomics. 2017 Jan 6;150:170-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
10
Mass Spectrometry Applied to Bottom-Up Proteomics: Entering the High-Throughput Era for Hypothesis Testing.质谱在蛋白质组学中的应用:进入高通量假设检验时代。
Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2016 Jun 12;9(1):449-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041535. Epub 2016 Mar 30.