Suppr超能文献

研究姑息治疗中的少数群体社区:变革议程。

Researching minoritised communities in palliative care: An agenda for change.

作者信息

Koffman Jonathan, Bajwah Sabrina, Davies Joanna M, Hussain Jamilla Akhter

机构信息

University of Hull, Hull York Medical School, Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull, UK.

King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2023 Apr;37(4):530-542. doi: 10.1177/02692163221132091. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care access, experiences and outcomes of care disadvantage those from ethnically diverse, Indigenous, First nation and First people communities. Research into this field of inquiry raises unique theoretical, methodological, and moral issues. Without the critical reflection of methods of study and reporting of findings, researchers may inadvertently compromise their contribution to reducing injustices and perpetuating racism.

AIM

To examine key evidence of the place of minoritised communities in palliative care research to devise recommendations that improve the precision and rigour of research and reporting of findings.

METHODS

Narrative review of articles identified from PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar for 10 years augmented with supplementary searches.

RESULTS

We identified and appraised 109 relevant articles. Four main themes were identified (i) Lack of precision when working with a difference; (ii) 'black box epidemiology' and its presence in palliative care research; (iii) the inclusion of minoritised communities in palliative care research; and (iv) the potential to cause harm. All stymie opportunities to 'level up' health experiences and outcomes across the palliative care spectrum.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this review palliative care research must reflect on and justify the classification of minoritised communities, explore and understand intersectionality, optimise data quality, decolonise research teams and methods, and focus on reducing inequities to level up end-of-life care experiences and outcomes. Palliative care research must be forthright in explicitly indentifying instances of structural and systemic racism in palliative care research and engaging in non-judgemental debate on changes required.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗的可及性、体验和护理结果对来自不同种族、原住民、第一民族和原住民社区的人不利。对这一研究领域的探究引发了独特的理论、方法和道德问题。如果不对研究方法和研究结果报告进行批判性反思,研究人员可能会无意中损害他们在减少不公正和消除种族主义方面的贡献。

目的

审视少数群体社区在姑息治疗研究中的关键证据,以提出建议,提高研究的精准度和严谨性以及研究结果报告的质量。

方法

对从PubMed、CINAHL和谷歌学术搜索中识别出的10年文章进行叙述性综述,并辅以补充搜索。

结果

我们识别并评估了109篇相关文章。确定了四个主要主题:(i)在处理差异时缺乏精准度;(ii)“黑箱流行病学”及其在姑息治疗研究中的存在;(iii)少数群体社区纳入姑息治疗研究;(iv)造成伤害的可能性。所有这些都阻碍了在姑息治疗全范围内“提升”健康体验和结果的机会。

结论

基于本综述的结果,姑息治疗研究必须反思并说明对少数群体社区的分类,探索和理解交叉性,优化数据质量,使研究团队和方法非殖民化,并专注于减少不平等现象,以提升临终护理体验和结果。姑息治疗研究必须坦率地明确指出姑息治疗研究中结构性和系统性种族主义的实例,并就所需的变革进行无偏见的辩论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验